융합정보논문지 (Journal of Convergence for Information Technology)

중소기업융합학회 (Convergence Society for SMB)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

벤처기업의 정보시스템 특성과 조직특성이 과정적 경영성과에 미치는 영향

A Study on the Effect of the Information System Factors and the Organizational Factors of Venture Firms on Procedural Management Performance

  • 김기중 (서울벤처대학원대학교 융합산업학과) ;
  • 이선규 (서울벤처대학원대학교 융합산업학과)
  • Kim, Gi-Jung (Department of Convergence Industry, Seoul Venture University) ;
  • Yi, Seon-Gyu (Department of Convergence Industry, Seoul Venture University)
  • 투고 : 2018.02.13
  • 심사 : 2018.04.20
  • 발행 : 2018.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 수도권의 중소 벤처기업에 근무하고 있는 관리자를 대상으로 하여 정보시스템 특성과 조직특성이 과정적 경영성과에 미치는 영향을 분석하였다. ICT 도입과 기업성과에 대한 선행연구에서는 대기업과 일반 중소기업을 대상으로 한 연구가 주류를 이루고 있는데, 본 연구에서는 중소벤처기업의 특성을 고려하여 연구를 수행하였다. 연구결과 시스템 특성의 시스템 적합성, 시스템 품질, IT 자산은 과정적 경영성과에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 분석되었고, 조직특성의 관리자 인지, 인적자원의 역량은 과정적 경영성과에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 분석되었으나 평가와 보상은 경영성과에 긍정적인 영향을 미치지 않는 것으로 분석되었다. 이러한 연구결과는 선행연구에서 제시하고 있는 연구결과와 대부분 동일한 분석결과를 보이고 있었다. 벤처기업은 자금력이나 기술, 조직관리 능력이 일반 중소기업 보다 대부분 열악하다. 그러나 새로운 정보시스템의 도입과 확산 요인은 일반 중소기업과 큰 차이가 없음을 알 수 있었다.

The purpose of this study is to analyze the influence of information system factors and organizational factors on procedural management performance in small and medium-sized venture companies in the Seoul metropolitan area. In the previous study was conducted mainly on large companies and general SMEs. In this study, the research was conducted considering the characteristics of SMEs. The results showed that system suitability, system quality, and IT assets had a positive effect on procedural management performance, and manager perception and human resource capacity had a positive effect on procedural management performance. But the evaluation and compensation did not have a positive effect on procedural management performance. The results of this study showed almost the same results as those of the previous studies. Venture firms have poor financial ability, technology, and organizational management ability than general SMEs. However, the introduction and diffusion factors of new information systems were not significantly different from those of general SMEs.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. E. M. Rogers. (2003). Diffusion of Innovation, 5th edition. USA: Free Press.
  2. T. W. Kim. (2015). Effects of technological, organizational, and environmental factors on the diffusion of SCM information systems and performance with moderating effects of corporate characteristics. Doctoral Dissertation. The Graduate School of Kyungpook National University, Daegu.
  3. L. G. Tornatzky & M. Fleischer. (1990). The Process of Technological Innovation. New York: Lexington Books.
  4. R. G. Fichman. (2000). The diffusion and assimilation of information technology innovations. Framing the domains of IT management: Projecting the future through the past, 105127.
  5. S. J. Lee. (2006). A Study on the Effects of Innovative Acceptance Factors on the Expansion of Innovation in ERP System-Using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Doctoral Dissertation. The Graduate School of Changwon University, Changwon.
  6. K. O. Park. (2012). An Empirical Study on the Introduction Performance of SCM System: Structural Equation Model Approach. Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 12(3), 295-310. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2012.12.03.295
  7. S. H. Lim. (2009). A Study on the Relationship between Technology Suitability and RFID Acceptance Intention. Jungseok Logistics Research Institute, Inha University, 9(3), 1-184.
  8. F. T. S. Chan, A. Y. L. Chong & Li. Zhou. (2012). An empirical investigation of factors affecting e-collaboration. International Production Economic, 138(2), 329-344. DOI : 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.04.004
  9. M. J. Pan & W. Y. Jang. (2008). Determinants of the adoption of enterprise resource planning within the technology-organization-environment framework: Taiwan’s communications industry. Journal of Computer Information Systems. 48(3), 94-102.
  10. P. Ruivo. T. Oliveira. & M. Neto. (2014). Examine ERP post-implementation stages of use and value: empirical evidence from Portuguese SMEs. International Journal of accounting information systems, 15(2), 166-184. DOI : 10.1016/j.accinf.2014.01.002
  11. C. Y. Lin & Y. H. Ho. (2009). RFID technology adoption and supply chain performance: an empirical study in China's logistics industry. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(5), 369-378. DOI : 10.1108/13598540910980288
  12. A. Y. Chong. and L. Zhou. (2014). Demand chain management: relationships between external antecedents, web-based integration and service innovation performance. International Journal of Productions Economics, 154, 48-58. DOI : 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.04.005
  13. Y. K. Dwived. M. R. Wade & S. L. Schneberge. (2012). Information Systems Theory: Explaining and Predicting Our Digital Society. Integrated Series in Information Systems, 28, 231-245.
  14. P. Bing, M. K. Sharma & J. K. Golda. (1999). Critical Issue Affection an ERP Implementation. Information Systems Management, 16(3), 7-14. https://doi.org/10.1201/1078/43197.16.3.19990601/31310.2
  15. B. M. Staw (1990). An evolutionary approach to creativity and innovation. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 287-308.
  16. C. Ranganathan & S. Jasbir. Dhaliwal. (2004). Assimilation and Diffusion of Web Technologies in Supply chain. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 9, 127-161.
  17. D. Elmuti. (2002). The Perceived Impact of Supply Chain Management on Organizational Effectiveness. Journal of Supply Chain management, 38(3), 49-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2002.tb00135.x
  18. S. W. Soo. (2004). An Empirical Study on Structural Relationship Model of Supply Chain Partnership. Doctoral Dissertation. The Graduate School of Chonnam National University, Kwangju.
  19. R. Mcdermott & C. O'Dell. (2001). Overcoming cultural barriors to sharing knowledge. Journal Of Knowledge Management, 5, 77-85. DOI : 10.1108/13673270110384428
  20. K. C. Jeong, J. K. Lee & Y. S. Jang. (2003). Analysis of Success Factors of Knowledge Management System: Examples of Construction Industry in Korea. Korea Institute of Management Information Spring Conference, 897-906.
  21. M. Bradford, & J. Florin, (2003). Examining the role of innovation diffusion factors on the implementation success of enterprise resource planning systems. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 4(3), 205-225. DOI : 10.1016/s1467-0895(03)00026-5
  22. C. H. Lee. (2003). An Empirical Study on Factors Affecting the Performance of ERP System Implementation-Focused on manufacturing companies adopting production management module. Doctoral Dissertation. The Graduate School of Seoul National University, Seoul.
  23. S. H. Ju. (2001). A Study on the Influence of the Introduction of ERP System on Business Performance-From an integrated viewpoint of introduction factors. Doctoral Dissertation. The Graduate School of Dongguk University, Seoul.
  24. S. Shang & P. B. Seddon, (2002). Assessing and managing the benefits of enterprise systems: The business manager's perspective. Information Systems Journal, 12(4), 271-29. DOI : 10.1046/j.1365-2575.2002.00132.x
  25. W. H. DeLone & E. R. McLean, (1992). Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variables. Information System Research, 3(1), 60-95. DOI : 10.2753/mis0742-1222290401
  26. N. Agami, M. Saleh & M. Rasmy. (2012). A hybrid dynamic framework for supply chain performance improvement. IEEE Systems Journal, 6(4), 469-478. DOI : 10.1109/jsyst.2011.2177109
  27. L. C. Cheng & M. Grimm. Curtis. (2008). The Application of Empirical Strategic management Research to Supply Chain Management. Journal of Business Logistics, 27, 1-57.
  28. K. K. Hong & Y. G. Kim. (2002). The critical success factors for ERP implementation: an organizational fit perspective. Information & Management, 40(1), 25-40. DOI : 10.1016/s0378-7206(01)00134-3
  29. M. Bradford & J. Florin. (2003). Examining the role of innovation diffusion factors on the implementation success of enterprise resource planning systems. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 4(3), 205-225. DOI : 10.1016/s1467-0895(03)00026-5
  30. S. O. Han. (2006). A Study on the Effects of Cognitive Behavior on ERP System Performance. Doctoral Dissertation. The Graduate School of Honam University, Daejeon.
  31. K. W. Lee. (2013). An Empirical Study on the Preceding Factors of Green SCM and Corporate Performance. Doctoral Dissertation. The Graduate School of Yeungnam University, Daegu.
  32. M. E. Jennex & L. Olfman, (2002). Organizational Memory/Knowledge Effects on Productivity, a Longitudinal Study. Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. USA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
  33. P. Weill & M. Vitale, (2002). What IT infrastructure capabilities are needed to implement e-bisiness models? MIS Quarterly executive, 1(1), 17-24.
  34. C. K. Park. (2013). A Study on the Resistance and Change Management Factors Affecting ERP System Performance. Doctoral Dissertation. The Graduate School of Yeungnam University, Daegu.
  35. S. M. Lee. (2013). Influence of introduction factors of ERP system on introduction decision and management performance. Doctoral Dissertation. The Graduate School of Dongmyung University, Pusan
  36. S. C. Lee. (2004). Since the introduction of ERP system, change management for ERP effect: From the perspective of information capability. Doctoral Dissertation. The Graduate School of Yonsei University, Seoul.
  37. H. J. Lee. (2004). An Empirical Study on the Relationship between Knowledge Management and Government Performance. Doctoral Dissertation. The Graduate School of Kyunghee University, Seoul.
  38. B. Y. Lee. (2008). A Study on the Influencing Factors on Local Government Knowledge Management Activities. Doctoral Dissertation. The Graduate School of Catholic University, Bucheon.