디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제16권4호
  • /
  • Pages.69-77
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

공유리더십이 혁신행동에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 - 신뢰의 조절효과

A Study on the effect of Shared Leadership to Innovation Behavior - The moderate effect of Trust -

  • 이선규 (금오공과대학교 경영학과) ;
  • 노연숙 (금오공과대학교 경영학과) ;
  • 강은구 (금오공과대학교 경영학과)
  • Lee, Sun-kyu (Business School, Kumoh National Institute of Technology) ;
  • Noh, Yeon-sook (Business School, Kumoh National Institute of Technology) ;
  • Kang, Eun-gu (Business School, Kumoh National Institute of Technology)
  • 투고 : 2018.01.31
  • 심사 : 2018.04.20
  • 발행 : 2018.04.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

최근 조직은 팀을 중심으로 하는 기업 구조의 변화를 겪고 있다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 팀 리더십의 중심인 공유리더십과 구성원의 혁신행동과의 관계를 살펴보고, 이들의 관계에서 신뢰가 어떠한 조절 역할을 수행하는지를 파악하고자 한다. 이를 위해, 문헌조사를 통해 공유리더십이 혁신행동에 영향을 미칠 것 이라는 연구모형 및 가설을 설정하였다. 또한, 이들의 관계에서 신뢰의 조절효과를 파악하였다. 실증분석을 위해, 대구 경북 지역의 대기업에 종사하는 조직 구성원을 대상으로 설문조사를 진행하였고, 다중회귀분석 및 계층적 회귀분석을 실시하여 가설검증을 실시하였다. 분석결과, 공유리더십은 혁신행동에 유의미한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 특히, 구성원간의 신뢰는 공유리더십과 혁신행동의 관계를 조절하는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 연구 결과는 인적자원의 중요성이 증대되는 현 시점에서의 기업 조직의 주요한 전략적 인적자원활용 방안으로 활용 될 것이다.

In this study, we examine the relationship between shared leadership and innovation behaviors of the members, and try to understand what moderate effect trust in these relationships. To do this, we set up research models and hypotheses that shared leadership will influence innovative behavior through literature review. We also added the moderating effect of Trust on the relationship between these variables. For the empirical analysis, a questionnaire survey was conducted for corporate member in Daegu and Kyungbuk area. Multiple regression analysis and hierarchical regression analysis were conducted to test hypotheses. As a result, Shared leadership has a significant effect on innovation behavior. In particular, trust among members has been shown to regulate the relationship between shared leadership and innovation behavior. The results of this study will be applied to the strategic human resources management of major organizations.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Avolio, B. J., Jung, D. I., Murry, W. & Sivasbramaniam, N. (1996). Building highly developed teams: Focusing on shared leadership process, efficacy, trust, and performance.
  2. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  3. Barney, J. B., &Hansen, M. H. (1994). Trustworthiness as a source of competitive advantage. Strategic management journal, 15(S1), 175-190. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150912
  4. Bouty, I. (2000). Interpersonal and interaction influences on informal resource exchanges between R&D researchers across organizational boundaries. Academy of Management Journal, 43(1), 50-65. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556385
  5. Carson, J. B., Tesluk, P. E. & Marrone, J. A. (2007). Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of management Journal, 50(5), 1217-1234. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159921
  6. Cooke, P., & Wills, D.(1999). Small firms, social capital and the enhancement of business performance through innovation programmes. Small business economics, 13(3), 219-234. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008178808631
  7. Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of management journal, 34(3), 555-590.
  8. Ensley, M. D., Hmieleski, K. M., &Pearce, C. L. (2006). The importance of vertical and shared leadership within new venture top management teams: Implications for the performance of startups. The leadership quarterly, 17(3), 217-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.02.002
  9. Ensley, M. D., Pearson, A., &Pearce, C. L. (2003). Top management team process, shared leadership, and new venture performance: A theoretical model and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 13(2), 329-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(03)00020-2
  10. E. G. Kang, S. K. Lee. (2017). A Study on the effect of Perceived Organizational Support to Organizational Citizenship Behavior in the convergence age. The Journal of Digital Policy & Management, 15(9), 99-110.
  11. Georgianna, S. (2007). Self-leadership: a cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(6), 569-589. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710778440
  12. Hiller, C. E., Refshauge, K. M., Bundy, A. C., Herbert, R. D., &Kilbreath, S. L. (2006). The Cumberland ankle instability tool: a report of validity and reliability testing. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 87(9), 1235-1241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2006.05.022
  13. Hoch, J. E. (2013). Shared leadership and innovation: The role of vertical leadership and employee integrity. Journal of Business and Psychology, 28(2), 159-174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-012-9273-6
  14. Ivey, M., &Sanders, E. (2006). Designing a physical environment for co-experience and assessing participant use. In Wonderground, Design Research Society International Conference (pp. 1-35).
  15. Jackson, S. E., DeNisi, A. & Hitt, M. A. (Eds.). (2003). Managing knowledge for sustained competitive advantage: Designing strategies for effective human resource management (Vol. 21). John Wiley & Sons.
  16. Janssen, I., Heymsfield, S. B., Wang, Z. & Ross, R. (2000). Skeletal muscle mass and distribution in 468 men and women aged 18-88 yr. Journal of applied physiology, 89(1), 81-88. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.2000.89.1.81
  17. Jones, G. R. & George, J. M. (1998). The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. Academy of management review, 23(3), 531-546. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926625
  18. Kayes, A. B., Kayes, D. C. & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Experiential learning in teams. Simulation & Gaming, 36(3), 330-354. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878105279012
  19. M. Y. Kim & Y. S. Lee. (2000). The foundation of trust and distrust that the subordinates have in the Korean corporate organization. Korean Journal of Psychology: Cultural and Social Issues, 6(3), 99-120.
  20. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H. & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of management review, 20(3), 709-734. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335
  21. McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of management journal, 38(1), 24-59.
  22. Mehra, A., Smith, B. R., Dixon, A. L. & Robertson, B. (2006). Distributed leadership in teams: The network of leadership perceptions and team performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(3), 232-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.02.003
  23. Neck, C. P., & Houghton, J. D. (2006). Two decades of self-leadership theory and research: Past developments, present trends, and future possibilities. Journal of managerial psychology, 21(4), 270-295. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610663097
  24. Olivotto, I. A., Bajdik, C. D., Ravdin, P. M., Speers, C. H., Coldman, A. J., Norris, B. D., & Gelmon, K. A. (2005). Population-based validation of the prognostic model ADJUVANT! for early breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 23(12), 2716-2725. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.06.178
  25. O'Toole, M. (2002). The relationship between employees' perceptions of safety and organizational culture. Journal of safety research, 33(2), 231-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4375(02)00014-2
  26. Pearce, C. L. (2007). The future of leadership development: The importance of identity, multi-level approaches, self-leadership, physical fitness, shared leadership, networking, creativity, emotions, spirituality and on-boarding processes. Human Resource Management Review, 17(4), 355-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2007.08.006
  27. Pearce, C. L. & Sims Jr, H. P. (2002). Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, and empowering leader behaviors. Group dynamics: Theory, research, and practice, 6(2), 172. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.6.2.172
  28. J. G. Seo & A. J. Hong. (2015). The Effects of Shared Leadership on Innovative Behavior and Mediating Effects of Unsupervised Learning and Job Cohesiveness. Journal of Business Research, 28(3), 981-1008.
  29. Sivasubramaniam, N., Murry, W. D., Avolio, B. J. & Jung, D. I. (2002). A longitudinal model of the effects of team leadership and group potency on group performance. Group & Organization Management, 27(1), 66-96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601102027001005
  30. J. S. Song & P. S. Yang. (2009). Mediating effects of psychological empowerment on the relationship between supervisor trust and innovation behavior. Industrial Economics Research, 22(5), 2437-2455.
  31. S. K. Lee, E. G. Kang, S. D. Goo. (2017). A Study on the effect of Empowering Leadership to Organizational Citizenship Behavior - Mediating Effect of Self-Leadership. The Journal of Digital Policy & Management, 15(11), 209-220.
  32. S. K. Lee, K. H. Son, E. G. Kang, Y. H. Kim. (2014). A Study on the Influence of Empowering-Leadership to Creativity and Job attitude. The Journal of Digital Policy & Management, 12(8), 85-99.
  33. Van de Ven, A. H. (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management science, 32(5), 590-607. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.590
  34. Waddock, S. A., &Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic management journal, 303-319.
  35. D. M. Yang, H. J. No & D. S. Sim. (2012). The Effects of Shared Leadership on Team Efficacy and Team Commitment in Project Team - Verification of Mediating Effects of Task Adjustment and Task Sharing. Business Management Research (formerly Dongrim Management), 42(single issue), 127-147.
  36. Yukl, G. (1999). An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. The leadership quarterly, 10(2), 285-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(99)00013-2
  37. Yukl, G., & Mahsud, R. (2010). Why flexible and adaptive leadership is essential. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 62(2), 81. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019835
  38. Amabile, T. M. (1998). How to kill creativity (Vol. 87). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.
  39. Ciancutti, A., & Steding, T. L. (2001). Built on trust: Gaining competitive advantage in any organization.
  40. Cohen, D., & Prusak, L. (2000). In good company: The role of social capital in organizations. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
  41. Covey, S. R. (1990). The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People: Powerful Lessons in Personal Change Publisher.
  42. Katz, D.,& Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (Vol. 2). New York: Wiley.
  43. Kanter, R. M. (1988). Three tiers for innovation research. Communication Research, 15(5), 509-523. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365088015005001
  44. Pearce, C. L., & Conger, J. A. (2002). Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership. Sage.
  45. Robinson, S. L. (1996). Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Administrative science quarterly, 574-599.