DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Correlation between the time elapsed after liposuction and the risk of fat embolism: An animal model

  • Lim, Kwang-Ryeol (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Dong-A University School of Medicine) ;
  • Cho, Jeong-Min (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Dong-A University School of Medicine) ;
  • Yoon, Chung-Min (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Dong-A University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Keun-Cheol (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Dong-A University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Yun (Ellium Women's Hospital) ;
  • Ju, Mi-Ha (Department of Pathology, Dong-A University School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2017.08.17
  • Accepted : 2017.10.18
  • Published : 2018.01.20

Abstract

Background Liposuction has become one of the most frequently performed procedures in the field of aesthetic surgery. Fat embolism syndrome after liposuction can easily be overlooked or underestimated; however, occasionally, fulminating fat embolism syndrome can develop and lead to a critical situation within 2-3 days after lipoplasty. Changes over time in the amount of circulating fat particles and the histology of major organs have not yet been studied. Methods This study was conducted using 18 male Sprague-Dawley rats aged 12 weeks and weighing 500-628 g (average, 562 g). Fifteen rats were used as the experimental group and 3 as the control group. Under general anesthesia, tumescent-technique liposuction was performed at the lateral flank areas and abdomen for 1 hour. Blood, lung, and brain tissue specimens were obtained at 1 hour, 1 day, and 2 days after the liposuction procedure. Results The average number of fat particles in the blood samples was 25,960/dL at 1 hour, 111,100/dL at 24 hours, and 21,780/dL at 48 hours. The differences between study groups were statistically significant. Both intravascular and extravascular fat particles with inflammation were seen in all 15 rats, as were inflammatory cell infiltration, hemorrhage, and consolidation with shrinkage of the lung alveoli. Conclusions These results imply that there is a strong possibility of fat embolism syndrome after liposuction in real clinical practice, and the first 24-48 hours after the operation were found to be the most important period for preventing pulmonary embolism and progression to fulminating fat embolism syndrome.

Keywords

References

  1. Wang HD, Zheng JH, Deng CL, et al. Fat embolism syndromes following liposuction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2008;32: 731-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-008-9183-1
  2. Coleman WP 3rd, Hanke CW, Orentreich N, et al. A history of dermatologic surgery in the United States. Dermatol Surg 2000;26:5-11. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1524-4725.2000.00401.x
  3. Rohrich RJ. The increasing popularity of cosmetic surgery procedures: a look at statistics in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;106:1363-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200011000-00023
  4. Glover P, Worthley LI. Fat embolism. Crit Care Resusc 1999;1:276-84.
  5. Levy D. The fat embolism syndrome: a review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990;(261):281-6.
  6. Iverson RE, Lynch DJ. Practice advisory on liposuction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;113:1478-90. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000111591.62685.F8
  7. Liljedahl SO, Westermark L. Aetiology and treatment of fat embolism: report of five cases. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1967;11:177-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.1967.tb00383.x
  8. Ross RM, Johnson GW. Fat embolism after liposuction. Chest 1988;93:1294-5. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.93.6.1294
  9. Illouz YG. Complications of liposuction. Clin Plast Surg 2006;33:129-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2005.10.001
  10. Fourme T, Vieillard-Baron A, Loubieres Y, et al. Early fat embolism after liposuction. Anesthesiology 1998;89:782-4. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199809000-00031
  11. Christman KD. Death following suction lipectomy and abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986;78:428. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198609000-00040
  12. Kiernan JA. Histological and histochemical methods: theory and practice. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1981.
  13. Kenkel JM, Brown SA, Love EJ, et al. Hemodynamics, electrolytes, and organ histology of larger-volume liposuction in a porcine model. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;113:1391-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000112748.48243.62
  14. Gurd AR. Fat embolism: an aid to diagnosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1970;52:732-7.
  15. Shier MR, Wilson RF. Fat embolism syndrome: traumatic coagulopathy with respiratory distress. Surg Annu 1980;12: 139-68.
  16. Gossling HR, Donohue TA. The fat embolism syndrome. JAMA 1979;241:2740-2. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1979.03290510048031
  17. Lequire VS, Shapiro JL, Lequire CB, et al. A study of the pathogenesis of fat embolism based on human necropsy material and animal experiments. Am J Pathol 1959;35:999-1015.
  18. Pell AC, Hughes D, Keating J, et al. Brief report: fulminating fat embolism syndrome caused by paradoxical embolism through a patent foramen ovale. N Engl J Med 1993;329: 926-9. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199309233291305
  19. El-Ali KM, Gourlay T. Assessment of the risk of systemic fat mobilization and fat embolism as a consequence of liposuction: ex vivo study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;117:2269-76. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000218715.58016.71