Archives of Plastic Surgery

Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한성형외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A decision-making method for breast augmentation based on 25 years of practice

  • Received : 2017.03.11
  • Accepted : 2017.09.26
  • Published : 2018.03.15
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Keywords

References

  1. American Society of Plastic Surgery. 2015 Cosmetic plastic surgery statistics. Arlington Heights, IL: American Society of Plastic Surgeons; 2017 [cited 2016 Dec 31]. Available from: http://www.plasticsurgery.org/Documents/news-resources/statistics/2015-statistics.
  2. International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2015 Cosmetic Plastic Surgery Italian Statistics. Hanover: International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery; c2006-2015 [cited 2016 Dec 31]. Available from: http://www.isaps.org/Media/Default/global-statistics/2016%20ISAPS%20Results.pdf.
  3. Adams WP Jr, Teitelbaum S, Bengtson BP, et al. Breast augmentation roundtable. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;118(7 Suppl):175S-187S. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000247288.70207.24
  4. Bengtson BP. Complications, reoperations, and revisions in breast augmentation. Clin Plast Surg 2009;36:139-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2008.08.002
  5. Jewell ML, Jewell JL. A comparison of outcomes involving highly cohesive, form-stable breast implants from two manufacturers in patients undergoing primary breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J 2010;30:51-65. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X09360700
  6. Bengtson BP, Van Natta BW, Murphy DK, et al. Style 410 highly cohesive silicone breast implant core study results at 3 years. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;120(7 Suppl 1):40S-48S. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000286666.29101.11
  7. Maxwell GP, Van Natta BW, Murphy DK, et al. Natrelle style 410 form-stable silicone breast implants: core study results at 6 years. Aesthet Surg J 2012;32:709-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X12452423
  8. Maxwell GP, Van Natta BW, Bengtson BP, et al. Ten-year results from the Natrelle 410 anatomical form-stable silicone breast implant core study. Aesthet Surg J 2015;35:145-55. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sju084
  9. Tebbetts JB, Adams WP. Five critical decisions in breast augmentation using five measurements in 5 minutes: the high five decision support process. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005;116:2005-16.
  10. Tebbetts JB. Achieving a zero percent reoperation rate at 3 years in a 50-consecutive-case augmentation mammaplasty premarket approval study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;118:1453-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000239602.99867.07
  11. Adams WP. The high five process: tissue-based planning for breast augmentation. Plast Surg Nurs 2007;27:197-201. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PSN.0000306185.95812.c3
  12. Adams WP Jr. The process of breast augmentation: four sequential steps for optimizing outcomes for patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;122:1892-900. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31818d20ec
  13. Tebbetts JB. Dimensional augmentation mammaplasty using the biodimensional system. Santa Barbara: McGhan Medical Corporation; 1994.
  14. Tebbetts JB. A system for breast implant selection based on patient tissue characteristics and implant-soft tissue dynamics. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;109:1396-409. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200204010-00030
  15. Largent JA, Reisman NR, Kaplan HM, et al. Clinical trial outcomes of high- and extra high-profile breast implants. Aesthet Surg J 2013;33:529-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X13484035
  16. Tebbetts JB, Teitelbaum S. High- and extra-high-projection breast implants: potential consequences for patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;126:2150-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181f44564
  17. Tebbetts JB. Dual plane breast augmentation: optimizing implant-soft-tissue relationships in a wide range of breast types. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;118(7 Suppl):81S-98S. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200612001-00012
  18. Mallucci P, Branford OA. Design for natural breast augmentation: the ICE principle. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016;137:1728-37. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002230
  19. Deva AK, Adams WP Jr, Vickery K. The role of bacterial biofilms in device-associated infection. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;132:1319-28. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a3c105
  20. Adams WP Jr, Rios JL, Smith SJ. Enhancing patient outcomes in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery using triple antibiotic breast irrigation: six-year prospective clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;118(7 Suppl):46S-52S.
  21. Giordano S, Peltoniemi H, Lilius P, et al. Povidone-iodine combined with antibiotic topical irrigation to reduce capsular contracture in cosmetic breast augmentation: a comparative study. Aesthet Surg J 2013;33:675-80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X13491490
  22. Craft RO, Damjanovic B, Colwell AS. Evidence-based protocol for infection control in immediate implant-based breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2012;69:446-50. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e31824a215a
  23. Adams WP Jr, Small KH. The process of breast augmentation with special focus on patient education, patient selection and implant selection. Clin Plast Surg 2015;42:413-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2015.06.001
  24. Cooter RD, Barker S, Carroll SM, et al. International importance of robust breast device registries. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015;135:330-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000885
  25. Nahabedian MY. Discussion: international importance of robust breast device registries. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015;135:337-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000921