Nuclear Engineering and Technology

Korean Nuclear Society (한국원자력학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Mechanical analysis of the bow deformation of a row of fuel assemblies in a PWR core

  • Wanninger, Andreas (Technical University of Munich, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Chair of Nuclear Technology) ;
  • Seidl, Marcus (PreussenElektra GmbH) ;
  • Macian-Juan, Rafael (Technical University of Munich, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Chair of Nuclear Technology)
  • Received : 2017.11.08
  • Accepted : 2017.12.21
  • Published : 2018.03.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Fuel assembly (FA) bow in pressurized water reactor (PWR) cores is considered to be a complex process with a large number of influencing mechanisms and several unknowns. Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses are a common way to assess the predictability of such complex phenomena. To perform such analyses, a structural model of a row of 15 FAs in the reactor core is implemented with the finite-element code ANSYS Mechanical APDL. The distribution of lateral hydraulic forces within the core row is estimated based on a two-dimensional Computational Fluid Dynamics model with porous media, assuming symmetric or asymmetric core inlet and outlet flow profiles. The influence of the creep rate on the bow amplitude is tested based on different creep models for guide tubes and fuel rods. Different FA initial states are considered: fresh FAs or FAs with higher burnup, which may be initially straight or exhibit an initial bow from previous cycles. The simulation results over one reactor cycle demonstrate that changes in the creep rate and the hydraulic conditions may have a considerable impact on the bow amplitudes and the bow patterns. A good knowledge of the specific creep behavior and the hydraulic conditions is therefore crucial for making reliable predictions.

Keywords

References

  1. G. Gentet, C. Hintergraber, P. Louf, N. Teboul C. Wiltz, Areva product experience in support of EPR fuel design, In: TopFuel 2012 Transactions, Manchester, UK, September 2-6, 2012.
  2. A. Wanninger, M. Seidl R. Macian-Juan, Development of computational methods to describe the mechanical behavior of PWR fuel assemblies, In: Proceedings of the 47th Annual Meeting on Nuclear Technology (AMNT 2016), Hamburg, Germany, May 10-12, 2016.
  3. A. Wanninger, M. Seidl R. Macian-Juan, Screening sensitivity analysis of a PWR fuel assembly FEM structural model, In: TopFuel 2016 Conference Proceedings, Boise, USA, September 11-16, 2016.
  4. RSK, Verformungen von Brennelementen in deutschen Druckwasserreaktoren (DWR), RSK-Stellungnahme (474. Sitzung der Reaktor-Sicherheitskommission (RSK) am 18.03.2015), 2015 [In German].
  5. P. Yvon, J. Diz N. Ligneau, Irradiation creep and growth of guide Thimble alloys, In: Proceedings of the International Symposium Fontevraud IV, Paris, France, September 14-18, 1998.
  6. K. Pettersson, Evaluation of Results from an In-pile Creep Test in the Studsvik R2 Reactor, SKI, Report 02:48, Stockholm, Sweden, 2002.
  7. G. Wikmark, L. Hallstadius, K. Yueh, Cladding to sustain corrosion, creep and growth at high burn-ups, Nuclear Eng. Technol. 41 (2009) 143-148. https://doi.org/10.5516/NET.2009.41.2.143
  8. M.A. McGrath, S. Yagnik, Experimental investigation of irradiation creep and growth of recrystallized Zircaloy-4 guide tubes pre-irradiated in PWR, J. ASTM Int. 8 (2011) 875-898.
  9. N.E. Todreas, M.S. Kazimi, Nuclear Systems, second ed., vol. 1, CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA, 2012.
  10. I.E. Idelchik, Handbook of Hydraulic Resistance, third ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA, 1994.
  11. J. Peybernes, Evaluation of the forces generated by cross-flow on PWR fuel assembly, in: IAEA-TECDOC-1454 Structural Behaviour of Fuel Assemblies for Water Cooled Reactors, Vienna, Austria, 2005.
  12. A. Seibold, F. Garzarolli R. Manzel, Material development for Siemens fuel elements, In: International Topical Meeting on Light Water Reactor Fuel Performance, Park City, USA, April 10-13, 2000.

Cited by

  1. Parametric study on the structural response of a high burnup spent nuclear fuel rod under drop impact considering post-irradiated fuel conditions vol.52, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2019.10.022
  2. Detailed Simulation of the Nominal Flow and Temperature Conditions in a Pre-Konvoi PWR Using Coupled CFD and Neutron Kinetics vol.5, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids5030161
  3. NEUTRON NOISE PATTERNS FROM COUPLED FUEL-ASSEMBLY VIBRATIONS vol.247, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202124702015
  4. Semi-analytical modeling of the flow redistribution upstream from the mixing grids in a context of nuclear fuel assembly bow vol.371, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2020.110940
  5. Nonlinear dynamics of flexible slender structures moving in a limited space with application in nuclear reactors vol.104, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-021-06582-1