DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative digestibility of nutrients and amino acids in high-fiber diets fed to crossbred barrows of Duroc boars crossed with Berkshire×Jiaxing and Landrace×Yorkshire

  • Zhao, Jinbiao (State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Wang, Qiuyun (State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Liu, Ling (State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Chen, Yiqiang (State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Jin, Aiming (Zhejiang Qinglian Food Company) ;
  • Liu, Guoliang (Zhejiang Qinglian Food Company) ;
  • Li, Kaizhen (Zhejiang Qinglian Food Company) ;
  • Li, Defa (State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Lai, Changhua (State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, China Agricultural University)
  • Received : 2017.05.06
  • Accepted : 2017.08.30
  • Published : 2018.05.01

Abstract

Objective: This experiment was conducted to determine the differences in the apparent ileal (AID) and total tract digestibility (ATTD) of nutrients and indispensable amino acids (IAA) in high-fiber diets with wheat middlings, rice bran or alfalfa meal fed to Duroc${\times}$(Landrace${\times}$Yorkshire) (DLY) and Duroc${\times}$ (Berkshire${\times}$Jiaxing) (DBJ) growing barrows. Methods: Eighteen DLY and 18 DBJ growing barrows were randomly allotted to a $2{\times}3$ factorial arrangement involving 2 crossbreeds and 3 high-fiber diets. The experiment lasted 15 d with 10 d for diets adaptation, 3 d for feces collection and 2 d for digesta collection. Three diets were based on corn and soybean meal with 25% wheat middlings, rice bran and alfalfa meal respectively. Results: DBJ had a greater (p<0.05) AID of isoleucine, leucine, lysine, phenylalanine and valine and a lower (p<0.05) AID of methionine than DLY. The hindgut disappearance of acid detergent fiber for DBJ was greater (p<0.05) than DLY. The ATTD of gross energy, dry matter, organic matter, neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber in wheat middlings diet were greater (p<0.05) than in rice bran and alfalfa meal diets. The hindgut disappearance of neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber in wheat middlings diet or rice bran diet were the highest or lowest (p<0.05), and those of alfalfa meal diet were the middle. Barrows fed rice bran diet had a greater (p<0.05) hindgut disappearance of gross energy, dry matter and organic matter and lower hindgut disappearance of neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber than barrows fed alfalfa meal diet Conclusion: DBJ growing barrows showed a significant higher digestibility of fiber in the hindgut and most IAA in the small intestine compared with DLY barrows. The digestibilities of chemical constituents and IAA were affected by the diets formulated with different fiber sources.

Keywords

References

  1. Wachenheim CJ, Novak P, De Vuyst EA, Lambert DK. Demand estimation for agricultural processing coproducts. Great Plains Res 2006;16:85-94.
  2. Hoffman LA, Baker A. Estimating the substitution of distillers' grains for corn and soybean meal in the US feed complex. A Report from the Economic Research Service, US Department of Agriculture; 2011.
  3. Sola-Oriol D, Roura E, Torrallardona D. Feed preference in pigs: Effect of cereal sources at different inclusion rates. J Anim Sci 2009;87:562-70. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2008-0949
  4. Le Goff G, Van Milgen J, Noblet J. Influence of dietary fiber on digestive utilization and rate of passage in growing pigs, finishing pigs and adult sows. Anim Sci 2002;74:503-15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1357729800052668
  5. Fevrier C, Bourdon D, Aumaitre A. Effects of level of dietary fibre from wheat bran on digestibility of nutrients, digestive enzymes and performance in the European Large White and Chinese Meishan pigs. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 1992;68: 60-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.1992.tb00618.x
  6. Len NT, Lindberg JE, Ogle B. Digestibility and nitrogen retention of diets containing different levels of fibre in local (Mong Cai). F1 (Mong Cai$\times$Yorkshire) and exotic (Landrace$\times$Yorkshire) growing pigs in Vietnam. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 2007;91:297-303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.2006.00653.x
  7. Kemp B, Hartog LA, den Klok JJ, Zandstra T. The digestibility of nutrients, energy and nitrogen in the Meishan and Dutch Landrace pig. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 1991;65:363-6.
  8. Khieu B, Lindberg JE, Ogle RB. Effect of variety and preservation method of cassava leaves on diet digestibility by indigenous and improved pigs. J Anim Sci 2005;80:319-24.
  9. da Silva CS, van den Borne JJ, Gerrits WG, Kemp B, Bolhuis JE. Effects of dietary fibers with different physicochemical properties on feeding motivation in adult female pigs. J Anim Sci 2012;107:218-30.
  10. Liu Q, Zhang WM, Zhang YJ, et al. Effect of fiber source and enzyme addition on the apparent digestibility of nutrients and physicochemical properties of digesta in cannulated growing pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2106;216:262-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.04.002
  11. Urriola PE, Stein HH. Comparative digestibility of energy and nutrients in fibrous feed ingredients fed to Meishan and Yorkshire pigs. J Anim Sci 2012;90:802-12. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010-3254
  12. Wang Z, Chen Q, Yang Y, et al. Genetic diversity and populaton structure of six Chinese indigenous pig breeds in the Taihu Lake region revealed by sequencing data. Anim Genet 2015;46:697-701. https://doi.org/10.1111/age.12349
  13. NRC. Nutrient requirements of swine. 11th rev. ed. Washington, DC, USA: National Academy Press; 2012.
  14. Cervantes-Pahm SK, Stein HH. Effects of soybean oil and soybean protein concentration on the concentration of digestible amino acid in soybean products fed to growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2008;86:1841-9. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0721
  15. AOAC International. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. 18th ed. Rev. 2. W Horowitz and GW Latimer, ed. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: AOAC International; 2007.
  16. van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 1991;74:3583-97. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
  17. Stein HH, Seve B, Fuller MF, Moughan PJ, de Lange CFM. Invited review: Amino acid bioavailability and digestibility in pig feed ingredients: terminology and application. J Anim Sci 2007;85:172-80. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2005-742
  18. Maneewan C, Mekbungwan A, Charerntantanakul W, Yamauchi K, Yamauchi KE. Effects of dietary Centella asiatica (L.) Urban on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood composition in piglets vaccinated with mycoplasma hyopneumoniae. Anim Sci J 2014;85:569-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12189
  19. Schulze H, van Leeuwen P, Verstegen MWA. Effect of level of dietary neutral detergent fiber on ileal apparent digestibility and ileal nitrogen losses in pigs. J Anim Sci 1994;72:2362-8. https://doi.org/10.2527/1994.7292362x
  20. Chen L, Gao LX, Liu L, Ding ZM, Zhang HF. Effects of graded levels of fiber from alfalfa meal on apparent and standardized ileal digestibility of amino acids in growing pigs. J Integr Agric 2015;14:2598-604. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60924-2
  21. Pahm AA, Pedersen C, Stein HH. Standardized ileal digestibility of reactive lysine in distillers dried grains with soluble fed to growing pigs. J Agric Food Chem 2009;57:535-9. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf802047d
  22. von Heimendahl E, Breves G, Abel HJ. Fiber related digestive processes in three different breeds of pigs. J Anim Sci 2010;88: 972-81. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-2370
  23. Rainbird AL, Low AG. Effect of various types of dietary fiber on gastric emptying in growing pigs. Br J Nutr 1986;55:111-21. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19860015
  24. Lindberg JE, Cortova Z. The effect of increasing inclusion of lucerne leaf meal in a barley-based diet on the partition of digestion and on nutrient utilization in pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol 1995;56:11-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(95)00823-6
  25. Chen L, Zhang HF, Gao LX, et al. Effect of graded levels of fiber from alfalfa meal on intestinal nutrient flow and hindgut fermentation of growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2013;91:4757-64. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-6307
  26. Molist F, Gomez de Segura A, Gasa J, et al. Effects of the insoluble and soluble dietary fiber on the physicochemical properties of digesta and the microbial activity in early weaned piglets. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2009;149:3096-106.
  27. Gao LX, Chen L, Huang QH, et al. Effect of dietary fiber type on intestinal nutrient digestibility and hindgut fermentation of diets fed to finishing pigs. Livest Sci 2015;174:53-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2015.01.002
  28. Ndindana W, Dzama K, Ndiweni PNB, Maswaure SM, Chimonyo M. Digestibility of high-fiber diets and performance of growing Zimbabwean indigenous Mukota pigs and exotic Large White pigs fed maize based diets with graded levels of maize cobs. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2002;97:199-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(01)00345-5
  29. Bindelle J, Leterme P, Buldgen A. Nutritional and environmental consequences of dietary fiber in pig nutrition: a review. Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ 2008;12:69-80.
  30. Yen JT, Varel VH, Nienaber JA. Metabolic and microbial responses in western crossbred and Meishan growing pigs fed a high-fiber diet. J Anim Sci 2004;82:1740-55. https://doi.org/10.2527/2004.8261740x

Cited by

  1. Effect of dietary fiber content on nutrient digestibility and fecal microbiota composition in growing-finishing pigs vol.13, pp.10, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206159
  2. Effects of fibre-degrading enzymes in combination with different fibre sources on ileal and total tract nutrient digestibility and fermentation products in pigs vol.74, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/1745039x.2020.1766333
  3. Dietary fiber - A double-edged sword for balanced nutrition supply and environment sustainability in swine industry: A meta-analysis and systematic review vol.315, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128130