Safety and Health at Work

Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency (산업안전보건연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Safety Perception between Foreign and Local Workers in the Construction Industry in Republic of Korea

  • Korkmaz, Serdar (Department of Energy Safety Engineering, Graduate School of Energy and Environment, Seoul National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Park, Dal Jae (Department of Safety Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology)
  • Received : 2017.01.31
  • Accepted : 2017.07.08
  • Published : 2018.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: Since the Republic of Korea became a labor-force-importing country, the number of foreign workers has increased gradually, especially in the construction industry. The main objective of this study was to examine the differences in safety perception between domestic and foreign workers at Korean construction sites. Methods: A total of 891 Korean and foreign workers were surveyed: 140 foreign and 751 Korean workers. The general characteristics and 25 factors influencing safety perception were considered in the questionnaire. Regression and correlation analyses were conducted to examine the variables of workers' safety perception. Results: Differences of nationality (F = 7.379, p < 0.001) and workplace accidents were statistically significant for both domestic (F = 1.503, p < 0.05) and foreign workers (F = 7.868, p < 0.05). In contrast, age, education, and Korean language level were significant variables only for foreign workers. Correlation coefficients of $0.428^{**}$ for Korean and 0.148 for foreign workers between two items - namely, "management's commitment to safety" and "blaming staff when they make mistakes" - support the conclusion that foreign workers do not trust management's commitment to safety, while Korean workers have confidence in these commitments. Conclusion: Foreign workers' level of safety perception should rise to the same level as Korean workers, especially in terms of obeying safety rules, safety education performance, and safety beliefs. Therefore, an improvement plan for the Korean construction industry is suggested in order to have a better safety level at construction sites with foreign workers.

Keywords

References

  1. Yoon SJ, Lin HK, Chen G, Yi S, Choi J, Rui Z. Effect of occupational safety and health management system on work-related accident rate and differences of occupational safety and health management system awareness between managers in South Korea's construction industry. Saf Health Work 2013;4:201-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2013.10.002
  2. The Bank of Korea. Economic statistics system [Internet]. Seoul: The Bank of Korea; 2013 [cited 2013 Jan 10]. Available from: http://ecos.bok.or.kr/.
  3. Lee YJ, Lee DJ. Factors influencing learning satisfaction of migrant workers in Korea with e-learning-based occupational safety and health education. Saf Health Work 2015;6:211-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2015.05.002
  4. Hasan S. Managing labor migration to South Korea: policies and problems regarding migrant workers. Republic of Korea: Brill Press; 2011. p. 2-4.
  5. Yoo KS. Foreign workers in the Republic of Korea. Korea Labor Institute; 2005. p. 1-7.
  6. Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency (KOSHA). Statistics on occupational accidents in 2014. [Internet]. Seoul: KOSHA [cited 2015 Jun 20]. Available from: http://english.kosha.or.kr/english/cmsTiles.do?url=/cms/board/board/Board.jsp?communityKey=B0925&menuId=5924&searchType=ALL&searchWord=&pageNum=1&pageSize=&boardId=17&act=VIEW#.
  7. Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency (KOSHA). Statistics on occupational accidents in 2015. Seoul; 2016 [in Korean].
  8. Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency (KOSHA). Statistics on occupational accidents in 2014. Seoul (Korea); 2015 [in Korean].
  9. Son KS, Yang HK, Guedes SC. Accidents of foreign workers at construction sites in Korea. J Asian Architect Build Eng 2013;12:197-203. https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.12.197
  10. Ahonen EQ, Benavides FG. Risk of fatal and non-fatal occupation injury in foreign workers in Spain. J Epidemiol Community Health 2006;60:424-6. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2005.044099
  11. Carangan M, Tham KY, Seow E. Work-related injury sustained by foreign workers in Singapore. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2004;33:209-13.
  12. Corvalan CF, Driscoll TR, Harrison JE. Role of migrant workers factors in work related facilities in Australia. Scand J Work Environ Health 1994;20:364-70. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.1385
  13. Elders LAM, Burdorf A, Öry FG. Ethnic differences in disability risk between Dutch and Turkish scaffolders. J Occup Health 2004;46:391-7. https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.46.391
  14. Cheng CW, Tsung CW. An investigation and analysis of major accidents involving foreign workers in Taiwan's manufacture and construction industries. Saf Sci 2013;57:223-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.02.008
  15. Guldenmund F, Bryan C, Kathryn M. An exploratory study of migrant workers and safety in three European countries. Saf Sci 2012;52:92-9.
  16. Ceric A. Communication Risk in construction projects: application of principal-agent theory. Organ Manage Technol 2012;4:522-33.
  17. Zerjav V, Ceric A. Structuring communication within construction projects - a communication breakdown structure. Proceedings of the 25th Annual ARCOM Conference, 7-9 September 2009. Nottingham, UK.
  18. Cornelissen T, Dustmann C, Schonber U. Peer effects in the workplace. Institute for the Study of labor. Bonn: IZA; 2013. 47 p.

Cited by

  1. Defining and Testing a Safety Cognition Framework Incorporating Safety Hazard Perception vol.145, pp.12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001718
  2. Safety Risk Tolerance in the Construction Industry: Cross-Cultural Analysis vol.146, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001789
  3. Evaluating the Consistency Between Conceptual Frameworks and Factors Influencing the Safe Behavior of Iranian Workers in the Petrochemical Industry: Mixed Methods Study vol.7, pp.5, 2021, https://doi.org/10.2196/22851
  4. Worker safety perception analysis of South Korean construction sites vol.27, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2019.1603709
  5. Impact of Work Value Awareness on Self-Rated Physical Health of Rural-to-Urban Migrant Workers in China vol.9, pp.5, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9050505
  6. Impact of Work Value Perception on Workers’ Physical and Mental Health: Evidence from China vol.9, pp.8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9081059