Korean Circulation Journal

  • 제48권2호
  • /
  • Pages.114-123
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1738-5520(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1738-5555(eISSN)
대한심장학회 (The Korean Society of Cardiology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Cryoballoon Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: a Comprehensive Review and Practice Guide

  • Jin, Eun-Sun (Cardiovascular Center, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Wang, Paul J. (Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2017.10.10
  • 심사 : 2017.11.30
  • 발행 : 2018.02.28
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The cryoballoon was invented to achieve circumferential pulmonary vein isolation more efficiently to compliment the shortcomings of point-by-point ablation by radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Its efficacy and safety were shown to be comparable to those of RFA, and the clinical outcomes have improved with the second-generation cryoballoon. The basic biophysics, implemental techniques, procedural recommendations, clinical outcomes, and complications of the cryoballoon are presented in this practical and systematic review.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Calkins H, Kuck KH, Cappato R, et al. 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design: a report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. Developed in partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society (ECAS); and in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American Heart Association (AHA), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). Endorsed by the governing bodies of the American College of Cardiology Foundation, the American Heart Association, the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society, the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Heart Rhythm Society. Heart Rhythm 2012;9:632-696.e21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.12.016
  2. Haissaguerre M, Jais P, Shah DC, et al. Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins. N Engl J Med 1998;339:659-66. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199809033391003
  3. Verma A, Jiang CY, Betts TR, et al. Approaches to catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1812-22. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1408288
  4. Gallagher JJ, Anderson RW, Kasell J, et al. Cryoablation of drug-resistant ventricular tachycardia in a patient with a variant of scleroderma. Circulation 1978;57:190-7. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.57.1.190
  5. Kuck KH, Brugada J, Furnkranz A, et al. Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2016;374:2235-45. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1602014
  6. Whittaker DK. Mechanisms of tissue destruction following cryosurgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1984;66:313-8.
  7. Kaszala K, Ellenbogen KA. Biophysics of the second-generation cryoballoon: cryobiology of the big freeze. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2015;8:15-7. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.115.002675
  8. Andrade JG, Dubuc M, Guerra PG, et al. The biophysics and biomechanics of cryoballoon ablation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2012;35:1162-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2012.03436.x
  9. Metzner A, Wissner E, Lin T, Ouyang F, Kuck KH. Balloon devices for atrial fibrillation therapy. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev 2015;4:58-61. https://doi.org/10.15420/aer.2015.4.1.58
  10. Metzner A, Reissmann B, Rausch P, et al. One-year clinical outcome after pulmonary vein isolation using the second-generation 28-mm cryoballoon. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2014;7:288-92. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.114.001473
  11. Casado-Arroyo R, Chierchia GB, Conte G, et al. Phrenic nerve paralysis during cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation: a comparison between the first- and second-generation balloon. Heart Rhythm 2013;10:1318-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.07.005
  12. Di Giovanni G, Wauters K, Chierchia GB, et al. One-year follow-up after single procedure cryoballoon ablation: a comparison between the first and second generation balloon. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2014;25:834-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.12409
  13. Straube F, Dorwarth U, Schmidt M, Wankerl M, Ebersberger U, Hoffmann E. Comparison of the first and second cryoballoon: high-volume single-center safety and efficacy analysis. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2014;7:293-9. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.113.000899
  14. Kimura M, Sasaki S, Owada S, et al. Comparison of lesion formation between contact force-guided and non-guided circumferential pulmonary vein isolation: a prospective, randomized study. Heart Rhythm 2014;11:984-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.03.019
  15. Aryana A, Bowers MR, O'Neill PG. Outcomes of cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation: a comprehensive review. J Atr Fibrillation 2015;8:1231.
  16. Jourda F, Providencia R, Marijon E, et al. Contact-force guided radiofrequency vs. second-generation balloon cryotherapy for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation-a prospective evaluation. Europace 2015;17:225-31. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euu215
  17. Miyazaki S, Kuroi A, Hachiya H, et al. Early recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation with different ablation technologies - prospective comparison of radiofrequency vs. second-generation cryoballoon ablation. Circ J 2016;80:346-53. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-15-1051
  18. Nagy Z, Kis Z, Som Z, Földesi C, Kardos A. Catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: new generation cryoballoon or contact force sensing radiofrequency ablation? Orv Hetil 2016;157:849-54. https://doi.org/10.1556/650.2016.30408
  19. Squara F, Zhao A, Marijon E, et al. Comparison between radiofrequency with contact force-sensing and second-generation cryoballoon for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: a multicentre European evaluation. Europace 2015;17:718-24. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euv060
  20. Straube F, Dorwarth U, Ammar-Busch S, et al. First-line catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: outcome of radiofrequency vs. cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation. Europace 2016;18:368-75. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euv271
  21. Wasserlauf J, Pelchovitz DJ, Rhyner J, et al. Cryoballoon versus radiofrequency catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2015;38:483-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.12582
  22. Ciconte G, Baltogiannis G, de Asmundis C, et al. Circumferential pulmonary vein isolation as index procedure for persistent atrial fibrillation: a comparison between radiofrequency catheter ablation and second-generation cryoballoon ablation. Europace 2015;17:559-65. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euu350
  23. Julia J, Chierchia GB, de Asmundis C, et al. Regular atrial tachycardias following pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a retrospective comparison between the cryoballoon and conventional focal tip radiofrequency techniques. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2015;42:161-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-014-9961-4
  24. Khoueiry Z, Albenque JP, Providencia R, et al. Outcomes after cryoablation vs. radiofrequency in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: impact of pulmonary veins anatomy. Europace 2016;18:1343-51. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euv419
  25. Kardos A, Kis Z, Som Z, Nagy Z, Foldesi C. Two-year follow-up after contact force sensing radiofrequency catheter and second-generation cryoballoon ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a comparative single centre study. BioMed Res Int 2016;2016:6495753.
  26. Lakhani M, Saiful F, Parikh V, Goyal N, Bekheit S, Kowalski M. Recordings of diaphragmatic electromyograms during cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation accurately predict phrenic nerve injury. Heart Rhythm 2014;11:369-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.11.015
  27. Mondésert B, Andrade JG, Khairy P, et al. Clinical experience with a novel electromyographic approach to preventing phrenic nerve injury during cryoballoon ablation in atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2014;7:605-11. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.113.001238
  28. Miyazaki S, Nakamura H, Taniguchi H, et al. Esophagus-related complications during second-generation cryoballoon ablation-insight from simultaneous esophageal temperature monitoring from 2 esophageal probes. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2016;27:1038-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.13015
  29. Metzner A, Burchard A, Wohlmuth P, et al. Increased incidence of esophageal thermal lesions using the second-generation 28-mm cryoballoon. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2013;6:769-75. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.113.000228

피인용 문헌

  1. 2018 Korean Guidelines for Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Part II vol.19, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.18501/arrhythmia.2018.012
  2. Mid-term outcome following second-generation cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation in heart failure patients : effectiveness of single 3-min freeze cryoablation performed in a cohort of patient vol.20, pp.10, 2018, https://doi.org/10.2459/jcm.0000000000000845
  3. Cryoballoon ablation for pulmonary vein isolation vol.31, pp.8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.14459
  4. Ablation Modalities for Therapeutic Intervention in Arrhythmia-Related Cardiovascular Disease: Focus on Electroporation vol.10, pp.12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10122657
  5. Economics and laboratory efficiency of atrial fibrillation ablation vol.37, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1097/hco.0000000000000932
  6. A tale of two balloons: technical and procedural difference between cryoballoon systems vol.37, pp.1, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1097/hco.0000000000000942