DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Three-dimensional optimization and sensitivity analysis of dental implant thread parameters using finite element analysis

  • Geramizadeh, Maryam (Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Amirkabir University) ;
  • Katoozian, Hamidreza (Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Amirkabir University) ;
  • Amid, Reza (Dental Research Center, Research Institute of Dental Sciences, Dental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Kadkhodazadeh, Mahdi (Dental Research Center, Research Institute of Dental Sciences, Dental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences)
  • Received : 2017.08.21
  • Accepted : 2017.11.20
  • Published : 2018.04.30

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to optimize the thread depth and pitch of a recently designed dental implant to provide uniform stress distribution by means of a response surface optimization method available in finite element (FE) software. The sensitivity of simulation to different mechanical parameters was also evaluated. Materials and Methods: A three-dimensional model of a tapered dental implant with micro-threads in the upper area and V-shaped threads in the rest of the body was modeled and analyzed using finite element analysis (FEA). An axial load of 100 N was applied to the top of the implants. The model was optimized for thread depth and pitch to determine the optimal stress distribution. In this analysis, micro-threads had 0.25 to 0.3 mm depth and 0.27 to 0.33 mm pitch, and V-shaped threads had 0.405 to 0.495 mm depth and 0.66 to 0.8 mm pitch. Results: The optimized depth and pitch were 0.307 and 0.286 mm for micro-threads and 0.405 and 0.808 mm for V-shaped threads, respectively. In this design, the most effective parameters on stress distribution were the depth and pitch of the micro-threads based on sensitivity analysis results. Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, the optimal implant design has micro-threads with 0.307 and 0.286 mm depth and pitch, respectively, in the upper area and V-shaped threads with 0.405 and 0.808 mm depth and pitch in the rest of the body. These results indicate that micro-thread parameters have a greater effect on stress and strain values.

Keywords

References

  1. Gosavi SP, Dhatrak PN, Narkar KM. Optimisation of dental implant. Int Eng Res J 2015;3:4319-23.
  2. Brunski JB. Biomaterials and biomechanics in dental implant design. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988;3:85-97.
  3. Mahajan S, Patil R. Application of finite element analysis to optimizing dental implant. Int Res J Eng Technol 2016;3:850-6.
  4. Kong L, Zhao Y, Hu K, Li D, Zhou H, Wu Z, et al. Selection of the implant thread pitch for optimal biomechanical properties: a threedimensional finite element analysis. Adv Eng Softw 2009;40:474-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2008.08.003
  5. Petrie CS, Williams JL. Shape optimization of dental implant designs under oblique loading using the p-version finite element method. J Mech Med Biol 2002;3:339.
  6. Shi L, Li H, Fok AS, Ucer C, Devlin H, Horner K. Shape optimization of dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:911-20.
  7. Chang CL, Chen CS, Huang CH, Hsu ML. Finite element analysis of the dental implant using a topology optimization method. Med Eng Phys 2012;34:999-1008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2012.06.004
  8. Shen S, Sun Y, Zhang C, Yang Y, Li Z, Cai X, et al. Bivariate optimization of orthodontic mini-implant thread height and pitch. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2015;10:109-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-014-1107-8
  9. Hasan I, Rahimi A, Keilig L, Brinkmann KT, Bourauel C. Computational simulation of internal bone remodelling around dental implants: a sensitivity analysis. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2012;15:807-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2011.561793
  10. Geramizadeh M, Katoozian H, Amir R, Kadkhodazadeh M. Static, dynamic, and fatigue finite element analysis of dental implants with different thread designs. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 2016;26:347-55. https://doi.org/10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2017020008
  11. Geramizadeh M, Katoozian H, Amid R, Kadkhodazadeh M. Finite element analysis of dental implants with and without microthreads under static and dynamic loading. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 2017;27:25-35. https://doi.org/10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2017020007
  12. Seong WJ, Kim UK, Swift JQ, Heo Y, Hodges JS, Ko CC. Elastic properties and apparent density of human edentulous maxilla and mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;38:1088-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2009.06.025
  13. Tortorelli DA, Michaleris P. Design sensitivity analysis: overview and review. Inverse Probl Eng 1994;1:71-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/174159794088027573
  14. Kayabasi O, Yuzbasioglu E, Erzincanli F. Static, dynamic and fatigue behaviors of dental implant using finite element method. Adv Eng Softw 2006;37:649-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2006.02.004

Cited by

  1. Long-term evaluation of the prognosis of straight and tapered implant with resorbable blast media surface: Retrospective clinical study vol.43, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.21851/obr.43.01.201903.23
  2. Optimized trapezoidal-shaped hip implant for total hip arthroplasty using finite element analysis vol.7, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2020.1719575
  3. A Comparison of Photoelastic and Finite Elements Analysis in Internal Connection and Bone Level Dental Implants vol.10, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/met10050648
  4. 3D Finite Element Study on Incomplete Osseointegration: Locator Attachment versus Ball Attachment vol.9, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2021.5680
  5. The Effect of Coronal Implant Design and Drilling Protocol on Bone-to-Implant Contact: A 3-Month Study in the Minipig Calvarium vol.14, pp.10, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14102645