DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

미국 컴퓨터교육 프레임워크 분석을 통한 Computational Thinking의 개념과 교육과정 편성의 시사점 분석

The Concept of Computational Thinking through Analysis of Computer Education Framework in the United States and its Implications for the Curriculum of Software Education

  • 신승기 (대구교육대학교 글로벌교육혁신연구소) ;
  • 배영권 (대구교육대학교 컴퓨터교육과)
  • Shin, Seungki (Institute of Global Education for the Advancement of Innovative Learning, Daegu National University of Education) ;
  • Bae, Youngkwon (Dept. of Computer Education, Daegu National University of Education)
  • 투고 : 2018.04.19
  • 심사 : 2018.04.24
  • 발행 : 2018.04.30

초록

본 연구에서는 우리나라의 소프트웨어 교육과정 편성과 Computational Thinking에 대한 개념정립을 위하여 미국의 K12CS에서 제시한 컴퓨터교육 프레임워크를 분석함으로써 시사점을 도출하고자 하였다. 첫 번째로 우리나라에서 Computational Thinking에 대한 용어를 컴퓨팅 사고력으로 사용하는 부분에 대해서 미국의 교육과정에 제시된 개념과 비교하여 살펴보았으며, 컴퓨팅 사고력과 Computational Thinking은 문제 해결의 초점과 범위가 다름을 살펴볼 수 있었다. 두 번째로, 우리나라의 소프트웨어 교육과정은 학교급 및 학년에 따른 위계가 고려되지 않는다는 점을 고려하여 미국의 K12CS에서 제시하고 있는 핵심 역량을 토대로 재구성하여 교육과정 체계를 제시하였다.

In this study, we conducted to derive some implications by analyzing the computer education framework proposed by K12CS in the United States in order to organize the software curriculum and conceptualization of computational thinking in Korea. First, we discussed the use of the term Computational Thinking as a Computing Thinking in Korea and compare it with the concept presented in the US curriculum. we derived that Computing Thinking and Computational Thinking are different in the focus and scope of problem solving. Second, considering the fact that Korean software curriculum does not consider the hierarchy according to the school and the grade, we reconstructed the curriculum based on the core practices and concepts which were suggested by the organization of K-12 Computer Science in the United States.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Australian Curriculum(2015). Curriculum of Digital Technologies. Retrieved from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/technologies/digital-technologies/curriculum/f-10?layout=1
  2. Bae. Y., Shin, S. (2017, August). The Study on Analysis of the Implications for the Software Education through Case Studies of Applications in the World of Computational Thinking. KAIE Research Journal. Vol 8, No. 2. pp.143-156.
  3. Bundy, A. (2007). Computational thinking is pervasive. Journal of Scientific and Practical Computing, 1(2), 67-69.
  4. Computer Science Teachers Association (CSTA) and the International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) (2011). Computational Thinking Teacher Resources. Second Edition.
  5. Department for Education in U.K (2014, June). Interim KS5 minimum standards. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/interim-ks5-minimum-standards
  6. Innovation Centre in HITSA. Programming at Schools and Hobby Clubs. Retrieved from http://www.innovatsioonikeskus.ee/en/programming-schools-and-hobby-clubs
  7. K-12 Computer Science Framework. (2016). Retrieved from http://www.k12cs.org.
  8. Khan Academy(2015). Computer programming. Retrieved from https://www.khanacademy.org/computing/computer-programming
  9. Koodi2016(2014). Koodi2016-ensiapua ohjelmoinnin opettamiseen peruskoulussa. Retrieved from https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/koodi2016/Koodi2016_LR.pdf
  10. Ministry of Education, Korea (2015). Elementary School Curriculum. #2015-74 (Annex 2).
  11. Ministry of Education, Korea (2015). Informatics Curriculum. #2015-74 (Annex 10).
  12. Ministry of Eduction, Korea (2015). Software Education Instructional Guidance.
  13. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books, Inc.
  14. Papert, S. (1996). An exploration in the space of mathematics educations. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 1(1), 95-123. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00191473
  15. Sadler, D. (2015, September). Tech sector cheers on new PM Malcolm Turnbull. startup smart. Retrieved from http://www.startupsmart.com.au/planning/tech-sector-cheers-on-new-pm-malcolm-turnbull/2015091515517.html
  16. Shin, S., Bae, Y. (2014, December). Analysis and Implication about Elementary Computer Education in India. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education. Vol 18, No. 4. pp. 585-594. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2014.18.4.585
  17. Shin, S., Bae, Y. (2015, December). A Study on the Hierarchical Instructional System Design of Software Education by School System. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education. Vol 19, No. 4. pp. 533-544. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2015.19.4.533
  18. Shin, S., Bae, Y. (2015, March). Review of Software Education based on the Coding in Finland. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education. Vol 19, No. 1. pp. 127-138. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2015.19.1.127
  19. Shin, S., Bae, Y. (2015, September). Study on the Implications about Curriculum Design through the Analysis of Software Education Policy in Estonia. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education. Vol 19, No. 3. pp. 361-372. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2015.19.3.361
  20. Sridhar lyer, Farida Khan, Sahana Murthy(2013). CMC: A Model Computer Science Curriculum for K-12 Schools. 3rd Edition. Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai. Retrieved from http://www.cse.iitb.ac.in/internal/techreports/reports/TR-CSE-2013-52.pdf
  21. Wang, R. L. (2014). Computational thinking education(Chinese Edition). Shanghai Science and Technology Education Press.
  22. Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
  23. Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical transactions of the royal society of London A: mathematical, physical and engineering sciences, 366(1881), 3717-3725. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0118
  24. Wing, J. M. (2015). Computational Thinking 計算論的思考. 情報處理, 56(6), 584-587. Retrieved from https://ipsj.ixsq.nii.ac.jp/ej/?action=repository_action_common_download&item_id=141823&item_no=1&attribute_id=1&file_no=3

피인용 문헌

  1. 가상현실장비(VR)를 활용한 융합인재교육 프로그램 개발 및 만족도와 학습자의 태도 분석 vol.22, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2018.22.5.593
  2. 초등교육과정에서 자료구조 교육을 위한 내용 선정의 적합성 조사 분석 vol.24, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.6109/jkiice.2020.24.2.311
  3. 디지털 환경권 개념 정립과 정보교과 교육 강화에 대한 연구 vol.24, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2020.24.2.189