DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A simple technique for impression taking of teeth and functionally generated paths

  • Yamamoto, Takatsugu (Department of Operative Dentistry, Tsurumi University School of Dental Medicine) ;
  • Sato, Yohei (Department of Removable Prosthodontics, Tsurumi University School of Dental Medicine) ;
  • Watanabe, Hidehiko (Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Oregon Health & Science University) ;
  • Punj, Amit (Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Oregon Health & Science University) ;
  • Abe, Minoru (Department of Removable Prosthodontics, Tsurumi University School of Dental Medicine) ;
  • Momoi, Yasuko (Department of Operative Dentistry, Tsurumi University School of Dental Medicine) ;
  • Ohkubo, Chikahiro (Department of Removable Prosthodontics, Tsurumi University School of Dental Medicine)
  • Received : 2017.10.24
  • Accepted : 2018.01.21
  • Published : 2018.02.02

Abstract

The objective of this case report is to introduce a simple technique for simultaneously taking a closed-mouth impression and functionally generated path (FGP) for a full coverage crown restoration. A monolithic zirconia crown was the restoration of choice. An alginate impression of the abutment tooth was taken to fabricate a custom-made closed-mouth impression tray covering the abutment tooth and the adjacent teeth. The tray had an FGP table and an abutment tray in cameo and intaglio surfaces, respectively. The impression was taken with silicone impression material after adjusting the abutment tray and inscribing the FGP using self-curing acrylic resins. Plaster casts were made from the impression, and a zirconia crown was fabricated. The crown was cemented to the abutment tooth with minimal adjustments. This simple technique resulted in a well-fitting crown that accounted for mandibular movements. Using the custom closed-mouth impression tray incorporating an FGP table simultaneously aids in fabricating an accurately fitting restoration that incorporates harmonious mandibular movements using a single impression capture.

Keywords

References

  1. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J. Contemporary fxed prosthodontics. 5th ed. St. Louis (MO): Elsevier; 2016. Part II. Clinical procedures: Section 1. Chapter 14. Tissue management and impression making; p393-395.
  2. Parker MH, Cameron SM, Hughbanks JC, Reid DE. Comparison of occlusal contacts in maximum intercuspation for two impression techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:255-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70023-4
  3. Millstein P, Maya A, Segura C. Determining the accuracy of stock and custom tray impression/casts. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25:645-648. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00306.x
  4. Donovan TE, Chee WW. A review of contemporary impression materials and techniques. Dent Clin North Am 2004;48:445-470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2003.12.014
  5. DuVall NB, Rogers PM. Application of the functionally generated path technique to restore mandibular molars in bilateral group function occlusion. J Prosthodont 2013;22:226-232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00944.x
  6. Lawson NC, Janyavula S, Syklawer S, McLaren EA, Burgess JO. Wear of enamel opposing zirconia and lithium disilicate afer adjustment, polishing and glazing. J Dent 2014;42:1586-1591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.09.008