The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of longevity and success rate of fixed, removable, and implant prostheses treated in Korea

국내에서 치료된 고정성, 가철성, 그리고 임플란트 보철물의 수명 및 성공률 분석

  • Yoon, Joon-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, NHIS Ilsan Hospital) ;
  • Park, Young-Bum (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Oh, Nam-Sik (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Medicine, Inha University)
  • 윤준호 (국민건강보험 일산병원 치과보철과) ;
  • 박영범 (연세대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 오남식 (인하대학교 의학전문대학원 치과보철과)
  • Received : 2017.09.10
  • Accepted : 2018.02.08
  • Published : 2018.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to analyze the factors affecting the longevity of failed prosthesis and the success rate of the prosthesis based on the data evaluated with the newly developed Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (KAP) criteria. Materials and methods: Evaluation was performed in the restored prosthesis for patients who visited the prosthodontics department of the 13 dental university hospitals and general hospitals. The status of the prosthesis was classified into four categories: Good, Fair, Bad, Worst. The success was recorded if only the category was classified in 'good'. The mean duration of failed prostheses and the success rate through Kaplan-Meier method were analyzed. Results: A total of 1,804 cases of prosthesis were evaluated: 810 cases of fixed dental prostheses (FDP), 519 cases of Removable Dental Prostheses (RDP), and 475 cases of implant prosthesis. The mean duration of failed FDP was $11.41{\pm}0.30years$ and the median was 10 years. The mean duration of failed RDP was $8.18{\pm}0.29years$ and the median was 7 years. The mean duration of failed implant prosthesis was $7.99{\pm}0.30years$ and the median was 7 years. The factors related to the failure were as follows: number of units, abutments, abutments treated with root canal, and plaque index in FDPs; treated and opposing dentition in RDPs; the number of implants, duration of use, and plaque index in implant prostheses. Conclusion: The average duration of failed prosthesis was 11.41 years for FDPs, 8.18 years for RDPs, and 7.99 years for implant prosthesis, according to the evaluation with newly developed KAP criteria.

목적: 이 연구의 목적은 새롭게 개발된 대한치과보철학회의 보철물 평가 기준을 적용하여 고정성, 가철성 그리고 임플란트 보철물의 성공과 실패를 평가함으로써 보철물의 수명과 이에 관련된 요인을 분석하는 데 있다. 대상 및 방법: 전국 13개 대학/종합병원 보철과에 내원한 환자들을 대상으로 구강내 사용중인 보철물을 평가하였다. 대한치과보철학회의 기준에 따라, 수는 성공, 우, 양, 가는 실패로 규정하고, 실패한 보철물의 평균 사용기간과 실패와 관련된 요인을 분석하였다. Kaplan-Meier 분석에 의한 성공률을 분석하였다. 결과: 고정성 보철 810 증례, 가철성 보철 519 증례, 그리고 임플란트 보철 475 증례, 총 1,804 증례가 연구에 포함되었다. 검사 시점에 실패로 판정된 보철물의 평균 사용기간은 고정성 보철물은 $11.41{\pm}0.30$년, 중간값은 10년이었고, 가철성 보철물은 $8.18{\pm}0.29$년, 중간값 7년이었으며, 임플란트 보철물은 $7.99{\pm}0.30$년, 중간값은 7년이었다. 실패와 관련있는 요인 중 고정성보철물은 유닛 수, 지대치 수, 근관치료된 지대치 수, 치태지수였고, 가철성 보철물의 경우 대합치였으며 임플란트 보철의 경우 임플란트 개수, 사용기간, 치태지수였다. 결론: 대한치과보철학회의 기준으로 보철물을 평가한 결과, 실패한 보철물의 평균수명은 고정성 11.41년, 가철성 8.18년, 그리고 임플란트 보철물은 7.99년이었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kwon BK, Ahn HJ, Kang JK, Kim JY, Choi JH. The jurisdictional precedent analysis of medical dispute in dental field. J Oral Med Pain 2006;31:283-96.
  2. Korea Consumer Agency. Implant treatment is the most common dental disputes. 2013 - [cited September 2, 2017]. Available from: http://www.kca.go.kr/brd/m_4/view.do?seq=408&multi_itm_seq=0.
  3. Cha YR, Kwon JS, Choi JH, Kim JY. The analysis of the current status of medical accidents and disputes researched in the Korean web sites. J Oral Med Pain 2006;31:297-316.
  4. Park SG, Shin HS, Kim SM. Dental accidents and malpractice disputes survey. J Korean Dent Assoc 2015;53:103-10.
  5. Schwartz NL, Whitsett LD, Berry TG, Stewart JL. Unserviceable crowns and fixed partial dentures: Life-span and causes for loss of serviceability. J Am Dent Assoc 1970;81:1395-401. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1970.0398
  6. Foster LV. Failed conventional bridge work from general dental practice: clinical aspects and treatment needs of 142 cases, Br Dent J 1990;168:199-201. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4807133
  7. Valderhaug J. A 15-year clinical evaluation of fixed prosthodontics. Acta Odontol Scand 1991;49:35-40. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016359109041138
  8. Yang JH. Report on the longevity of prostheses. Seoul, Korea: Korean Academy of Prosthodontics, 2001.
  9. Shin WJ, Jeon YS, Lee KW, Lee HY, Han DH. Longevity and failure analysis of fixed restorations serviced in Korea. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2005;43:158-73.
  10. Yun MJ, Jeon YC, Jeong CM. Evaluation of clinical status of fixed prosthesis. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2009;47:99-107. https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2009.47.2.99
  11. Yoon J, Park Y, Youn S, Oh N. Korea academy of prosthodontics criteria for longevity studies of dental prostheses. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2016;54:341-53. https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2016.54.4.341
  12. Walton JN, Gardner FM, Agar JR. A survey of crown and fixed partial denture failures: Length of service and reasons for replacement. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56:416-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90379-3
  13. Libby G, Arcuri MR, LaVelle WE, Hebl L. Longevity of fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:127-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70115-X
  14. Vermeulen AHBM, Keltjens HMAM, van't Hof MA, Kayser AF. Ten-year evaluation of removable partial dentures: Survival rates based on retreatment, not wearing and replacement. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:267-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90170-5
  15. Sundh B, Odman P. A study of fixed prosthodontics performed at a university clinic 18 years after insertion. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:513-9.
  16. Lindquist E, Karlsson S. Success rate and failures for fixed partial dentures after 20 years of service: Part I. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:133-8.
  17. Holm C, Tidehag P, Tillberg A, Molin M. Longevity and quality of FPDs: a retrospective study of restorations 30, 20, and 10 years after insertion. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:283-9.
  18. Creugers NH, Kayser AF, van't Hof MA. A meta-analysis of durability data on conventional fixed bridges. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1994;22:448-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1994.tb00795.x
  19. Scurria MS, Bader JD, Shugars DA. Meta-analysis of fixed partial denture survival: prostheses and abutments. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:459-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70162-3
  20. Pjetursson BE, Sailer I, Makarov NA, Zwahlen M, Thoma DS. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part II: Multiple-unit FDPs. Dent Mater 2015;31:624-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.02.013
  21. Pjetursson BE, Tan K, Lang NP, Bragger U, Egger M, Zwahlen M. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:625-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01117.x
  22. Moldovan O, Rudolph H, Luthardt RG. Clinical performance of removable dental prostheses in the moderately reduced dentition: a systematic literature review. Clin Oral Investig 2016;20:1435-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1873-5
  23. Pjetursson BE, Thoma D, Jung R, Zwahlen M, Zembic A. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) after a mean observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:22-38.
  24. Sax C, Hammerle CH, Sailer I. 10-year clinical outcomes of fixed dental prostheses with zirconia frameworks. Int J Comput Dent 2011;14:183-202.
  25. Schwartz NL, Whitsett LD, Berry TG, Stewart JL. Unserviceable crowns and fixed partial dentures: life-span and causes for loss of serviceability. J Am Dent Assoc 1970;81:1395-401. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1970.0398
  26. Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JY. Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:121-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00212-9
  27. Schmitter M, Mussotter K, Rammelsberg P, Gabbert O, Ohlmann B. Clinical performance of long-span zirconia frameworks for fixed dental prostheses: 5-year results. J Oral Rehabil 2012;39:552-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2012.02311.x
  28. Sailer I, Feher A, Filser F, Gauckler LJ, Luthy H, Hammerle CH. Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont 2007;20:383-8.

Cited by

  1. 치과 보철 재료 표면에서 MnO2-diatom microbubbler의 세균막 제거 효과 연구: In vitro study vol.58, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2020.58.1.14
  2. 임플란트 보철의 기능별 환자 만족도 연구 vol.42, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14347/jtd.2020.42.3.262