DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Hard- and soft-tissue profiles of the midface region in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion using cone-beam computed tomography multiplanar-reconstructed image analysis

  • Kim, Bomi (Department of Orthodontics, Pusan National University Dental Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Hyung-Chul (Department of Orthodontics, Pusan National University Dental Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Seong-Hun (Department of Orthodontics, Pusan National University Dental Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Yongil (Department of Orthodontics, Pusan National University Dental Hospital) ;
  • Son, Woosung (Department of Orthodontics, Pusan National University Dental Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Seong Sik (Department of Orthodontics, Pusan National University Dental Hospital)
  • 투고 : 2017.05.02
  • 심사 : 2017.11.04
  • 발행 : 2018.05.25

초록

Objective: This study examined cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-derived multiplanar-reconstructed (MPR) cross-sections to clarify the salient characteristics of patients with skeletal class III malocclusion with midface deficiency (MD). Methods: The horizontal and sagittal plane intersection points were identified for middle-third facial analysis in 40 patients in the MD or normal (N) groups. MPR images acquired parallel to each horizontal plane were used for length and angular measurements. Results: A comparison of the MD and N groups revealed significant differences in the zygoma prominence among female patients. The convex zygomatic area in the N group was larger than that in the MD group, and the inferior part of the midface in the N group was smaller than that in the MD group for both male and female patients. A significant difference was observed in the concave middle maxillary area among male patients. Conclusions: This study was conducted to demonstrate the difference between MD and normal face through MPR images derived from CBCT. Male patients in the MD group had a more flattened face than did those in the N group. Female patients in the MD group showed a concave-shaped lower section of the zygoma, which tended to have more severe MD. These findings indicate that orthognathic surgery to improve skeletal discrepancy requires different approaches in male and female patients.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Sabri R. Orthodontic objectives in orthognathic surgery: state of the art today. World J Orthod 2006;7:177-91.
  2. Park HC, Lee JW. Study of horizontal skeletal pattern and dental arch in skeletal Class III malocclusion patients. Korean J Orthod 2008;38:358-70. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2008.38.5.358
  3. Bergman RT. Cephalometric soft tissue facial analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;116:373-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70222-2
  4. McNeill RW, Proffit WR, White RP. Cephalometric prediction for orthodontic surgery. Angle Orthod 1972;42:154-64.
  5. Burstone CJ, James RB, Legan H, Murphy GA, Norton LA. Cephalometrics for orthognathic surgery. J Oral Surg 1978;36:269-77.
  6. Choe YK, Suhr CH. Hard and soft tissue changes after orthognathic surgery of mandibular prognathism. Korean J Orthod 1993;23:707-24.
  7. Louis PJ, Austin RB, Waite PD, Mathews CS. Soft tissue changes of the upper lip associated with maxillary advancement in obstructive sleep apnea patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001;59:151-6. https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2001.20485
  8. Stella JP, Streater MR, Epker BN, Sinn DP. Predictability of upper lip soft tissue changes with maxillary advancement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1989;47:697-703. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(89)80008-4
  9. Betts NJ, Vig KW, Vig P, Spalding P, Fonseca RJ. Changes in the nasal and labial soft tissues after surgical repositioning of the maxilla. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1993;8:7-23.
  10. Zide B, Grayson B, McCarthy JG. Cephalometric analysis for upper and lower midface surgery: Part II. Plast Reconstr Surg 1981;68:961-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198112000-00026
  11. Jung JH, Kim SS, Son WS, Park SB. Soft tissue change of the midface in skeletal class III orthognathic surgery patients. Korean J Orthod 2008;38:83-94. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2008.38.2.83
  12. Singh GD, McNamara JA Jr, Lozanoff S. Morphometry of the midfacial complex in subjects with class III malocclusions: Procrustes, Euclidean, and cephalometric analyses. Clin Anat 1998;11:162-70. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2353(1998)11:3<162::AID-CA3>3.0.CO;2-V
  13. Nocini PF, Boccieri A, Bertossi D. Gridplan midfacial analysis for alloplastic implants at the time of jaw surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;123:670-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e318196b958
  14. Lopes PM, Moreira CR, Perrella A, Antunes JL, Cavalcanti MG. 3-D volume rendering maxillofacial analysis of angular measurements by multislice CT. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;105:224-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.08.036
  15. Jung YJ, Kim MJ, Baek SH. Hard and soft tissue changes after correction of mandibular prognathism and facial asymmetry by mandibular setback surgery: three-dimensional analysis using computerized tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;107:763-71.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.12.026
  16. Kim NK, Lee C, Kang SH, Park JW, Kim MJ, Chang YI. A three-dimensional analysis of soft and hard tissue changes after a mandibular setback surgery. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2006;83:178-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2006.06.009
  17. Choi YK, Park SB, Kim YI, Son WS. Three-dimensional evaluation of midfacial asymmetry in patients with nonsyndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate by cone-beam computed tomography. Korean J Orthod 2013;43:113-9. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2013.43.3.113
  18. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-74. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
  19. Chien PC, Parks ET, Eraso F, Hartsfield JK, Roberts WE, Ofner S. Comparison of reliability in anatomical landmark identification using two-dimensional digital cephalometrics and three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography in vivo. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009;38:262-73. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/81889955
  20. Hwang HS, Hwang CH, Lee KH, Kang BC. Maxillofacial 3-dimensional image analysis for the diagnosis of facial asymmetry. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:779-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.02.021
  21. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Serrao G, Ciusa V, Dellavia C. Growth and aging of facial soft tissues: A computerized three-dimensional mesh diagram analysis. Clin Anat 2003;16:420-33. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.10154
  22. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Schmitz JH, Santoro F. Threedimensional facial morphometric assessment of soft tissue changes after orthognathic surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999;88:549-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(99)70084-3
  23. Soncul M, Bamber MA. Evaluation of facial soft tissue changes with optical surface scan after surgical correction of Class III deformities. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62:1331-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2004.04.019
  24. Chew MT. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Chinese Class III patients. Angle Orthod 2005;75:959-63.
  25. Harada K, Kikuchi T, Morishima S, Sato M, Ohkura K, Omura K. Changes in bite force and dentoskeletal morphology in prognathic patients after orthognathic surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;95:649-54. https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2003.239
  26. Cho JH, Kim EJ, Kim BC, Cho KH, Lee KH, Hwang HS. Correlations of frontal lip-line canting with craniofacial morphology and muscular activity. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:278.e7-14.
  27. Kwon TG, Park HS, Ryoo HM, Lee SH. A comparison of craniofacial morphology in patients with and without facial asymmetry--a three-dimensional analysis with computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;35:43-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2005.04.006
  28. Morris DE, Moaveni Z, Lo LJ. Aesthetic facial skeletal contouring in the Asian patient. Clin Plast Surg 2007;34:547-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2007.05.005

피인용 문헌

  1. Differentiation between maxillary and malar midface position within the facial profile vol.7, pp.None, 2019, https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8200
  2. Effect of Le Fort I Maxillary Advancement and Clockwise Rotation on the Anteromedial Cheek Soft Tissue Change in Patients with Skeletal Class III Pattern and Midface Deficiency: A 3D Imaging-Based Pre vol.9, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9010262