DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

서양 악의 상징물에 나타난 조형성 연구

A Study of Formativeness in the Western Symbolic Icons of Evil

  • 이영화 (동양미래대학교 시각정보디자인과)
  • Lee, Young hwa (Dept. of Visual Information Design, Dong Yang Mirae University)
  • 투고 : 2018.03.02
  • 심사 : 2018.04.20
  • 발행 : 2018.04.28

초록

인간은 선과 악을 함께 가지고 있기 때문에 양면적이라 할 수 있다. 이러한 인간은 악을 더욱 구체화하기 위해 악을 형상화하여 조형적 요소로 악의 상징물을 만들었다. 이에 본 연구자는 악의 개념부터 인간이 가지고 있는 악에 본질이 상징물로 표현되었을 때 나타나는 조형성에 관하여 조사 분석해 보고자 하였다. 조형성의 분류 항목을 구축하여 설문지를 작성하여 다음과 같은 분석의 결과를 도출하였다. 구성유형에서는 문자보다는 그림 또는 기호로 표현되었으며, 표현대상에서는 신화 속 인물과 동물의 형태로 나타났다. 레이아웃에서는 방사형이 가장 많이 나타났으며 묘사방법에서는 단순성과 복잡성의 형태로 외곽형태는 원형이 가장 높게 나타났다. 이러한 구성유형의 항목들이 높은 점수를 보인 상징물은 서로간의 조형적인 상관관계로 그려지고 사용되었으며, 발전해 왔다는 것을 알 수 있었다.

Men are ambivalent since they have good and evil at the same time. To concretize this evil further, men created symbolic icons of evil with formative elements by giving shape to it. Thus, this researcher would investigate and analyze the concept of evil and the formativeness appearing when the essence of humans' evil is expressed as symbolic icons. For this purpose, items for the classification of formativeness were constructed, and questionnaires were prepared to draw the results of an analysis as follows. As for the type of composition, symbolic icons of evil were expressed by pictures or signs, rather than letters. The objects of expression were characters and animals in myths. As for the layout, most were expressed in a radial shape. As for the method of description, most were in the forms of simplicity and complexity, and as for the outer form, most were circles. It was noted that the symbolic icons in which items with these types of composition had high scores, were drawn, used and developed in formative relations with each other.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Witch-Hunting, http://terms.naver.com/entry.nhn?docId=1202239&cid=40942&categoryId=31534, Naver Doosan Encyclopedia, Dec. 11, 2017.
  2. P. Ricoeur, (1967), The Symbolism of Evil. Boston : Beacon Press.
  3. Hermes, http://terms.naver.com/entry.nhn?docId=3398394&cid=58143&categoryId=58143, Naver Greek and Rome Mythological Characters Encyclopedia, Dec. 20, 2017.
  4. Hermes, https://namu.wiki/w/Hermes. Namuwiki, Dec. 29, 2017.
  5. Adam and Eve, http://100.daum.net/encyclopedia/view/b14a0668a, Daum Encyclopedia, Dec. 18, 2017.
  6. Snake, https://ko.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=%EB%B1%80&title=%ED%8A%B9%EC%88%98:%EA%B2%80%EC%83%89&profile=default&fulltext=1&searchToken=4hns1um8f9s0v4jnx2g2z6s36, Wikipedia, Aug. 30, 2017.
  7. Snake, http://terms.naver.com/entry.nhn?docId=629383&cid=50766&categoryId=50794, Naver Religious Studies Dictionary, Aug. 20, 1998.
  8. A. Frutiger. Trans. S. Y. Jeong. (2007). Men and Signs, Hong Design, pp.244-245.
  9. G. B. Russel. Tans. Y. B. Kim. (2006). Devil - History of Evil 1. Renaissance.
  10. G. de Givry. Trans. S. Lim & H. J. Kim. (2016). Witchcraft, Magic and Alchemy, Ruby Box.
  11. M. Dakahashi. Trans. S.S. Kim. (1997). Symbol Design
  12. K. Y. Lee. (2009) Angels and Devils in the World. Samyang Media.
  13. Y. D. Lee. (1999). Evil and Devil from Myths. Dongyoung.
  14. K. Simms. Trans. C. H. Kim. (2009). Paul Ricoeur, Routledge Critical Thinkers. LP.
  15. P. Ricoeur. Trans. M. S. Yang. (1999). Symbols of Evil. Moonji Publishing.
  16. E. J. Kim. (2007). Study of the Relationships of Aesthetic Influence Elements of Preferred Symbol Designs. Ewha Womans University Master's Thesis.
  17. H. R. Kim. (2016). Study of Symbols of Evil in Paul Ricoeur. Hyupsung University and Seminary. Master's Thesis.
  18. M. W. Seo. (2005). Hermeneutic Study of Evil. Honam Theological University and Seminary, Master's Thesis.
  19. S. J. Lee. (2004) Understanding men and Moral Education through Ricoeur's Interpretation of Symbols of Evil. Korea National University of Education.
  20. S. C. Lee. (2006). Study of Understanding of Evil. Hyupsung University and Seminary. Master's Thesis.
  21. Y. H. Lee. (2009). Semantic Analysis of the Symbolism of Symbols of Fortune in the East and West and Study of Formative Elements. Kyunghee University. Doctoral Dissertation.
  22. B. S. Cho & S. B. Kim. (2013). A Study on the Re-designed Bang-Wee-Shin-Sang to the Korean Tradition. Journal of Digital Convergence, 11(4), 431-441. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDPM.2013.11.12.431
  23. J. W. Park & S. C. Park. (2014). Study on Comparative Analysis of Formativeness and Modern Jewelry. Journal of Digital Convergence, 12(1), 563-572. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14400/JDPM.2014.12.1.563