DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Acoustic correlates of L2 English stress - Comparison of Japanese English and Korean English

  • Konishi, Takayuki (Graduate School of International Culture and Communication Studies Waseda University) ;
  • Yun, Jihyeon (Graduate School of Science and Technology Sophia University) ;
  • Kondo, Mariko (Waseda University)
  • Received : 2018.02.02
  • Accepted : 2018.03.22
  • Published : 2018.03.31

Abstract

This study compared the relative contributions of intensity, F0, duration and vowel spectra of L2 English lexical stress by Japanese and Korean learners of English. Recordings of Japanese, Korean and native English speakers reading eighteen 2 to 4 syllable words in a carrier sentence were analyzed using multiple regression to investigate the influence of each acoustic correlate in determining whether a vowel was stressed. The relative contribution of each correlate was calculated by converting the coefficients to percentages. The Japanese learner group showed phonological transfer of L1 phonology to L2 lexical prosody and relied mostly on F0 and duration in manifesting L2 English stress. This is consistent with the results of the previous studies. However, advanced Japanese speakers in the group showed less reliance on F0, and more use of intensity, which is another parameter used in native English stress accents. On the other hand, there was little influence of F0 on L2 English stress by the Korean learners, probably due to the transfer of the Korean intonation pattern to L2 English prosody. Hence, this study shows that L1 transfer happens at the prosodic level for Japanese learners of English and at the intonational level for Korean learners.

Keywords

References

  1. Anderson-Hsieh, J., Johnson, R., & Koehler, K. (1992). The relationship between native speaker judgments of nonnative pronunciation and deviance in segmentals, prosody, and syllable structure. Language Learning, 42, 529-555.
  2. Jun, S. (2000). K-ToBI (Korean ToBI) labelling conventions. Version, 3.1. In Proceedings of the KSPS Conference, The Korean Society of Phonetic Sciences and Speech Technology.
  3. Jun, S. (2005). Korean intonational phonology and prosodic transcription. Prosodic Typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing (pp. 201-229). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  4. Kang, S., Kang, J., & Kim, K. (2012). The phonetic realization of English unstressed vowels produced by Korean advanced learners: A comparative study of English words and English loanwords. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 4, 3-11.
  5. Kang, Y. (2014). Voice onset time merger and development of tonal contrast in Seoul Korean stops: A corpus study. Journal of Phonetics, 45, 76-90.
  6. Knight, R-A. (2012). Phonetics: A coursebook. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  7. Konishi, T., & Kondo, M. (2015). Developmental change in English stress manifestation by Japanese speakers. In Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XVIII).
  8. Lee, B., Guion, S., & Harada, T. (2006). Acoustic analysis of the production of unstressed English vowels by early and late Korean and Japanese Bilinguals. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 487-513.
  9. Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English (6th edition). (2014). Harlow: Pearson Education.
  10. Roach, P. (2009). English phonetics and phonology: A practical course (4th edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  11. Saito, K., Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T. (2016). Second language speech production: Investigating linguistic correlates of comprehensibility and accentedness for learners at different ability levels. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37, 217-240.
  12. Silva, D. (2006). Acoustic evidence for the emergence of tonal contrast in contemporary Korean. Phonology, 23, 287-308.
  13. Vance, T. (2008). The sounds of Japanese with audio CD. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  14. Visceglia, T., Tseng, C., Kondo, M., Meng, H., & Sagisaka, Y. (2009). Phonetic aspects of content design in AESOP (Asian English Speech cOrpus Project). Proceedings of the 2009 Oriental COCOSDA International Conference on Speech Database and Assessments (pp. 60-65). Urumqi.