DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Basic Study on Proper Straight Route Distance under Marine Bridge using ES Model

ES모델을 이용한 해상교량 하부 적정 직선항로 길이에 대한 기초 연구

  • Received : 2018.02.12
  • Accepted : 2018.04.27
  • Published : 2018.04.30

Abstract

Keeping a proper straight route length under the marine bridge is one of the important factors for the safe passage of ships. However, according to port and harbor design standards, there is only a constant guideline of 8 times the length of the marine bridge underpass. On this study, we used the ES model to determine the ratio of risk to the route width, traffic volume, the degree of curvature of the route, and the length of the straight route in order to derive the optimal straight route distance. As a result, the risk ratio decreased by 2.27% as the route distance increased from 3L to 10L when the degree of curvature of the route was $45^{\circ}$. The risk associated with curvature was found to be 4.83% when the bending degree was changed from $0^{\circ}$ to $45^{\circ}$ in the case of 3L length. In addition, it was confirmed that the risk ratio according to the degree of curvature of the route and the straight route was reduced by 1.45% at maximum under the condition that the width of the line was 400m and the number of the vessels generated per hour was 20. It was verified that a straight route distance more than a certain length is needed depending on the congestion degree and the degree of curvature of the route when constructing the marine bridge.

해상교량 하부의 직선항로 길이 확보는 선박 통항 안전을 위한 중요한 요소 중 하나이다. 그러나 항만 및 어항 설계기준에 따르면 해상교량 하부 직선항로 길이는 선박길이의 8배로 획일적인 가이드라인을 적용하고 있다. 본 연구는 적정 해상교량 하부직선길이를 도출하기 위해 ES 모델을 이용하여 항로폭, 통항량, 항로의 곡률, 직선항로길이에 따른 위험도 비율을 확인했다. 확인 결과 항로의 곡률이 $45^{\circ}$의 경우 항로길이가 3L에서 10L로 길어짐에 따라 위험도 비율이 2.27 % 감소했다. 곡률에 따른 위험도는 직선항로의 길이가 3L의 경우 곡률이 $45^{\circ}$에서 $0^{\circ}$로 변하면서 위험도 비율이 4.83 % 감소하는 것을 확인했다. 또한 항로폭 400 m, 시간당 발생선박이 20척의 조건에서 항로의 곡률별, 직선항로에 따른 위험도 비율은 최대 1.45 % 감소하는 것을 확인했다. 이를 통해 해상 교량 건설 시 항로의 혼잡도 및 곡률에 따라 일정 길이 이상의 직선항로가 필요함을 검증했다.

Keywords

References

  1. Fujii, Y. and N. Mizuki(1998), Design of VTS systems for water with bridges, Proceedings of the international symposium on advances in ship collision analysis, pp. 177-190.
  2. Inoue, K.(2000), Evaluation Method of Ship handling Difficulty for Navigation in Restricted and Congested Waterways, The Royal Institute fo Navigation, Vol. 53, No. 1, pp. 167-180. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463399008541
  3. KMOU(2017), Korea Maritime and Ocean University, Report of Maritime Traffic Safety Diagnosis on Yeongjong-Cheongna-Linked Road, pp. 278-296.
  4. Kuniaki, S.(1991), On the Safety of Waterways Passing through Bridges Based on the Analysis of Ship Collision Accident, Japan Institute of Navigation, Vol. 84, pp. 103-111. https://doi.org/10.9749/jin.84.103
  5. Lee, Y. S., I. S. Cho, J. H. Cho and C. U. Song(2008), A Study on the Analysis of Ship Handling Simulation about Domestic Sea Bridge over the Harbor, Journal of Navigation and Port Research, Vol. 32, No. 5, pp. 321-326. https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2008.32.5.321
  6. Lee, Y. S., Y. S. Park, U. Lee, C. H. Jung and J. S. Park(2009), A Study on the Proper Location and Scale of Bridge Crossing navigable Waterways Considering the Safety of Marine Traffic, Journal of Navigation and Port Research, Vol. 33, No. 5, pp. 295-301. https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2009.33.5.295
  7. Maritime Safety Act.(2017), http://www.law.go.kr/ (accessed: 11TH Dec. 2017).
  8. MOF(2017), Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, Maritime Safety Audit Scheme Index of Enforcement, Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries Notification No. 2017-21(2017), pp. 26-33.
  9. MOF(2014), Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, Port and Harbor Design Standards, p. 1213.
  10. MOLIT(2017), Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Raod Bridge and Tunnel Statistics, http://stat.molit.go.kr/portal/main/ (Accessed: 11TH Dec. 2017).
  11. Park, Y. S., Y. S. Lee, J. S. Park, I. S. Cho and U. Lee(2008), A Proposal of Bridge Design Guideline by Analysis of Marine Accident Parameters occurred at Bridges Crossing Navigable Waterways, Journal of Navigation and Port Research, Vol. 32, No. 10, pp. 743-750. https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2008.32.10.743