DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Impact of Student Assessment Activities on Claim and Evidence Formation in High School Argument-Based Inquiry

고등학교 논의기반 탐구 과학수업에서 학생 평가활동이 주장과 증거 형성에 미치는 영향

  • Lee, Seonwoo (Department of Chemistry Education, Pusan National University) ;
  • Nam, Jeonghee (Department of Chemistry Education, Pusan National University)
  • 이선우 (부산대학교 화학교육과) ;
  • 남정희 (부산대학교 화학교육과)
  • Received : 2017.12.21
  • Accepted : 2018.03.13
  • Published : 2018.06.20

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of student assessment activities on claim and evidence formation in argument-based inquiry (ABI) for high school students. The participants of the study were 166 grade 10 students from six different classes in the same high school. The experimental group (84 students) was taught Argument-Based Inquiry with students' self and peer assessment activities. The comparative group (82 students) was taught without the activities. Over one semester students participated in five ABI programs that we developed. According to the analysis of the claim and evidence from groups, the experimental group had a significantly higher mean score than the comparative group. The result of analysis of students' assessment in the experimental group, the frequency about accurate and sufficient evidence revealed to be high and students assessed whether peers' claims fit with the evidence and whether peers' explanations of the evidence's validity was sufficient. Students' answers in the survey and interviews showed that the students though they could improve the accuracy of their ideas, appropriateness of their evidence, and the method of presenting evidence based on the assessment results.

이 연구는 논의기반 탐구 과학수업에서 학생 평가활동이 고등학생들의 주장과 증거 형성에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지 알아보고자 하였다. 이를 위해 인문계 고등학교 1학년 166명을 대상으로 논의기반 탐구 과학수업을 실시하였으며, 실험집단 학생(84명)들은 모둠의 주장과 증거에 대한 평가 기회를 제공받았고 비교집단 학생(82명)들은 이 단계를 생략하였다. 학생 평가활동이 학생들의 주장과 증거 형성에 미치는 영향 알아보기 위해 학생들이 작성한 주장과 증거 그리고 학생 평가활동의 결과를 분석하였으며, 인터뷰와 설문조사를 통해 학생 평가활동의 타당성과 활용정도를 알아보았다. 연구 결과, 논의활동에서 증거를 형성하는 능력이 비교집단보다 실험집단이 통계적으로 유의미하게 높게 나타났으며, 실험집단 학생들이 비교집단 학생들보다 더 정확하고 충분한 증거를 제시하는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 실험집단 학생들은 평가활동을 통해 주장에 대한 증거가 적절한지, 증거가 충분한지, 제시된 증거 자료는 정확한지 대해 평가하며 지속적으로 평가결과를 피드백으로 활용하였음을 알 수 있었다. 학생들은 평가 결과가 대체적으로 타당하다고 인식하고 있으며, 평가 결과를 다음 활동에 반영하여 다양한 증거를 제시하는 능력이 향상되었다고 인식하고 있음을 알 수 있었다. 이를 통해 논의기반 탐구 과학수업에서 학생 평가활동이 학생들의 주장과 증거를 형성할 때 주장의 타당성과 정당성을 높이는 증거 형성에 효과적이라는 것을 알 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ministry of Education, 2015 Revised National Curriculum. Notice No. 2015-74; Ministry of Education, 2015.
  2. Kelly, G. J.; Chen, C.; Prothero, W. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2000, 37, 691. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200009)37:7<691::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-G
  3. Newton, P.; Driver, P.; Osborne, J. International Journal of Science Education 1999, 21, 553. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290570
  4. Osborne, J. Cambridge Journal of Education 2002, 32, 203. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640220147559
  5. Sampson, V.; Clark, D. B. Science Education 2008, 92, 447. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20276
  6. Keys, C. W.; Hand, B.; Prian, V.; Collins, S. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1999, 36, 1065. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199912)36:10<1065::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-I
  7. Nam, J.; Kwak, K.; Jang, K.; Hand, B. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2008, 8, 922.
  8. Kwak, K. H.; Nam, J. H. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education 2009, 29, 400.
  9. Nam, J. H.; Lee, D. W.; Cho, H. S. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education 2011, 31, 931.
  10. Sung, H.; Nam, J. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education 2013, 33, 249. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.2.249
  11. Hand, B.; Hohenshell, L.; Prain, V. Instructional Science 2007, 35, 343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-006-9012-3
  12. Meyer, K.; Woodruff, E. Science Education. 1997, 81, 173. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199704)81:2<173::AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-C
  13. Jang, K.; Nam, J. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society 2016, 60, 39. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2016.60.1.39
  14. Fiske, S.; Taylor, S. Social cognition (2nd ed.); McGraw-Hill: New York, 1991.
  15. Purchase, H. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 2000, 27, 341.
  16. Rust, C.; Price, M.; O'Donovan, B. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 2003, 28, 147. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930301671
  17. Smyth, K. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 2004, 29, 369.
  18. Boud, D.; Falchikov, N. Rethinking Assessment in Higher Education; Kogan Page: London, 2007.
  19. Andrade, H.; Du, Y. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 2007, 32, 159. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600801928
  20. Nam, H.; Ryu, S. Research Science Mathematics Education 2000, 23, 55.
  21. Li, L.; Liu, X.; Steckelberg, A. British Journal of Educational Technology 2010, 41, 525. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00968.x
  22. Liu, E. Z. F.; Lin, S. S. J.; Chiu, C. H.; Yuan, S. M. IEEE Transactions on Education 2001, 44, 246. https://doi.org/10.1109/13.940995
  23. Xiao, Y.; Lucking, R. The Internet and Higher Education 2008, 11, 186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.005
  24. Lee, S.; Bak, D.; Nam, J. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2015, 35, 353. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.3.0353
  25. Lee, S.; Nam, J. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2016, 36, 347. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.2.0347
  26. Biggs, J. B.; Moore, P. J. The Process of Learning (3rd ed.); Prentice Hall: New York, 1993.
  27. National Research Council. Taking Science to School: Learning and Teaching Science in Grades K-8; Duschl, R., Schweingruber, H., Shouse, A. Eds.; The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, 2007.
  28. Sandoval, W.; Millwood, K. Cognition and Instruction 2005, 23, 23. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2301_2
  29. Driver, R.; Newton, P.; Osborne, J. Science Education 2000, 84, 287. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
  30. Maloney, J.; & Simon, S. International Journal of Science Education 2006, 28, 1817. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600855419
  31. Nussbaum, E. Educational Psychologist. 2011, 46, 84. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.558816
  32. Sampson, V.; Grooms, J.; Walker. J. Science Education 2010, 95, 217.