KDI Journal of Economic Policy

Korea Development Institute (한국개발연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Measuring Nuclear Power Plant Negative Externalities through the Life Satisfaction Approach: The Case of Ulsan City

  • Received : 2018.01.09
  • Published : 2018.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

We have hypothesized that nuclear risk is significantly inversely related to the distance from residences to nuclear power plants and that the level of life satisfaction of residents therefore increases with the distance. We empirically explore the relationship between Ulsan citizens' life satisfaction levels and the distance between their residences and the Kori and Wolsong nuclear power plants (NPP) based on the life satisfaction approach (LSA). The dataset we used covers only Ulsan citizens from the biennial Ulsan Statistics on Citizen's Living Condition and Consciousness of 2014 and 2016. Controlling for micro-variables such as education, work satisfaction, gender, marital status, and expenditures, we found a statistically significant relationship between life satisfaction and the distance between the residences and the nuclear power plants. Nuclear negative externalities including (i) health and environmental impact, (ii) radioactive waste disposal, and (iii) the effect of severe accidents can be quantified in terms of LS units and monetary units. We were able to calculate the monetary value of NPP externalities at $277 per kilometer of distance for Kori and $280 per kilometer of distance for Wolsong at constant 2015 prices. These estimates are quite different from the traditional estimates made with the contingent valuation method, whereas they are similar to the findings of LSA studies abroad. Hence, the need to adopt the LSA in South Korea and policy implications are demonstrated.

Keywords

References

  1. Amerasinghe, N. and S. Porter. 2011. Fossilized thinking: The World Bank, Eskom, and the real cost of coal. Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL), Washington DC.
  2. Bauer, T. K., S. T. Braun, and M. Kvasnicka. 2017. "Nuclear power plant closures and local housing values: Evidence from Fukushima and the German housing market," Journal of Urban Economics, 99: 94-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2017.02.002
  3. Carson, R. T., R. C. Mitchell, M. Hanemann, R. J. Kopp, S. Presser, and P. A. Ruud. 2003. "Contingent valuation and lost passive use: Damages from the Exxon Valdez oil spill," Environmental and Resource Economics, 25(3): 257-286. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024486702104
  4. Cho, Seongjin and Changuk Park. 2015. Optimal energy mix in consideration with economic and social costs for nuclear power plants, Korea Energy Economics Institute (KEEI), Ulsan.
  5. Ea Energy Analyses. 2008. Renewable Energy Costs and Benefits for Society (RECABS), prepared for the IEA's Implementing Agreement on Renewable Energy Technology Deployment, Ea Energy Analyses, Copenhagen.
  6. Farber, S. 1998. "Undesirable Facilities and Property Values: A Summary of Empirical Studies," Ecological Economics, 24: 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00038-4
  7. Freeman, A. Myrick. III. 2003. The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods, Resources for the Future, Washington D.C.
  8. Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. and P. Frijters. 2004. "How Important Is Methodology for the Estimates of the Determinants of Happiness?" Economic Journal 114: 641-659. . https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00235.x
  9. Frey, B. S., S. Luechinger, and A. Stutzer. 2009. "The Life Satisfaction Approach to Environmental Valuation," CESifo Working Paper Series No. 2836.
  10. Frey, B. S., S. Luechinger, and A. Stutzer. 2004. Valuing public goods: The life satisfaction approach. CREMA Working Paper 2004(11).
  11. Future population trend. 2017. [Data file]. Retrieved from http://kostat.go.kr/
  12. Fink, A. and T. Stratmann. 2013. "U.S. housing prices and the Fukushima nuclear accident: To update, or not to update, that is the question," Working Paper 2013(4), International Center for Economic Research.
  13. Household Finance and Welfare Survey. 2017. Retrieved from http://kostat.go.kr/
  14. Kahneman D, I. Ritov, and D.A. Schkade. 1999. "Economic Preferences or Attitude Expressions?: An Analysis of Dollar Responses to Public Issues," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19: 203-235. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007835629236
  15. Korea Census. 2015. [Data file] Retrieved from http://kostat.go.kr/
  16. Korea Hydro Nuclear Power. 2017. Retrieved from http://www.khnp.co.kr/eng/content/529/main.do?mnCd=EN03020101
  17. Korea Environment Institute (KEI). 2013. Externalities of Nuclear Power, Sejong.
  18. Lee, S. H. and H. G. Kang. 2016. "Integrated framework for the external cost assessment of nuclear power plant accident considering risk aversion: The Korean case," Energy Policy, 92: 111-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.01.035
  19. Mankiw, N. G. 2014. Principles of macroeconomics, Cengage Learning. South-Western College Pub; 7th edition.
  20. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. 1993. "Natural Resource Damage Assessments under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990," Federal Register, 58 (10): 4601-4614.
  21. Nuclear Energy Agency. 2003. Nuclear Electricity Generation - What Are the External Costs? Paris: OECD.
  22. Rosen, Sherwin. 1974. "Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition," Journal of political economy, 82(1): 34-55. https://doi.org/10.1086/260169
  23. Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC). 2015. Gridded population of the world (GPW), [Online].
  24. Ulsan City. 2014 and 2016. Statistics on Citizen's Living Condition and Consciousness, Ulsan. Retrieved from: http://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=207&tblId=DT_20704_084_2014&vw_cd=MT_OTITLE&list_id=207_A001_2014_002_003&seqNo=&lang_mode=ko&language=kor&obj_var_id=&itm_id=&conn_path=E1
  25. Welsch, H. and J. Kuhling. 2009. "Using happiness data for environmental valuation: issues and applications," Journal of Economic Surveys, 23: 473?494.
  26. Welsch, H. and P. Biermann. 2016. "Measuring power plant externalities using life satisfaction data: A spatial analysis for Switzerland," Ecological Economics, 126: 98?111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.02.016
  27. Yamane, F., H. Ohgaki, and K. Asano. 2013. "The immediate impact of the Fukushima Daiichi accident on local property values," Risk Analysis, 33(11), 2023-2040. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12045