DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Nature of a Firm, Degree of Cluster Linkages, and Innovation: A Study of Bengaluru High-tech Manufacturing Cluster

  • 투고 : 2017.08.15
  • 심사 : 2018.01.23
  • 발행 : 2018.04.30

초록

It is generally understood that clusters are the promoters of innovation and therefore, the attention of researchers has been increasingly to discern the factors driving innovation among the firms in a cluster, especially in a high-tech cluster. In this study, we identify the variables capturing the nature of a firm that possibly impact the absorptive capacity of a firm and subsequently ascertain their impact on the degree of interactions between a firm, and other firms and associated institutions within and outside a cluster, respectively. Furthermore, we probe the influence of these interactions as a whole on firm-level innovation. The study was carried out in the context of Bengaluru, which houses the densely interconnected network of innovation-intensive high-tech manufacturing firms forming a high-tech manufacturing cluster. Data were drawn from 101 high-tech manufacturing firms belonging to electronics, machine tools, electrical and pharmaceutical industries. Based on the cluster analysis and subsequent graphical analysis on each of the three profiled clusters, it was found that size and origin of a firm have significant impact on the degree of firm's interactions. In turn, higher dynamism of firms in terms of degree of interactions led to higher innovation performance.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bala Subrahmanya, M.H. (2011) Technological innovation and growth of SMEs in Bangalore: does innovation facilitate growth of firm size?, Asian Journal of Technology Management, 4(1), 41-55.
  2. Bala Subrahmanya, M.H. (2013) External support, innovation and economic performance: what firm level factors matter for high-tech SMEs? How?, International Journal of Innovation Management, 17(5), 1-26.
  3. Baptista, R. and Swann, P. (1998) Do firms in clusters innovate more?, Research Policy, 27(5), 525-540. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00065-1
  4. Becheikh, N., Landry, R. and Amara, N. (2006) Lessons from innovation empirical studies in the manufacturing sector: a systematic review of the literature from 1993-2003, Technovation, 26(5-6), 644-664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2005.06.016
  5. Bell, M. and Albu, M. (1999) Knowledge systems and technological dynamism in industrial clusters in developing countries, World Development, 27(9), 1715-1734. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00073-X
  6. Bergman, E.M. (2008) Cluster life-cycles: an emerging synthesis, In Karlsson, C., Handbook of Research on Cluster Theory, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 114-132.
  7. Berry, A. (1997) SME Competitiveness: The Power of Networking and Subcontracting, Washington D.C: Inter-American Development Bank.
  8. Brenner, T. and Gildner, A. (2006) The Long-term implications of local industrial clusters, European Planning Studies, 14(9), 1315-1328. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310600933371
  9. Cohen, W. and Levinthal, D. (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
  10. Chandrashekar, D. and Bala Subrahmanya, M.H. (2017a) Degree of cluster linkages and innovation performance of a firm: a study Bengaluru high-tech manufacturing cluster, Bristol, UK: International Symposium on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, 834-847.
  11. Chandrashekar, D. and Bala Subrahmanya, M.H. (2017b) Absorptive capacity as a determinant of innovation of SMEs: a study of Bengaluru high-tech manufacturing cluster, Small Enterprise Research, 24(3), 290-315. https://doi.org/10.1080/13215906.2017.1396491
  12. Chandrashekar, D. and Bala Subrahmanya, M.H. (2017c) Exploring the Factors of Cluster Linkages that Influence Innovation Performance of Firms in a Cluster, Economics of Innovation and New Technology.
  13. Chandrashekar, D. and Bala Subrahmanya, M.H. (2017d) Exploring the influence of absorptive capacity on innovation in Bengaluru high-tech manufacturing cluster, Santa Clara, CA: IEEE Technology and Engineering Management Society Conference, 166-172.
  14. Chandrashekar, D. and Bala Subrahmanya, M.H. (2018) Absorptive capacity, cluster linkages and innovation: an evidence from Bengaluru high-tech manufacturing cluster, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 29(1), 121-148. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-05-2017-0087
  15. Fabrizio, K.R. (2009) Absorptive capacity and the search for innovation, Research Policy, 38(2), 255-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.023
  16. Fosfuri, A. and Tribo, J.A. (2008) Exploring the anticidents of potential absorptive capacity and its impact on innovation performance, International Journal of Management, 36(2), 173-187.
  17. Gildner, T.B. (2006) The long-term implications of local industrial clusters, European Planning Studies, 14(9), 1315-1328. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310600933371
  18. Giuliani, E. (2005) Cluster absoptive capacity: why do some clusters forge ahead and others lag behind, European Urban and Regional Studies, 12(3), 269-288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776405056593
  19. Giuliani, E. and Bell, M. (2008) The industrial clusters and the evolution of their knowledge networks: Revisiting a Chilean Case, Brighton, UK: SPRU working paper series.
  20. Giuliani, E. and Bell, M. (2005) The micro-determinants of meso-level learning and innovation: evidence from a Chilean wine cluster, Research Policy, 34(1), 47-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.10.008
  21. Go, K. (2006) New Industrial Policy 2006-2011, Bangalore: Department of Industries and Commerce.
  22. He, J. and Fallah, M.H. (2011) The typology of technology cluster and its evolution- evidence from hi-tech industries, Technology Forecasting and Social Change, 48(6), 945-952.
  23. Ketels, C.H. (2003) The development of the cluster concept-present experiences and further developments, Duisburg, Germany: NRW Conference on Clusters.
  24. Kostopoulos, K., Papalexandris, A., Papachroni, M., and Loannou, G. (2011) Absorptive capacity, innovation, and financial performance, Journal of Business Research, 64(12), 1335-1343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.12.005
  25. Kim, L. (1995) Absorptice Capacity and Industrial Growth: A Conceptual Framework and Korea's Experience, St. Martin's Press, 256-287.
  26. Kumar, S.R. and Bala Subrahmanya, M.H. (2003) Subcontracting relationship of Indian, SMEs with a global TNC: do SMEs gain? How?, Singapore: Singapore Economic Review Conference.
  27. Lau, A.K. and Lo, W. (2015) Regional innovation system, absorptive capacity and innovation performance; an empirical study, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 92, 99-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.11.005
  28. Li, W., Veliyath, R. and Tan, J. (2013) Network characteristics and firm performance: an examination of the relationships in the context of a cluster, Journal of Small Business Management, 51(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2012.00375.x
  29. Markusen, A. (1996) Sticky places in slippery space: a typology of industrial districts, Economic Geography, 72(3), 293-313. https://doi.org/10.2307/144402
  30. Miguelez, E. and Moreno, R. (2015) Knowledge flows and the absorptive capacity of regions, Research Policy, 44(4), 833-848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.01.016
  31. Morosini, P. (2004) Industrial clusters, knowledge integration and performance, World Development, 32(3), 305-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2002.12.001
  32. Mowery, D.C. and Oxley, J.E. (1995) Inward technology transfer and competitiveness: the role of innovation systems. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 67-93.
  33. Maskell, P. (2001) Towards knowledge-based theory of the geographical cluster, Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 921-941. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/10.4.921
  34. Mytelka, L.K. (2000) Local systems of innovation in a globalized world economy, Industry and Innovation, 7(1), 33-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/713670250
  35. Nadvi, K. (1995) Industrial Clusters and Networks: Case Studies of SME Growth and Innovation, UNIDO, Small Medium Enterprises Programme.
  36. NKC (2007) Innovation in India, Government of India.
  37. Nooteboom, B. (1999) Innovation and inter-firm linkages: new implications for policy. Research Policy, 28(8): 793-805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00022-0
  38. Okada, A. and Siddharthan, N. (2007) Industrial Clusters in India: Evidence from Automobile Clusters in Chennai and the National Capital Region, Institute for Studies in Industrial Development, Chiba, Japan: JETRO.
  39. Oneindia (2013) Retrieved from http://www.oneindia.com/2013/08/02/bangalore-listed-among-top-8-tech-clusters-in-mit-review-1274110.html
  40. Patibandla, M. and Petersen, B. (2002) Role of transnational corporations in the evolution of a high-tech industry: the case of India's software industry, World Development, 30(9), 1561-1577. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00060-8
  41. Porter, M.E. (1990) The Competitive of Nations, Harvard Business Review.
  42. Rao, P. and Klein, J.A. (2013) Inter-firm technology tranfers and collaboration, In Rao, P. and Klein, J.A., Strategies for High-tech Firms, New York: M.E. Sharpe, 107-120.
  43. Rao, P. and Klein, J.A. (2013) Sustaining competitive advantage in a high-tech environment, In Rao, P. and Klein, J.A., Strategies for High-Tech Firms, New York: M.E. Sharpe, 3-28.
  44. Revilla, A. and Fernandez, Z. (2005) Environmental dynamism firm size and the economic productivity of R&D, Industry and Innovation, 20(6), 503-522. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2013.833374
  45. Rosenfeld, S. (2005) Industry cluster: business choice, policy outcome, or branding strategy, New Business Ideas and Trends, 3(2), 4-13.
  46. Saxenian, A.L. (1994) Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128, Cambridge: MA: Harvard University Press.
  47. Schmitz, H. (1999) From ascribed to earned trust in exporting clusters, Journal of International Economics, 48(1), 139-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(98)00074-9
  48. Schumpeter, J.A. (1934) The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry Into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle, Transaction Publishers.
  49. Sonderegger, P. and Taube, F. (2010) Cluster life cycle and diaspora effects: evidence from the Indian IT cluster in Bangalore, Journal of International Management, 16(4), 283-397.
  50. Steinle, C. and Schiele, H. (2002) When do industries cluster? a proposal on how to assess an industry's propensity to concentrate at a single region or nation, Research Policy, 31(6), 849-858. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00151-2
  51. Sweet, C.M. and Maggio, D.S. (2015) Do stronger intellectual property rights increase innovation?, World Development, 66, 665-677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.08.025
  52. UNDP (2001) Human Development Report, New York: Oxford University Press.
  53. Zahra, S.A. and George, G. (2002) Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension, Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.6587995