The Journal of Fisheries Business Administration (수산경영론집)

The Korean Society of Fisheries Business Administration (한국수산경영학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Economic Value of Marine Forests in Korea

우리나라 바다숲의 경제적 가치

  • Kang, Seok-Kyu (Department of Business Administration, Jeju National University)
  • Received : 2017.12.06
  • Accepted : 2018.02.07
  • Published : 2018.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study is to evaluate economic value of the ecosystem service benefits of the marine forests provided to our society on the basis of the global standard valuation manual. The main results of this study are summarized as follows: First, the ecosystem service benefits of marine forests are worth 771,121,551 won per hectare for a year in Korea. Second, when evaluating value based on the services benefits of the marine forests, as resource provisioning service, the annual value of the fishery potential production amounts to 58,512,271 won per hectare. The annual value of the environmental and regulatory services is estimated to total 29,574,000 won per hectare including 546,488 won per hectare for climate regulation, 85,342 won per hectare for pollution purification, and 28,942,170 won per hectare for erosion protection. The annual value of the culture and tourinsm services is estimated to total 15,317,647 won per hectare including 5,011,765 won per hectare for skin scuba service and 10,305,882 won per hectare for sea fishing. Also, the aunnual non-use value is estimate to 637,800,000 won per hectare. Third, assuming that the value of the sea forests increases proportionally to the unit area, the marine forests can be valued at 12.7 trillion won per year based on 12,208.2 hectares of marine forests creation area and 4,272.6 hectares of natural seaweed beds. Fourth, the total economic value of the marine forests can be estimated at 244 trillion won in 2016, if the value of the marine forests permanently continues in the future by applying 5.5% of the social discount rate. The results of this study are expected to serve as a valuable information for improving awareness of the value of marine forests ecosystem and ensuring the validity of the marine forests creation policy by converting the value of the marine forests's ecosystem service into monetary units.

Keywords

References

  1. 강석규 (2011), "해중림 조성사업의 경제성 분석: 제주 우도 서광리 어장을 중심으로", 수산경영론집, 42(1), 37-55.
  2. 강석규 (2016), "여행비용법에 의한 선상낚시 체험황동의 경제적 가치 추정: 제주 차귀도를 대상으로", 수산경영론집, 47 (3), 33-41.
  3. 강석규, "천연 해조장 생태계 서비스 및 편익지표에 관한 탐색적 연구", 수산경영론집, 47(3), 53-69.
  4. 강석규 외 (2017), "2016년 바다숲의 생태적 . 경제적 가치평가", 한국수산자원관리공단.
  5. 기획재정부 (2017), 공기업 . 준정부기관 사업 예비타당성조사 운용지침.
  6. 산림청 (2014), 2014년 산림의 공익적 가치.
  7. 한국개발연구원 (2008), 예비타당성조사 수행을 위한 일반지침 수정 . 보완 연구, 제5판.
  8. 한국개발연구원 (2012), 예비타당성조사를 위한 CVM 분석 지침 개선연구.
  9. 한국개발연구원 (2015), CVM(조건부가치측정법) 분석지침 개선.
  10. 해양수산부 (2012), 연안습지기초조사.
  11. Anderson, E. E. (1989), "Economic benefic of habitat restoration: seagrass and the Virginia hard-shell blue crab fishery," North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 9, 140-149. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8675(1989)009<0140:EBOHRS>2.3.CO;2
  12. Blandon, A. and Ermgassen, P. Z. (2014), "Quantitative estimate of commercial fish enhancement by seagrass habitat in southern Australia," Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 151(20), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2014.09.015
  13. Bohnke-Henrichs, A., de Groot, R., Baulcomb, C., Hussain, S., Koss, R. and Fofana, A. (2013), "Typology and Indicators of Ecosystem Services for Marine Spatial Planning and Management," Journal of Environment Management, 130, 135-145.
  14. Cadima.(1977), in Troadec. J-P. Methodes semi-quantitativees d'evaluation. FAO Fish. Circ., 701:131-141
  15. Campagne, C. S., Salles, J-M., Boissery, P. and Deter, J. (2015), "The seagrass Posidonia oceanica: Ecosystem services identification and economic evaluation of goods and benefits," Marine Pollution Bulletin, 97, 391-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.05.061
  16. CICES (2013), CICES V4.3 (January 2013), CICES for ecosystem service mapping and assessment. .
  17. Costanza, R., d'Agre, R., de Groot, R., Sutton, P., Ploeg, S. V. D., Anderson, S. J., Kubiszewski, I., Farber, S. and Turner, R. K. (2014), "Changes in the Global Value of Ecosystem Services," Global Environment Change, 26, 152-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002
  18. Costanza, R., d'Agre, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R. G., Sutton, P. and Belt, M. (1997), "The Value of the World's Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital," Nature, 387, 253-260. https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0
  19. De Groot, R.S. (1992), "Functions of Nature: Evaluation of Nature in Environmental Planning, Management, and Decision Making," Wolters-Noordhoff, Groningen, 315.
  20. FAO (2008), Human dimensions of the ecosystem approach to fisheries: an overview of context, concepts, tools and methods, FAO FISHERIES TECHNICAL PAPER 489.
  21. Fox, W. W. (1970), An exponential surplus-yeild model for optimizing exploited fish populations. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 99: 80-88. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(1970)99<80:AESMFO>2.0.CO;2
  22. Han, Q., Huang, X., Shi, P. and Zang, J. (2008), "Seograss Bed Ecosystem Service Valuation-A Case Research on Hepu Seagrass Bed in Guangxi Province," Marine Science Bulletin, 10(1), 87-96.
  23. Hattam, C., Atkins, J. P., Beaumount, N., Borger, T., Bohnke-Henrichs, A., Burdon, D., de Groot, R., Hoefnagel, E. Nunes, P., Piwowarczyk, J., Sastre, S. and Austen, M. C. (2015), "Marine Ecosystem Services: Linking Indicators to their Classification," Ecological Indicators, 49, 61-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.09.026
  24. Jackson, E. L., Wilding, C. and Attrill, M. J. (2015), "Use of a seagrass residency index to apportion commercial fishery landing values and recreation fisheries expenditure to seagrass habitat service," Conservation Biology, 29(3), 899-909. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12436
  25. MEA (2005a), "Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis," World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.
  26. MEA (2005b), Chapter 5-Biodiversity in Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Ecosystems and Human Well-being, Policy Responses, 3, Island Press.
  27. NOAA (2014), "California Eelgrass Mitigation Policy and Implementing Guidelines," West Coast Region, NOAA FISHERIES.
  28. TEEB (2010), "The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity," Ecological and Economic Foundations, edited by Pushpam Kumar.
  29. Tuya, F., Haroun, R. and Espino, F. (2014), "Economic assessment of ecosystem services: Monetary value of seagrass meadows for coastal fisheries," Ocean and Coastal Management, 96, 181-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.04.032
  30. UNEP (2014), "Guidance Manual on Valuation and Accounting of Ecosystem Services for Small Island Developing States," Ecosystem Services Economics Unit, Division of Environment Policy Implementation.
  31. UNEP-WCMC (2011), "Marine and Coastal Ecosystem Services: Valuation Methods and Their Application," Biodiversity Series, 33, 1-46.
  32. Yasushi, I., Yoshio, N., Satoshi, M., Nobuo, M., Jun, Y., Shinji., K. and Masahiro, N. (2009), "藻場による炭素固定量の 試算," Fisheries engineering, 46(2), 135-146.