Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment (환경영향평가)

Korean Society of Environmental Impact Assessment (한국환경영향평가학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation Criteria of Biodiversity in Ecosystem Protected Areas - In Mt. Jiri and Mt. Bukhan National Parks -

생태계 보호지역의 생물다양성 평가지표 선정 및 적용 연구 - 지리산 및 북한산 국립공원을 중심으로 -

  • Kang, Hae-In (Department of Forest Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kang, Kyu-Suk (Department of Forest Sciences, Seoul National University)
  • 강혜인 (서울대학교 농업생명과학대학 산림과학부) ;
  • 강규석 (서울대학교 농업생명과학대학 산림과학부)
  • Received : 2017.11.24
  • Accepted : 2018.03.28
  • Published : 2018.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

For conservation of biodiversity, we designate and manage the major areas that are habitats of organisms as ecosystem protected areas. It is necessary to evaluate the biodiversity of protected areas relatively in order to establish strategies to protect and secure the biodiversity of protected areas. In this study, we selected evaluation indicators by which we can compare objectively the biodiversity of protected areas corresponding to forest ecosystem, and applied them to Mt. Jiri and Mt. Bukhan National Parks. We reviewed literatures to select evaluation criteria. Frequently mentioned criteria and the structure of the forest which plays an importantrole of forest biodiversity were selected as the evaluation criteria. As the result, the selected evaluation indicators were 7-species diversity, species richness, evenness, rarity, disturbance species, indigenous species, and forest structure. In Mt. Jiri and Mt. Bukhan National Parks, species diversity were 3.492 and 2.943, species richness were 8.998 and 9.793, evenness were 0.849 and 0.680,rarity were 11.976 and 10.783, and disturbance species index were 0.214 and 0.357 respectively. Both national parks had abundant indigenous species and showed various forest physiognomies and stable 4-layer structure. It was found that crown density was higher in Mt. Jiri. Most indicators were implied high biodiversity in Mt. Jiri and Mt. Bukhan national parks.

생물다양성을 보전하기 위하여 생물의 서식처가 되는 주요 지역을 생태계 보호지역으로 지정하여 관리하고 있다. 보호지역의 생물다양성의 보존 및 확보 전략 수립에 타당성을 부여하기 위해서 보호지역간 생물다양성을 상대적으로 평가할 필요가 있다. 본 연구에서는 산림생태계에 해당하는 보호지역의 생물다양성을 객관적으로 비교할 수 있는 평가지표를 선정하였고, 이를 지리산 국립공원과 북한산 국립공원의 생물다양성 비교에 적용하였다. 평가지표를 선정하기 위해서 문헌 조사를 실시하였다. 언급된 빈도가 높은 지표들과 산림 생물다양성에서 중요한 역할을 하는 산림구조를 평가지표로 선정하였다. 이를 통해 선정된 평가지표는 총 7개로 종다양도, 종풍부도, 균등도, 희귀성, 교란종, 고유생물자원 및 산림구조이다. 지리산 국립공원과 북한산 국립공원에서 종다양도는 3.492와 2.943, 종풍부도는 8.998과 9.793, 균등도는 0.849와 0.680, 희귀성지수는 11.976과 10.783, 교란종지수는 0.214과 0.357으로 나타났다. 두 국립공원 모두에서 고유생물자원은 풍부하게 나타났다. 산림구조는 다양한 임상을 보이고 안정적인 4층 구조를 이루고 있으며 수관울폐도는 지리산 국립공원에서 더 높게 나타났다. 대부분의 평가지표에서 지리산 국립공원의 생물다양성이 북한산 국립공원보다 높은 것으로 평가되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bazzaz FA. 1979. The physiological ecology of plant succession. Animal reservation ecological system. 10: 351-371. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.10.110179.002031
  2. Han BH, Kim JH, Hong SH. 2003. The Monitoring and Ecological Restoration Concept of Ecosystem Conservation Area in Dunchon. KJEE. 17(3): 242-257. [Korean Literature]
  3. Heo HY, Park SY, Jung YS, Cho DG, Shim YJ, Ryu YJ. 2016. A Study on the Expansion Plan for the Protected Areas by Discovering Protected Area Candidates. Proc. Korean Soc. Environ. Ecol. Con. 26(2): 52-53. [Korean Literature]
  4. Hong SH, Kim JS. 2013. Relationship between Bird Appearance and Urban Forest Vegetation. Proc. Korean Soc. Environ. Ecol. Con. 23(1): 66-67. [Korean Literature]
  5. Jung DJ, Kang KH, Heo J, Kim CJ, Kim SH, Lee JB. 2010. Mapping for Biodiversity Using National Forest Inventory Data and GIS. J. Environ. Impact Assess. 19(6): 573-581. [Korean Literature]
  6. Jung DJ, Kang KH, Heo J, Sohn MS, Kim HS. 2011. Valuation of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Using National Forest Inventory Data. J. Environ. Impact Assess. 20(5): 615-625. [Korean Literature]
  7. Ki GJ, Choi SW. 2004. Butterfly Population Dynamics at Mt. Yudal, Mokpo, Korea. Korea J. Environ. Biol. 22(1): 35-42. [Korean Literature]
  8. Kim JW, Jung YK. 1995. Ecological Division of Habitats by Analysis of Vegetation Structure and Soil Environment-A case Study on the Vegetation in the Kimpo Landfills and Its Periphery Region-. Korean J. Ecol. 18(3): 307-321. [Korean Literature]
  9. Kim CH, Myung H, Shin BC. 1999. Species Diversity of Forest Vegetation in Mt. Jangan, Chollabuk-do. Kor. J. Env. Eco. 13(3): 271-289. [Korean Literature]
  10. Kim SH, Oh CH. 2016. Management Plan of The Heonilleung Ecological Scenery conservation Area. Proc. Korean Soc. Environ. Ecol. Con. 26(2): 49-50. [Korean Literature]
  11. Kim JS, Lee SD, Kim H, Cho BG. 2017. Correlation between Environmental factors and Butterfly Communities in major mountains of Honam-jeongmaek and Keumnamhonam-jeongmaek. Proc. Korean Soc. Environ. Ecol. Con. 27(2): 28-29. [Korean Literature]
  12. Kimes DS, Ranson KJ, Sun G, Blair JB. 2006. Predicting lidar measured forest vertical structure from multi-angle spectral data. Remote sensing of environment. 100: 503-511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2005.11.004
  13. Koo MH, Lee DK. 2012. A Study on the National and International Research Trend of Biodiversity Assessment method and Its Application of Environmental Impact Assessment. J. Environ. Impact Assess. 21(1) : 119-132. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.14249/EIA.2012.21.1.119
  14. Korea National Park. 2010. Mt. Jiri national park Resource Monitoring. Gyeongnam, Republic of Korea. [Korean Literature]
  15. Korea National Park. 2011. Mt. Jiri national park natural resource survey. Gyeongnam, Republic of Korea. [Korean Literature]
  16. Korea National Park. 2014. Mt. Bukhan national park Resource Monitoring. Seoul, Republic of Korea. [Korean Literature]
  17. Kown HS. 2011. Integrated Evaluation Model of Biodiversity for Conservation Planning: Focused on Mt. Jiri, Mt. Deokyu and Mt. Gaya regions. Ph.D. dissertation, Seoul National University, Seoul. [Korean Literature]
  18. Lee JB. 2008. A Study on Floristic Biodiversity and Ecological Data Acquisition Methods Using Remote Sensing. M.S. dissertation, Yonsei University, Seoul. [Korean Literature]
  19. Lee CM, Kwon TS. 2012. Characterization of the Butterfly Community of a Fragmented Urban Forest, Hongneung Forest. Korean J. Appl. Entomol. 51(4): 317-323. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.5656/KSAE.2012.07.0.040
  20. Margalef DR. 1958. Information theory in ecology. International Journal of General Systems. 3: 36-71.
  21. Myeong HH, Oh JG, Won HJ, Shin YS. 2016. A Study on the Advancement Planning and Ecosystem Health Assessment in National Park. Proc. Korean Soc. Environ. Ecol. Con. 26(1): 57-58. [Korean Literature]
  22. National Institute of Ecology. 2015. 4th National natural environment survey: Seoul and Pocheon: Vegetation. Seocheon, Republic of Korea. [Korean Literature]
  23. National Institute of Ecology. 2016a. 4th National natural environment survey: Jeonnam 01: Vegetation. Seocheon, Republic of Korea. [Korean Literature]
  24. National Institute of Ecology. 2016b. Alien species. Sejong, Republic of Korea. [Korean Literature]
  25. Odum EP. 1969. The strategy of ecosystem development. Science. 164: 262-270. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.164.3877.262
  26. Oh KK, Kim DG, Kim CE. 2008. Distribution of Actual Vegetation and Management of Bukhansan National Park. Kor. J. Env. Eco. 22(2): 83-97. [Korean Literature]
  27. Oh JG, Won HJ, Myeong HH, Kim JW. 2015. Natural Ecosystem Health Assessment of Korea National Parks resource management plan. Proc. Korean Soc. Environ. Ecol. con. 25(2): 103-104. [Korean Literature]
  28. Oh JG, Won HJ, Myeong HH. 2016. A Study on the Method of Ecosystem Health Assessment in National Parks. KJEE. 49(2): 147-152. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.11614/KSL.2016.49.2.147
  29. Park YH, Lee HW, Kim KG, Lee GG, Choi JY, Heo SJ, Seo GW. 2008. Development of Designation Criteria for Ecological Protected Areas and its Application Methodology. J. Environ. Impact Assess. 17(3): 177-188. [Korean Literature]
  30. Park EH, Oh CH. 2014. A Study on Surveying and Improving Management of Jingwan- dong Ecological and Scenery Conservation Area in Seoul. Proc. Korean Soc. Environ. Ecol. Con. 24(1): 83-84. [Korean Literature]
  31. Pielou EC. 1966. Shannon's formula as a measure of specific diversity: Its use and misuse. The American Naturalist. 100(914): 463-365. https://doi.org/10.1086/282439
  32. Pielou EC. 1975. Ecological diversity. John Wiley & Sons Inc. pp. 165.
  33. Ryu JE. 2010. Diversity Assessment of Forest structure to improve Biodiversity. M.S. dissertation, Seoul National University, Seoul. [Korean Literature]
  34. Shim JH, Chung KH. 1997. Studies on the Herpetofauna for the Biodiversity Conservation of Population Community Analysis and Species Diversity in the Gyebangsan Area Kangwondo. Kor. J. Env. Eco. 11(1): 84-99. [Korean Literature]
  35. Shin HT. 2000. Study on Assessment of Ecosystem Conservation Area Based on Priority. Ph.D. dissertation, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan. [Korean Literature]
  36. Shin HT, Kim YS. 2001. Review for Evaluation criteria for the Establishment of Conservation Areas in Korea. Kor. J. Env. Eco. 15(3): 247-256. [Korean Literature]
  37. Sim WD, Park JW, Lee JS. 2014. Evaluation of Biodiversity Based on Changes of Spatial Scale -A Case Study of Baekdudaegan Area in Kangwondo-. J. For. Sci. 30(1): 91-100. [Korean Literature]
  38. Sung HC, Hwang SY, Chae MO, Park ES. 2010. Basic Study on Criteria for Setting Natural Conservation Area. J. Korean Env. Res. Tech. 13(6): 1-12. [Korean Literature]
  39. Sung JW. 2017. Assessment of Protected Areas in Korea Applied by the Key Biodiversity Areas(KBAs). Ph.D. dissertation, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan. [Korean Literature]
  40. Usher MB. 1996. Wildlife conservation evaluation: Attributes criteria and values. Chapman & Hall. pp. 3-44.
  41. Yoo SH, Lee KS, Park CH. 2012. Landscape Ecological Evaluation for Avian Fauna Habitats at the Forest Swamp Minefields of Civilian Control Zone(CCZ) Close to the Demilitarized Zone(DMZ) of Korea. Kor. J. Env. Eco. 26(2): 247-256. [Korean Literature]
  42. You JH, Jung SG, Oh JH. 2005. Construction of System on Assessment Indicators for Conservation of Sustainable Natural Ecosystem. Kor. J. Env. Eco. 19(3): 287-298. [Korean Literature]