DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block at 6th and 7th cervical vertebrae using the lateral paracarotid out-of-plane approach for sympathetic blockade in the upper extremity

  • Baek, Jongyoon (Gajo-myeon Public Health Branch) ;
  • Kim, Bum Soo (KIM BUM SOO PAIN CLINIC) ;
  • Yu, Hwarim (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Hyuckgoo (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Yeungnam University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lim, Chaeseok (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Yeungnam University College of Medicine) ;
  • Song, Sun Ok (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Yeungnam University College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2018.08.07
  • 심사 : 2018.11.09
  • 발행 : 2018.12.31

초록

Background: The authors have performed ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block (SGB) in our clinic using a lateral paracarotid approach at the level of the 6th cervical vertebra (C6). Although SGB at C6 is a convenient and safe method, there are ongoing concerns about the weak effect of sympathetic blockade in the ipsilateral upper extremity. Therefore, ultrasound-guided SGB was attempted using a lateral paracarotid approach at the level of the 7th cervical vertebra (C7). This prospective study aimed to compare changes in skin temperature after SGB was performed at C6 and C7, and to introduce a lateral paracarotid approach for SGB. Methods: Thirty patients underwent SGB twice: once at C6 and once at C7. For every SGB, the skin temperature of the patient's hypothenar area was measured for 15 min at 1-min intervals. Skin temperatures before and after SGB and side effects were compared between C6 and C7 groups. Results: The temperature of the upper extremity increased after SGB was performed at C6 and C7. There were significant differences between mean pre-SGB and the largest increases in post-SGB temperatures ($0.50{\pm}0.38^{\circ}C$ and $1.41{\pm}0.68^{\circ}C$ at C6 and C7, respectively; p<0.05). Significantly increased post-SGB temperatures (difference > $1^{\circ}C$) were found in 5/30 (16.7%) and 24/30 (80%) cases for C6 and C7, respectively (p<0.05). There were no significant differences in side effects between SGB performed at C6 or C7 (p>0.05). Conclusion: The lateral paracarotid approach using out-of-plane needle insertion for ultrasound-guided SGB performed at C7 was feasible and more effective at elevating skin temperature in the upper extremity than SGB at C6.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Narouze S, Vydyanathan A, Patel N. Ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block successfully prevented esophageal puncture. Pain Physician 2007;10:747-52.
  2. Narouze S. Ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block: safety and efficacy. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2014;18:424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-014-0424-5
  3. Kim H, Song SO, Jung G. A lateral paracarotid approach for ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block with a linear probe. J Anesth 2017;31:458-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-017-2354-y
  4. Jung G, Kim BS, Shin KB, Park KB, Kim SY, Song SO. The optimal volume of 0.2% ropivacaine required for an ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block. Korean J Anesthesiol 2011;60:179-84. https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2011.60.3.179
  5. Moore DC. Therapeutic stellate ganglion block: 5 versus 10 mL of a local anesthetic. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2008;33:191-2.
  6. Song SO, Jo YW. Effects of the volume of local anesthetic used in stellate ganglion block on the elevation of skin temperature of ipsilateral upper extremity. Korean J Anesthesiol 1999;37:233-9. https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.1999.37.2.233
  7. Elias M. Cervical sympathetic and stellate ganglion blocks. Pain Physician 2000;3:294-304.
  8. Hogan QH, Erickson SJ. MR imaging of the stellate ganglion: normal appearance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992;158:655-9. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.158.3.1739014
  9. Hogan QH, Erickson SJ, Haddox JD, Abram SE. The spread of solutions during stellate ganglion block. Reg Anesth 1992;17:78-83.
  10. Hogan QH, Erickson SJ, Abram SE. Computerized tomography-guided stellate ganglion blockade. Anesthesiology 1992;77596-9.
  11. Smith DW. Stellate ganglion block; the tissue displacement method. Am J Surg 1951;82:344-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(51)90324-8
  12. Moore DC, Bridenbaugh LD Jr. The anterior approach to the stellate ganglion use without a serious complication in two thousand blocks. J Am Med Assoc 1956;160:158-62. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1956.02960380006003
  13. Higa K, Hirata K, Hirota K, Nitahara K, Shono S. Retropharyngeal hematoma after stellate ganglion block: Analysis of 27 patients reported in the literature. Anesthesiology 2006;105:1238-45 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200612000-00024
  14. Moore DC. An unusual complication after stellate ganglion block. Br J Anaesth 1964;36:601.
  15. Uchida T, Nakao S, Morimoto M, Iwamoto T. Serious cervical hematoma after stellate ganglion block. J Anesth 2015;29:321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-014-1914-7
  16. Hong JT, Park DK, Lee MJ, Kim SW, An HS. Anatomical variations of the vertebral artery segment in the lower cervical spine: analysis by three-dimensional computed tomography angiography. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008;33:2422-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818938d1
  17. Kapral S, Krafft P, Gosch M, Fleischmann D, Weinstabl C. Ultrasound imaging for stellate ganglion block: direct visualization of puncture site and local anesthetic spread. A pilot study. Reg Anesth 1995;20:323-8.
  18. Lee MH, Kim KY, Song JH, Jung HJ, Lim HK, Lee DI, et al. Minimal volume of local anesthetic required for an ultrasound-guided SGB. Pain Med 2012;13:1381-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01495.x
  19. Bhatia A, Flamer D, Peng PW. Evaluation of sonoanatomy relevant to performing stellate ganglion blocks using anterior and lateral simulated approaches: an observational study. Can J Anaesth 2012;59:1040-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-012-9779-4

피인용 문헌

  1. Comment on an Article by Aleanakian et al. Titled “Effectiveness, Safety, and Predictive Potential in Ultrasound‐Guided Stellate Ganglion Blockades (SGB) for the Treatment of Sympathetical vol.21, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.12979