Pediatric Infection and Vaccine

  • 제25권1호
  • /
  • Pages.17-25
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2384-1079(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-1087(eISSN)
대한소아감염학회 (The Korean Society of Pediatric Infectious Diseases)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

소아 대상 혈액배양검사 현황 파악을 위한 국내 다기관 설문조사

A Multicenter Survey on the Current Status of Pediatric Blood Cultures in Korea

  • 이영준 (고신대학교 의과대학 소아과학교실) ;
  • 이지영 (고신대학교 의과대학 소아과학교실) ;
  • 공섬김 (고신대학교 의과대학 소아과학교실) ;
  • 연규민 (고신대학교 의과대학 소아과학교실) ;
  • 홍유라 (고신대학교 의과대학 소아과학교실) ;
  • 오지은 (고신대학교 의과대학 소아과학교실)
  • Lee, Young Joon (Department of Pediatrics, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Kosin University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Ji Young (Department of Pediatrics, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Kosin University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kong, Seom Kim (Department of Pediatrics, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Kosin University College of Medicine) ;
  • Yeon, Gyu Min (Department of Pediatrics, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Kosin University College of Medicine) ;
  • Hong, Yoo Rha (Department of Pediatrics, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Kosin University College of Medicine) ;
  • Oh, Chi Eun (Department of Pediatrics, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Kosin University College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2017.08.26
  • 심사 : 2017.10.28
  • 발행 : 2018.04.25
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

목적: 국내에서 소아를 대상으로 시행하는 혈액배양의 적응증과 방법, 정도 관리 현황을 파악하고자 하였다. 방법: 종합병원에 근무하는 소아감염분과 전문의(소아감염)와 신생아집중치료센터를 운영하는 병원에 근무하는 신생아분과 전문의(신생아)를 대상으로 온라인 설문조사를 하였다. 결과: 소아감염의 81.1% (30/37)와 신생아의 72.2% (52/72)가 설문에 응하였다. 적응증과 무관하게 정규 검사로 혈액배양을 실시하는 경우는 소아감염의 33.3%, 신생아의 59.6%였다. 소아감염의 40%와 신생아의 65.4%가 균혈증 의심 환자에서 혈액배양을 1회 시행한다고 했다. 가장 많이 사용되는 피부 소독제는 포비돈-아이오딘이었고, 여러 피부 소독제를 사용하는 경우 그 순서는 기관마다 다양하였다. 배양 양성률 및 오염률을 모니터링하는 기관은 전체의 2/3 정도였으나 결과를 채혈자에게 피드백하는 곳은 적었다. 채혈 담당자에게 정기적인 교육을 하는 곳은 전체의 1/2 이하였다. 결론: 기관별로 혈액배양의 적응증과 방법이 다양하였으며 정도 관리를 적극적으로 시행하는 병원은 적었다. 소아에서 실시되는 혈액배양의 질 향상을 위해 표준 지침의 정립이 필요하며 정도 관리를 위한 기관들의 노력이 요구된다.

Purpose: Blood culture is an essential diagnostic tool and requires clear indications, proper techniques, and quality control. We aimed to investigate whether blood cultures in children are appropriate for indications, are performed correctly, and receive proper quality control. Methods: We conducted an online survey targeting pediatric infectious diseases (ID) specialists working in general hospitals and neonatologists (Neo) working at hospitals operating a neonatal intensive care unit in Korea. Results: Approximately 81.1% (30/37) of pediatric ID specialists and 72.2% (52/72) of Neo responded to the survey. Some of the respondents (33.3% of ID and 59.6% of Neo) performed blood culture as a regular test irrespective of the indication. Approximately 40% of ID and 65.4% of Neo ordered only one set of blood culture in patients suspected with bacteremia. The most commonly used disinfectant for skin preparation was povidone-iodine, while the skin preparation method varied by institution. Approximately two-thirds of the institutions were monitoring the blood culture contamination rate, whereas relatively few provided staff with feedback on that rate. In addition, less than half of the institutions were providing regular staff training on blood culture (40% of ID and 28.8% of Neo). Conclusions: The indication and methods of blood culture for children varied according to institution, and few hospitals exert effort in improving the quality of blood culture. Institutions have to strive constantly toward improvement of blood culture quality and evidence-based recommendations for pediatric blood cultures should be standardized.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Alahmadi YM, Aldeyab MA, McElnay JC, Scott MG, Darwish Elhajji FW, Magee FA, et al. Clinical and economic impact of contaminated blood cultures within the hospital setting. J Hosp Infect 2011;77:233-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2010.09.033
  2. Segal GS, Chamberlain JM. Resource utilization and contaminated blood cultures in children at risk for occult bacteremia. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2000;154:469-73. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.154.5.469
  3. Gander RM, Byrd L, DeCrescenzo M, Hirany S, Bowen M, Baughman J. Impact of blood cultures drawn by phlebotomy on contamination rates and health care costs in a hospital emergency department. J Clin Microbiol 2009; 47:1021-4. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02162-08
  4. Wilson ML; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. M47A Principles and procedures for blood cultures: approved guideline. 1st ed. Wayne: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2007.
  5. Shin JH, Song SA, Kim M, Kim S. Nationwide survey of blood culture performance regarding skin disinfection, blood collection and laboratory procedures. Korean J Clin Microbiol 2011;14:91-6. https://doi.org/10.5145/KJCM.2011.14.3.91
  6. Snyder SR, Favoretto AM, Baetz RA, Derzon JH, Madison BM, Mass D, et al. Effectiveness of practices to reduce blood culture contamination: a Laboratory Medicine Best Practices systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Biochem 2012;45:999-1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2012.06.007
  7. Weinbaum FI, Lavie S, Danek M, Sixsmith D, Heinrich GF, Mills SS. Doing it right the first time: quality improvement and the contaminant blood culture. J Clin Microbiol 1997;35:563-5.
  8. Kim NH, Kim M, Lee S, Yun NR, Kim KH, Park SW, et al. Effect of routine sterile gloving on contamination rates in blood culture: a cluster randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2011;154:145-51. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-154-3-201102010-00003
  9. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. GP41-A6 Procedures for the collection of diagnostic blood specimens by venipuncture; approved standard. 6th ed. Wayne: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2007.
  10. Trautner BW, Clarridge JE, Darouiche RO. Skin antisepsis kits containing alcohol and chlorhexidine gluconate or tincture of iodine are associated with low rates of blood culture contamination. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002;23:397-401. https://doi.org/10.1086/502073
  11. Isaacman DJ, Karasic RB, Reynolds EA, Kost SI. Effect of number of blood cultures and volume of blood on detection of bacteremia in children. J Pediatr 1996;128:190-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476(96)70388-8
  12. Baron EJ, Miller JM, Weinstein MP, Richter SS, Gilligan PH, Thomson RB Jr, et al. A guide to utilization of the microbiology laboratory for diagnosis of infectious diseases: 2013 recommendations by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the American Society for Microbiology (ASM)(a). Clin Infect Dis 2013;57:e22-121. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cit278
  13. Schelonka RL, Chai MK, Yoder BA, Hensley D, Brockett RM, Ascher DP. Volume of blood required to detect common neonatal pathogens. J Pediatr 1996;129:275-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476(96)70254-8
  14. Buttery JP. Blood cultures in newborns and children: optimising an everyday test. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2002;87:F25-8. https://doi.org/10.1136/fn.87.1.F25
  15. Connell TG, Rele M, Cowley D, Buttery JP, Curtis N. How reliable is a negative blood culture result? Volume of blood submitted for culture in routine practice in a children's hospital. Pediatrics 2007;119:891-6. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-0440
  16. Simonsen KA, Anderson-Berry AL, Delair SF, Davies HD. Early-onset neonatal sepsis. Clin Microbiol Rev 2014;27:21-47. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00031-13
  17. Hall KK, Lyman JA. Updated review of blood culture contamination. Clin Microbiol Rev 2006;19:788-802. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00062-05
  18. Park WB, Myung SJ, Oh MD, Lee J, Kim NJ, Kim EC, et al. Educational intervention as an effective step for reducing blood culture contamination: a prospective cohort study. J Hosp Infect 2015;91:111-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2015.04.022