The Impact of Non-technological Innovation on the Performance of Product Innovation

비기술적 혁신이 제품혁신의 성과에 미치는 영향 분석

  • 문성배 (국민대학교 국제통상학과)
  • Received : 2017.09.14
  • Accepted : 2017.12.28
  • Published : 2018.03.31

Abstract

Using data from 2008 and 2010 Korean Innovation Survey, this study estimates the impacts of non-technological innovation activities on the performance of technological innovation. The study estimates the effects of the two types of innovation, organizational innovation and marketing innovation. The estimation results suggest that both organizational and marketing innovations are closely related to the success of innovative products. In particular, non-technological innovation has significant positive impacts on the share of sales with market novelties. Among individual practices in organizational innovation, only the introduction of new business practices contributes positively to the sales of innovative products. In case of marketing innovation, new marketing methods in product design, product promotion and pricing increase the share of sales from new products.

본 연구는 2008년과 2010년 한국 제조업 부문 기술혁신조사 자료를 이용하여 비기술적 혁신 활동이 기업의 기술적 혁신 성과에 어떤 영향을 미치는지를 실증 분석하였다. 비기술적 혁신 활동을 조직혁신과 마케팅혁신으로 구분하고 각 혁신 활동이 혁신제품의 매출에 미치는 영향을 추정하였다. Tobit모형의 추정결과에 따르면 조직혁신과 마케팅혁신 모두 혁신제품의 매출 비중을 증가시키는 것으로 나타났다. 특히, 비기술적 혁신 활동은 급진적 혁신제품인 시장 최초의 혁신제품에 더 큰 영향을 미치는 것으로 추정되었다. 비기술적 혁신의 세부 유형별로 효과를 추정한 결과에 따르면 조직혁신 중에서는 업무수행방식의 변화만 유의한 효과를 보였으며 마케팅혁신은 제품디자인, 제품홍보, 가격전략 등이 혁신제품의 매출 비중을 높이는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김기국.강희종.김태양.이세민.조은성 (2016), 2016 글로벌 혁신 스코어보드, 조사연구 2016-05, 서울 : 과학기술정책연구원.
  2. 김현식.배성주.한상연 (2016), "기술 및 비기술 혁신과 성과향상 관계 분석", 산업경제연구, 29(5): 1877-1899.
  3. 김현호.조가원.박동배.서정화.이정열 (2008), 2008년도 한국의 기술혁신조사 : 제조업 부문, 조사연구 2008-01, 서울 : 과학기술정책연구원.
  4. 시장경제연구원 (2006), 시장구조조사, 서울 : 시장경제연구원.
  5. 시장경제연구원 (2008), 시장구조조사, 서울 : 시장경제연구원.
  6. 오신호, 한상연, 배성주 (2013), "기업의 재무적 성과 향상을 위한 제품혁신 메커니즘 분석 : 공정혁신, 조직혁신, 마케팅혁신의 조절효과를 중심으로", 기술혁신학회지, 16(4): 1006-1031.
  7. 하태정.강희종.박경순.강원묵.손창수.김민재 (2010), 2010년도 한국의 기술혁신조사 : 제조업 부문, 조사연구 2010-01, 서울 : 과학기술정책연구원.
  8. Arrow, K. (1962), "Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention", in Nelson, R. (eds.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 609-626.
  9. Ballot, G., Fakhfakh, F., Galia, F. and Salter, A. (2015), "The Fateful Traingle: Complementarities in Performance between Product, Process and Organizational Innovation in France and the UK", Research Policy, 44(1): 217-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.07.003
  10. Barbosa, N., Faria, A. and Eiriz, V. (2014), "Industry- and Firm-specific Factors of Innovation Novelty", Industrial and Corporate Change, 23(3): 865-902. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtt029
  11. Cohen, W. and Klepper, S. (1996), "A Reprise of Size and R&D", The Economic Journal, 106(437): 925-951. https://doi.org/10.2307/2235365
  12. Cohen, W., Nelson, R. and Walsh, J. (2000), "Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not)", NBER Working Paper No. 7552.
  13. Czarnitzki, D. and Delanote, J. (2013), "Young Innovative Companies: the New High-Growth Firms?", Industrial and Corporate Change, 22(5): 1315-1340. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dts039
  14. Evangelista, R. and Vezzani, A. (2010), "The Economic Impact of Technological and Organizational Innovations", Research Policy, 39(10): 1253-1263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.08.004
  15. Gilbert, R. (2006), "Looking for Mr. Schumpeter: Where Are We in the Competition-Innovation Debate?", in Jaffe, A., Lerner, J. and Stern, S. (eds), Innovation Policy and the Economy, 6: 159-215. https://doi.org/10.1086/ipe.6.25056183
  16. Gilbert, R. and Newbery, D. (1982), "Preemptive Patenting and the Persistence of Monopoly", American Economic Review, 72(3): 514-526.
  17. Levin, R., Klevorick, A., Nelson, R. and Winter, S. (1987), "Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development", Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1987(3): 783-831. https://doi.org/10.2307/2534454
  18. Martinez-Ros, E. and Labeaga, J. (2009), "Product and Process Innovation: Determinants and Complementarities", European Management Review, 6(1): 64-75. https://doi.org/10.1057/emr.2009.4
  19. Miravete, E. and Pernias, J. (2006), "Innovation Complementarity and Scale of Production", Journal of Industrial Economics, 54(1): 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6451.2006.00273.x
  20. Mohnen, P. and Hall, B. (2013), "Innovation and Productivity: An Update", Eurasian Business Review, 3(1): 47-65.
  21. Mothe, C. and Nguyen-Thi, T. (2012), "Non-technological and technological Innovations: do Services Differ from Manufacturing? An Empirical Analysis of Luxembourg Firms", International Journal of Technology Management, 57(4): 227-244. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2012.045544
  22. OECD (2005), Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 3rd Edition, Paris: OECD.
  23. Pakes, A. and Griliches, Z. (1984), "Patents and R&D at the Firm Level: A First Look", in Griliches, Z. (eds), R&D, Patents, and Productivity, University of Chicago Press, 55-72.
  24. Reichstein, T. and Salter, A. (2006), "Investigating the Sources of Process Innovation among UK Manufacturing Firms", Industrial and Corporate Change, 15(4): 653-682. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtl014
  25. Reinganum, J. (1983), "Uncertain Innovation and the Persistence of Monopoly", American Economic Review, 73(4): 741-748.
  26. Schmidt, T. and Rammer, C. (2007), "Non-technological and Technological Innovation: Strange Bedfellows?", Zew Discussion Paper No. 07-052.
  27. Schneider, C. and Veugelers, R. (2010), "On Young Highly Innovative Companies: Why They Matter and How (Not) to Policy Support Them", Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(4): 969-1007. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtp052
  28. Schumpeter, J. (1942), Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, New York: Harper & Row.
  29. Tether, B. and Tajar, A. (2008), "The Organizational-cooperaton Mode of Innovation and its Prominence amongst European Service Firms", Research Policy, 37(4): 720-739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.005