수완나부미 (SUVANNABHUMI)

  • 제10권1호
  • /
  • Pages.93-116
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2092-738X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2799-7839(eISSN)
부산외대 아세안연구원 (Korea Institute for ASEAN Studies)
권호 표지

Tributary Relations of Vietnam and Japan with China during the Feudal Period: Some Reference Points

  • 투고 : 2018.02.14
  • 심사 : 2018.06.08
  • 발행 : 2018.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Under feudalism, besides imploring investiture, tribute is said to be one of the two most typical activities at the core of diplomatic relations between China and the region, in particular, Vietnam and Japan. By using the comparative method and interdisciplinary approach, the author shows that there are many differences between Vietnam and Japan with regards to tribute activity with China during the feudal period. For example, the start and end of China's tributary activities with Vietnam and Japan are not the same. The period of Japanese tributary activity was much more loosened than Vietnam. Vietnamese tributary relation was political, while Japan placed economic benefits as the main priority. In particular, the author also proved that although Japan and China had differences in behavior and level of dependence on the tributary activity of Vietnam, both Vietnam and Japan maintained independence and autonomy. Based on the historical, cultural, and geographical characteristics, as well as the position and force correlation of each country in relation to China, this article also explains the causes of these similarities and differences.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Chu, N.L and T.T. Trung. 1996. The great relationships in history of cultural exchanges China - Japan 1: Book of History. Zhejiang: People's Publishing House.
  2. Cohen, Warren I. 2000. East Asia at the Center: Four Thousand Years of Engagement with the World. New York: Columbia University Press
  3. Delmer, B. 1993. The Cambridge History of Japan, Vol. 1, Ancient Japan. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Deveria, G. 1880. Histoire des relations de la Chine avec L'Annam - Vietnam du XVIe au XIXe siecle. Paris, Ernest Leroux, Editeur.
  5. Dien, T.K.P. 1987. Wokou - Maritime history. Wuhan: University Publishing House.
  6. Du, T.S. 2000. Discussing the evolution of tributary mode. Study the problems of Nam Duong, 1(101).
  7. Duong, O. 2006. Discussing the Japanese attack against "Huadi order". DaiZong Journal, 10(2).
  8. Documents diplomatiques. 1885. Affaires de Chine et du Tonkin 1884-1885. Paris: Imprimerienationale, M DCCC LXXXV.
  9. Fairbank, J.K. and S.Y. Teng. 1941. On the Ching tributary system. Cambridge: Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, 6(2).
  10. Fairbank, J.K. 1968. The Chinese World Order: Traditional China's Foreign Relations. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  11. Fairbank, J.K. 1987. The Great Chinese Revolution 1800-1985. London: Harper Perennial.
  12. Fang, J.Z. 2009. Rethinking the "Tribute System": Broadening the Conceptual Horizon of Historical East Asian Politics. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  13. Hach, T.M. 2008. The establishment and dissolution of the tributary system - A different perspective on the history of China - Japan relations. Wuhan: Hubei People's Publishing House.
  14. Harootunian, H.D. 1988. Things Seen and Unseen: Discourse and Ideology in TokugawaNativism. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  15. Internal Affairs of Nguyen Dynasty. 1993. Compendium of institutions and administrative cases of Dai Nam, Vol. VIII. Hue: ThuanHoa Publishing House.
  16. International Affairs of Nguyen Dynasty. 2002. True records of Dai Nam, Volume 1. Hue: ThuanHoa Publishing House.
  17. International Affairs of Nguyen Dynasty. 2007. True records of Dai Nam, Volume 8. Hue: ThuanHoa Publishing House.
  18. Keay, J. 2009. China: a History. London: Harper Press
  19. Kim, S. 1979. China, the United Nations, and World Order. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
  20. Kim, S. 2008. The Evolving Asian System: three transformmation. In International Relations of Asia parcific. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  21. Ly, K.M. 1990. Trade History of the Ming Dynasty. Beijing: China Social Sciences Publishing House.
  22. Ly, K.M. 2007. Trade policy movements of the Ming dynasty to Japan. The journal of Economic history, Issue. 3.
  23. Mancall, M. 1963. The Persistence of Tradition in Chinese Foreign Policy. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.
  24. Manh, H.H. 2008. The Japanese "wandered to Tatar" before 1644 and China - Japan relations in early Qing period. Teaching history, 2(543).
  25. Moc, C.T.N. 1980. History of Japan-China cultural exchange. Beijing: Commercial Press.
  26. Nguyen, A.D. 1982. About expansionism of Daihan. Hanoi: Theoretical Information Publishing House.
  27. Phan, H.C. 2007. Regulations of successive dynasties by subject matter-matters of diplomatic relations. Hanoi: Education Publishing House.
  28. Philippe, D. 1979. China with South Asia and Southeast Asia. Hanoi: Documentation of Hanoi National University of Education.
  29. Ta, N.L. 1995. Relations between Vietnam and China in the 15th - beginning of the 16th century. Hanoi: Social Sciences Publishing House.
  30. Ton, N.D. 2006. History of China and Japan Relations. Beijing: Beijing Publishing House.
  31. Ton, H.N. 2005. Research relations of China - Vietnam in Qing Dynasty. Hac Long Giang Publisher.
  32. Tran, A.D.S. 2007. Trade activities of Vietnamese missions in China under the Qing Dynasty. Proceedings of Vietnam in Asian trade system in XVIth - XVIIth century. World Publisher.
  33. Tran, T.P. 2005. Holy national thought of Japan with China - Japan relations in Yuan Ming period. Xuchang academy newspaper, vol. 1
  34. Truong, D.N. 1974. Ming history, Vol. 27. Beijing: Zhonghua Bookstore.
  35. Tin, P.T.T.L. 1982. Japanese Diplomatic History, Book 1.Beijing: Commercial Press.
  36. Wang, Y.K. 2013. Explaining the Tribute System: Power, Confucianism, and War in Medieval East Asia. Journal of East Asian Studies, 13(2).