Safety and Health at Work

  • 제9권4호
  • /
  • Pages.388-397
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2093-7911(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2093-7997(eISSN)
산업안전보건연구원 (Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Penalties Imposed on Organisations for Breaching Safety and Health Regulations in the United Kingdom

  • Arewa, Andrew Oyen (School of Energy, Construction & Environment, Faculty of Engineering and Computing) ;
  • Theophilus, Stephen (School of Energy, Construction & Environment, Faculty of Engineering and Computing) ;
  • Ifelebuegu, Augustine (School of Energy, Construction & Environment, Faculty of Engineering and Computing) ;
  • Farrell, Peter (School of School of Engineering, The University of Bolton)
  • 투고 : 2017.05.27
  • 심사 : 2018.01.18
  • 발행 : 2018.12.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Background: The study analyzes penalties imposed on organizations for breaching safety and health regulations. The research questions are as follows: what are the commonly breached safety and health regulations? How proportional are penalties imposed on organizations for breaching health and safety regulations in the United Kingdom? Methods: The study employed sequential explanatory mixed research strategies for better understanding of health and safety penalties imposed on organizations. Actual health and safety convictions and penalties data for 10 years (2006 to 2016) were obtained through the United Kingdom Health and Safety Executive (HSE) public register for convictions. Overall, 2,217 health and safety cases were analyzed amounting to total fines of £37,179,916, in addition to other wide-ranging penalties. For thorough understanding, eight interviews were conducted with industry practitioners, lawyers, and HSE officials as part of the study qualitative data. Results: Findings show that the Health and Safety at Work (HSW) Act accounted for 46% of all HSE prosecution cases in the last decade. This is nearly half of the total safety and health at work prosecutions. Moreover, there is widespread desire for organizations to comply with the HSW Act, but route fines are seen as burdensome and inimical to business growth. Conclusion: A key deduction from the study reveal significant disproportionality concerning penalties imposed on organizations for breaching safety and health regulations. On aggregate, small companies tend to pay more for health and safety offenses in a ratio of 1:2 compared to large companies. The study also reveals that the HSW Act accounted for nearly half of the total safety and health at work prosecutions in the last decade.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Hallett L. Court of appeal ruling about fines for health and safety crimes. London: Health and Safety Board; 1998. 13 p. HSB Report 304.
  2. Choi GH, Loh BG. Control of industrial safety based on dynamic characteristics of a safety budget-industrial accident rate model in Republic of Korea. Saf Health Work 2017;8:189-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2016.11.002
  3. Warburton C. Step by step to record fines. Health and safety at work Magazine [internet]. 2016 [cited 2017 March 14]. Available from: https://www.healthandsafetyatwork.com/regulation/step-by-step-to-record-fines.
  4. Arewa AO, Farrell P. A review of construction SME's safety performance; where are we and why? In: Proceedings of the 11th International Postgraduate Research Conference (IPGRC) Salford, England 2013. 19 p.
  5. OECD. 'Occupational Accidents in OECD Countries. Luxembourg: The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Workplace Accident;2012. Report GRI 43.
  6. Augustin K. The 2016 health and safety sentencing guidelines: How have things changed for companies? [internet]. 2017 [cited 2015 April 28]. Saf Health Practitioners 2017;11:3-5. Available from: https://www.shponline.co.uk/the-2016-health-and-safety-sentencing guidelines-how-have-things-changedfor-companies/.
  7. Fidderman H. The fine gap in deterrence [internet]; 2014 [cited 2015 April 12]. Available from: https://www.healthandsafetyatwork.com/hsb-deterrence.
  8. Lofstedt RE. Reclaiming health and safety for all: an independent review of health and safety legislation. London: Health and Safety Review Team Department for Work and Pensions; 2011 November. 41 p.
  9. Bailey S, Jorgensen K, Koch C, Kruger W, Litske H. An innovative economic incentive model for improvement of the working environment in Europe, 5. Luxemburg: European Foundation Centre; 1995. Report No. EFC2824.
  10. BERR Improving outcomes from health and safety. A report to Government by the better regulation executive. London: Department for Business Enterprises and Regulatory Reform; 2008 August. 29 p. Report No. 224.
  11. HSE. Making an impact on SME compliance behaviour: an evaluation of the effect of interventions upon compliance with health and safety legislation in small and medium sized enterprises. Kings College London; Health and Safety Executive; 2005. 66 p. Report No. 366.
  12. OSHA. Occupational safety and health and economic performance in small and medium-sized enterprises: a review [cited 2011 March 14]. In: Working environment information - working paper, 7. The EU-OSHA Occupational Health and Safety Administration. 2009. p. 5-8. Available from: http://osha.europa.eu/en/publications/reports/TE8009640ENN_occupational_safety_health_econom ic_performance small_ medium.
  13. Arewa AO, Farrell P. A review of compliance with health and safety and safety regulations and economic performance in construction SMEs. In: Proceedings of the 28th ARCOM conference, September 3rd - 5th Edinburgh, Scotland 2012. 231 p.
  14. Knutt E. Warburtons hit with ${\pounds}2m$ fine for worker's mixer fall [Internet]. Health + Safety at work Magazine. 2017 [cited 2017 May 19]. Available from: https://www.healthandsafetyatwork.com/work-at-height/warburtons-fineworkers-mixer-fall.
  15. Sheret R. The shape of future health and safety fines; (2016) [Internet]; 2017 [cited 2017 May 29]. Available from: https://www.solicitorsjournal.com/ comment/ shape-future-health-and-safety-fines.
  16. IOSH. Health and safety sentencing guidelines one year on: the rise in fines and the actions companies can take to prevent them. A joint report by the Institution of Occupational Safety and Health (IOSH) and Osborne Clarke; 2017. p. 01-3. Report No. MKT4163/260117.
  17. HSE. Managing for health and safety. Guidance for regulatory staff on the practice of assessing health and safety management. Sudbury, Suffolk: Health and Safety Executive Books; 2010. 25 p.
  18. HSE. Firm fines ${\pounds}1million$ after young worker killed by exploding tyre [Internet]; 2017 [cited 2017 March 7]. Health and Safety Executive Brief. Available from: http://press.hse.gov.uk/2016/firm-fines-1million-after-youngworker-killed-by-exploding-tyre/.
  19. DWF. Magistrates can now levy unlimited fines in Health & Safety cases [Internet]; 2015 [cited 2016 November 22]. Available from: https://www.dwf.law/news-events/legal-updates/2015/03/magistrates-can-now-levyunlimited-fines-in-health-safety-cases/.
  20. HSE. Industries. Estimated rate of self-reported work-related illness and nonfatal injury by industry1 for people working in the last 12 months [Internet]; 2017 [cited 2017 February 7]. Health and Safety Executive article. Available from: http://www.hse.gov.uk/Statistics/industry/.
  21. Miceli TJ, Bucci C. "A simple theory of increasing penalties for repeat offenders" economics working papers; 2004. 39 p.
  22. Polinsky AM, Shavell S. The Economic theory of public law enforcement. J Econ Lit 2000;38:76.
  23. Tashakkori A, Teddlie C. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioural research. 1st ed. New York. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2003. 42 p.
  24. Somekh B, Lewin C. Research methods in the social sciences. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Sage; 2005. 37 p.
  25. Creswell JW. Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications; 2003. p. 11-39.
  26. HSE. Better business [Internet]; 2009 [cited 2012 May 19]. Health and Safety Executive article. Available from: http://www.hse.gov.uk/betterbusiness/large/index.htm.
  27. Gaskell G, Bauer MW. Towards public accountability: beyond sampling, reliability and validity. In: Bauer MW, Gaskell G, editors. Qualitative research with text, image and sound. London: Sage; 2000. p. 336-50.
  28. Kvale S. InterViews: an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. London: Sage; 1996. 37 p.
  29. Kuzmanic M. Validity in qualitative research: interview and the appearance of truth through dialogue. Horizons Psychol 2009;18(2):39-50.
  30. OECD. Guidance on developing safety performance indicators related to chemical accident prevention, preparedness and response guidance for industry. The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development OCED Environment, health and safety; 2008. 34 p. Report No. 19.