DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Direct membrane filtration of wastewater under very short hydraulic retention time

  • Received : 2018.04.02
  • Accepted : 2018.04.09
  • Published : 2018.03.25

Abstract

Direct membrane filtration (DMF) of wastewater has many advantages over conventional biological wastewater treatment processes. DMF is not only compact, but potentially energy efficient due to the lack of biological aeration. It also produces more biosolids that can be used to produce methane gas through anaerobic digestion. Most of ammoniacal nitrogen in wastewater is preserved in effluent and is used as fertilizer when effluent is recycled for irrigation. In this study, a technical feasibility of DMF was explored. Organic and nitrogen removal efficiencies were compared between DMF and membrane bioreactor (MBR). Despite the extremely high F/V ratio, e.g., $14.4kg\;COD/m^3/d$, DMF provided very high COD removal efficiencies at ~93%. Soluble microbial products (SMP) and extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) were less in DMF sludge, but membrane fouling rate was far greater than in MBR. The diversity of microbial community in DMF appeared very narrow based on the morphological observation using optical microscope. On the contrary, highly diverse microbial community was observed in the MBR. Microorganisms tended to form jelly globs and attach on reactor wall in DMF. FT-IR study revealed that the biological globs were structurally supported by feather-like materials made of secondary amines. Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) study showed microorganisms mainly resided on the external surface of microbial globs rather than the internal spaces.

Keywords

References

  1. Atekwanan, E.A., Atekwana, E.A., Rowe, R.S., Werkema, D.D. and Legall, F.D. (2004), "The relationship of total dissolved solids measurements to bulk electrical conductivity in an aquifer contaminated with hydrocarbon", J. Appl. Geophys., 56(4), 281-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-9851(04)00057-6
  2. Baker, A. (2001), "Fluorescence excitation-emission matrix characterization of some sewage-impacted rivers", Environ. Sci. Technol., 35(5), 948-953. https://doi.org/10.1021/es000177t
  3. Basaran, S.T., Aysel, M., Kurt, H., Ergal, I., Kumru, M., Akarsubasi, A., Sozen, S. and Orhon, D. (2012), "Removal of readily biodegradable substrate in super fast membrane bioreactor", J. Membr. Sci., 423, 477-486.
  4. Bendick, J.A., Miller, C.J., Kindle, B.J., Shan, H., Vidic, R.D. and Neufeld, R.D. (2005), "Pilot scale demonstration of cross-flow ceramic membrane microfiltration for treatment of combined and sanitary sewer overflows", J. Environ. Eng., 131(11), 1532-1539. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2005)131:11(1532)
  5. Bendick, J.A., Modise, C.M., Miller, C.J., Neufeld, R.D. and Vidic, R.D. (2004), "Application of cross-flow microfiltration for the treatment of combined sewer overflow wastewater", J. Environ. Eng., 130(12), 1442-1449. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2004)130:12(1442)
  6. Chang, I.S. and Lee, C.H. (1998), "Membrane filtration characteristics in membrane-coupled activated sludge system-the effect of physiological states of activated sludge on membrane fouling", Desalination, 120(3), 221-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(98)00220-3
  7. Chen, W., Westerhoff, P., Leenheer, J.A. and Booksh, K. (2003), "Fluorescence excitation-emission matrix Regional integration to quantify spectra for dissolved organic matter", Environ. Sci. Technol., 37(24), 5701-5710. https://doi.org/10.1021/es034354c
  8. Coble, P.G. (1996), "Characterization of marine and terrestrial DOM in seawater using excitation-emission matrix spectroscopy", Mar. Chem. 51(4), 325-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4203(95)00062-3
  9. Cote, P. and Thompson, D. (2000), "Wastewater treatment using membranes: The North American experience", Water Sci. Technol., 41(10-11), 209-215. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2000.0644
  10. Diamantis, V.I., Antoniou, I., Melidis, P. and Aivasidis, A. (2009), "Direct membrane filtration of sewage using aerated flat sheet membranes", Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology, Chania, Crete, Greece, September.
  11. Dubois, M., Gilles, K.A., Hamilton, J.K., Rebers, P.A. and Smith, F. (1956), "Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances", Anal. Chem., 28(3), 350-356. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60111a017
  12. Geider, R.J. and La Roche, J. (2002), "Redfield revisited: Variability of C:N:P in marine microalgae and its biochemical basis", Eur. J. Phycol., 37(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0967026201003456
  13. Hwang, B.K., Lee, C.H., Chang, I.S., Drews, A. and Field, R. (2012), "Membrane bioreactor: TMP rise and characterization of bio-cake strcutrue using CLSM-image analysis", J. Membr. Sci., 419, 33-41.
  14. Jarusutthirak, C. and Amy, G. (2006), "Role of soluble microbial products (SMP) in membrane fouling and flux decline", Environ. Sci. Technol., 40(3), 969-974. https://doi.org/10.1021/es050987a
  15. Mezohegyi, G., Bilad, M.R. and Vankelecom, I.F.J. (2012), "Direct sewage up-concentration by submerged aerated and vibrated membranes", Bioresour. Technol., 118, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.05.022
  16. Mukundakrishnan, K., Quan, S., Eckmann, D.M. and Ayyaswamy, P.S. (2007), "Numerical study of wall effects on buoyant gas-bubble rise in a liquid-filled finite cylinder", Phys. Rev. E, 76(3), 036308. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.76.036308
  17. Sierra, M.M., Glovanela, M., Parlanti, E. and Soriano-Sierra, E.J. (2005), "Fluorescence fingerprint of fulvic and humic acids from varied origins as viewed by single-scan and excitation/emission matrix techniques", Chemosphere, 58(6), 715-733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.09.038
  18. Sutton, P.M., Melcer, H., Schraa, O.J. and Togna, A.P. (2011), "Treating municipal wastewater with the goal of resource recovery", Water Sci. Technol., 63(1), 25-31. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2011.004
  19. Till, S.W., Judd, S.J. and McLoughlin, B. (1998), "Reduction of fecal coliform bacteria in sewage effluents using microporous polymeric membrane", Water Res., 32(5), 373-382.
  20. Wang, Z., Wu, Z. and Tang, S. (2009), "Characterization of dissolved organic matter in a submerged membrane bioreactor by using three-dimensional excitation and emission matrix fluorescence spectroscopy", Water Res., 43(6), 1533-1540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2008.12.033
  21. Wu, B., Kitade, T., Chong, T.H., Uemura, T. and Fane, A.G. (2013), "Impact of membrane bioreactor operating conditions on fouling behavior of reverse osmosis membranes in MBR-RO processes", Desalination, 311, 37-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2012.11.020
  22. Yoon, S.H. (2016), Membrane Bioreactor Processes: Principles and Applications, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, U.S.A.