References
- Drubin DG. Any jackass can trash a manuscript, but it takes good scholarship to create one (how MBoC promotes civil and constructive peer review). Mol Biol Cell 2011;22:525-7. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e11-01-0002
- Hoppin FG Jr. How i review an original scientific article. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;166:1019-23. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200204-324OE
- Bornmann L, Daniel HD. The manuscript reviewing process: empirical research on review requests, review sequences, and decision rules in peer review. Libr Inf Sci Res 2010; 32:5-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2009.07.010
- Provenzale JM, Stanley RJ. A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;185:848-54. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.05.0782
- Wenzel V, Dunser WM, Lindner KH. A step by step guide to writing a scientific manuscript [Internet]. San Francisco: Scribd Inc; 2017 [cited 2017 Oct 10]. Available from: https://www.scribd.com/document/62777886/A-Step-by-Step-Guide-to-Writing-a-Scientific-Manuscript.
- Allen TW. Peer review guidance: how do you write a good review? J Am Osteopath Assoc 2013;113:916-20.
- Roberts LW, Coverdale J, Edenharder K, et al. How to review a manuscript: a "down-to-earth" approach. Acad Psychiatry 2004;28:81-7. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.28.2.81
- Lee SY. Tips on writing and reviewing articles as a non-english speaking medical doctor. Arch Plast Surg. 2015;42:1-3. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2015.42.1.1
Cited by
- Thinking about Descartes' rules when writing a paper vol.45, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2018.01025