Archives of Plastic Surgery

  • 제45권2호
  • /
  • Pages.102-110
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2234-6163(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-6171(eISSN)
대한성형외과학회 (Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

New techniques for wound management: A systematic review of their role in the management of chronic wounds

  • Bekara, Farid (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Wound Healing and Burns Units, Lapeyronie University Hospital) ;
  • Vitse, Julian (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Wound Healing and Burns Units, Lapeyronie University Hospital) ;
  • Fluieraru, Sergiu (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Wound Healing and Burns Units, Lapeyronie University Hospital) ;
  • Masson, Raphael (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Wound Healing and Burns Units, Lapeyronie University Hospital) ;
  • De Runz, Antoine (Department of Maxillofacial, Plastic, Reconstructive and Cosmetic Surgery, Nancy University Hospital) ;
  • Georgescu, Vera (Department of Biostatistics and Medical Information, Lapeyronie University Hospital) ;
  • Bressy, Guillaume (Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Gaston Bourret Territorial Hospital) ;
  • Labbe, Jean Louis (Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Gaston Bourret Territorial Hospital) ;
  • Chaput, Benoit (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Rangueil University Hospital) ;
  • Herlin, Christian (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Wound Healing and Burns Units, Lapeyronie University Hospital)
  • 투고 : 2016.11.12
  • 심사 : 2017.11.07
  • 발행 : 2018.03.15
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Debridement is a crucial component of wound management. Recent technologies such as hydrosurgery (Versajet), ultrasound therapy (the MIST therapy device), or plasma-mediated bipolar radio-frequency ablation therapy (Coblation) seem to represent interesting alternatives for wound debridement. The purpose of this systematic review was to describe, evaluate, and compare these three recently developed methods for the management of chronic wounds. In January 2016, an electronic database search was conducted of MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and Embase for articles concerning these three innovative methods for the management of chronic wounds. A total of 389 references were identified by our search strategy, and 15 articles were included. We extracted data regarding the number and age of patients, indications, operating time, number of procedures, costs, wound healing time, decrease in exudation, perioperative blood loss, bacterial load, and the occurrence of complications. The 15 articles included studies that involved 563 patients who underwent hydrosurgery (7 studies), ultrasound therapy (6 studies), or Coblation (2 studies). Six randomized controlled trials were included that compared the use of a scalpel or curette to hydrosurgery (2 studies) or ultrasound therapy (6 studies). Hydrosurgery, in addition to being a very precise and selective tool, allows significantly faster debridement. Ultrasound therapy provides a significant reduction of exudation, and improves the wound healing time. No comparative study dedicated to Coblation was identified. Despite the obvious clinical interest of the topic, our review of the current literature revealed a lack of prospective randomized studies comparing these devices with each other or with standard techniques, particularly for Coblation and hydrosurgery.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Cuschieri L, Debosz J, Miiller P, et al. Autolytic debridement of a large, necrotic, fully occluded foot ulcer using a hydrocolloid dressing in a diabetic patient. Adv Skin Wound Care 2013;26:300-4. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000429779.48138.c0
  2. Smith RG. Enzymatic debriding agents: an evaluation of the medical literature. Ostomy Wound Manage 2008;54:16-34.
  3. Shi E, Shofler D. Maggot debridement therapy: a systematic review. Br J Community Nurs 2014;19 Suppl 12:S6-13.
  4. Teot L. Debridement, a strategic choice. Soins 2011;(752): 30-3.
  5. Klein MB, Hunter S, Heimbach DM, et al. The Versajet water dissector: a new tool for tangential excision. J Burn Care Rehabil 2005;26:483-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bcr.0000185398.13095.c5
  6. Keltie K, Reay CA, Bousfield DR, et al. Characterization of the ultrasound beam produced by the MIST therapy, wound healing system. Ultrasound Med Biol 2013;39:1233-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.10.022
  7. Bortnick DP; Plastic Surgery Educational Foundation DATA Committee. Coblation: an emerging technology and new technique for soft-tissue surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;107:614-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200102000-00053
  8. OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working Group. The Oxford 2011 levels of evidence [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine; c2011 [cited 2018 Jan 18]. Available from http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653.
  9. Gurunluoglu R. Experiences with waterjet hydrosurgery system in wound debridement. World J Emerg Surg 2007; 2:10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-7922-2-10
  10. Caputo WJ, Beggs DJ, DeFede JL, et al. A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial comparing hydrosurgery debridement with conventional surgical debridement in lower extremity ulcers. Int Wound J 2008;5: 288-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-481X.2007.00490.x
  11. Dillon CK, Lloyd MS, Dzeiwulski P. Accurate debridement of toxic epidermal necrolysis using Versajet. Burns 2010;36: 581-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2008.12.011
  12. Vanwijck R, Kaba L, Boland S, et al. Immediate skin grafting of sub-acute and chronic wounds debrided by hydrosurgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010;63:544-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2008.11.097
  13. Fraccalvieri M, Serra R, Ruka E, et al. Surgical debridement with VERSAJET: an analysis of bacteria load of the wound bed pre- and post-treatment and skin graft taken. A preliminary pilot study. Int Wound J 2011;8:155-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-481X.2010.00762.x
  14. Liu J, Ko JH, Secretov E, et al. Comparing the hydrosurgery system to conventional debridement techniques for the treatment of delayed healing wounds: a prospective, randomised clinical trial to investigate clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness. Int Wound J 2015;12:456-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12137
  15. Sivrioglu N, Irkoren S. Versajet hydrosurgery system in the debridement of skin necrosis after Ca gluconate extravasation: report of 9 infantile cases. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2014;48:6-9. https://doi.org/10.3944/AOTT.2014.2941
  16. Ennis WJ, Foremann P, Mozen N, et al. Ultrasound therapy for recalcitrant diabetic foot ulcers: results of a randomized, double-blind, controlled, multicenter study. Ostomy Wound Manage 2005;51:24-39.
  17. Ennis WJ, Valdes W, Gainer M, et al. Evaluation of clinical effectiveness of MIST ultrasound therapy for the healing of chronic wounds. Adv Skin Wound Care 2006;19:437-46. https://doi.org/10.1097/00129334-200610000-00011
  18. Kavros SJ, Liedl DA, Boon AJ, et al. Expedited wound healing with noncontact, low-frequency ultrasound therapy in chronic wounds: a retrospective analysis. Adv Skin Wound Care 2008;21:416-23. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000323546.04734.31
  19. Yao M, Hasturk H, Kantarci A, et al. A pilot study evaluating non-contact low-frequency ultrasound and underlying molecular mechanism on diabetic foot ulcers. Int Wound J 2014;11:586-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12005
  20. Honaker JS, Forston MR, Davis EA, et al. Effects of non contact low-frequency ultrasound on healing of suspected deep tissue injury: a retrospective analysis. Int Wound J 2013;10:65-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.00944.x
  21. Jeffers AM, Maxson PM, Thompson SL, et al. Combined negative pressure wound therapy and ultrasonic MIST therapy for open surgical wounds: a case series. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2014;41:181-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000000014
  22. Richards AJ, Bosanquet DC, Jones N, et al. The ongoing development of a plasma-mediated bipolar radio-frequency ablation device for wound debridement. Wound Int 2012; 4:28-30.
  23. Trial C, Brancati A, Marnet O, et al. Coblation technology for surgical wound debridement: principle, experimental data, and technical data. Int J Low Extrem Wounds 2012;11:286-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534734612466871
  24. Mosti G, Iabichella ML, Picerni P, et al. The debridement of hard to heal leg ulcers by means of a new device based on Fluidjet technology. Int Wound J 2005;2:307-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-4801.2005.00147.x
  25. Falabella AF. Debridement and wound bed preparation. Dermatol Ther 2006;19:317-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8019.2006.00090.x
  26. Rennekampff HO, Schaller HE, Wisser D, et al. Debridement of burn wounds with a water jet surgical tool. Burns 2006;32:64-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2005.07.010
  27. Cubison TC, Pape SA, Jeffery SL. Dermal preservation using the Versajet hydrosurgery system for debridement of paediatric burns. Burns 2006;32:714-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2006.01.023
  28. Duteille F, Perrot P. Management of 2nd-degree facial burns using the Versajet($^{(R)}$) hydrosurgery system and xenograft: a prospective evaluation of 20 cases. Burns 2012;38:724-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2011.12.008
  29. Thawer HA, Houghton PE. Effects of ultrasound delivered through a mist of saline to wounds in mice with diabetes mellitus. J Wound Care 2004;13:171-6. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2004.13.5.26615
  30. Webster DF, Pond JB, Dyson M, et al. The role of cavitation in the in vitro stimulation of protein synthesis in human fibroblasts by ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 1978;4:343-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-5629(78)90023-6
  31. Sussman C, Dyson M. Therapeutic and diagnostic ultrasound. In: Sussman C, Bates-Jensen BM, editors. Wound care: a collaborative practice manual for health professionals. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007. p.613-43.
  32. Lai J, Pittelkow MR. Physiological effects of ultrasound mist on fibroblasts. Int J Dermatol 2007;46:587-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-4632.2007.02914.x
  33. Doyen E. Chronic maxillary sinusitis and penicillin. Ann Otolaryngol 1952;69:680-97.
  34. Haemmerle G, Duelli H, Abel M, et al. The wound debrider: a new monofilament fibre technology. Br J Nurs 2011;20:S35-42.
  35. Wolcott RD, Rhoads DD, Bennett ME, et al. Chronic wounds and the medical biofilm paradigm. J Wound Care 2010;19: 45-53. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2010.19.2.46966
  36. Sonnergren HH, Strombeck L, Aldenborg F, et al. Aerosolized spread of bacteria and reduction of bacterial wound contamination with three different methods of surgical wound debridement: a pilot study. J Hosp Infect 2013;85:112-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2013.05.011
  37. Bowling FL, Stickings DS, Edwards-Jones V, et al. Hydrodebridement of wounds: effectiveness in reducing wound bacterial contamination and potential for air bacterial contamination. J Foot Ankle Res 2009;2:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-2-13

피인용 문헌

  1. Diabetic foot management: multidisciplinary approach for advanced lesion rescue vol.59, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.23736/s0021-9509.18.10606-9
  2. Models Used in Clinical Decision Support Systems Supporting Healthcare Professionals Treating Chronic Wounds: Systematic Literature Review vol.3, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.2196/diabetes.8316
  3. Robotic waterjet wound debridement – Workflow adaption for clinical application and systematic evaluation of a novel technology vol.13, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204315
  4. Implementing TIMERS: the race against hard-to-heal wounds vol.28, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2019.28.sup3a.s1
  5. Efficacy and Safety of Low-Frequency, Noncontact Airborne Ultrasound Therapy (Glybetac) For Neuropathic Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Control Study vol.18, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/1534734619832738
  6. Polymeric Biomaterials for Management of Pathological Scarring vol.1, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsapm.8b00203
  7. The beneficial effect of traditional Japanese herbal (Kampo) medicine, Hochu‐ekki‐to (Bu‐Zhong‐Yi‐Qi‐Tang), for patients with chronic wounds refractory to conventio vol.27, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.12753
  8. Preparation of harvested skin using the Versajet Hydrosurgery System in full-thickness skin grafts vol.46, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2019.00745
  9. MODERN ATTITUDES FOR CHRONIC WOUND TREATMENT vol.2020, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.29254/2077-4214-2020-2-156-36-42
  10. Polydeoxyribonucleotide-delivering therapeutic hydrogel for diabetic wound healing vol.10, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74004-0
  11. Ultrasound Devices to Treat Chronic Wounds: The Current Level of Evidence vol.19, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/1534734620946660
  12. Ultrasound in the Modern Management of the Diabetic Foot Syndrome: A Multipurpose Versatile Toolkit vol.19, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/1534734620948351
  13. Socioeconomic effects of pressure ulcer vol.64, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2021.64.1.11
  14. Early wound bed preparation: irrigation and debridement vol.30, pp.suppl9, 2021, https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2021.30.sup9.s8