DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Investigation of Floor Surface Finishes for Optimal Slip Resistance Performance

  • Kim, In-Ju (Department of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, College of Engineering, University of Sharjah)
  • Received : 2016.11.15
  • Accepted : 2017.05.29
  • Published : 2018.03.30

Abstract

Background: Increasing the slip resistance of floor surfaces would be desirable, but there is a lack of evidence on whether traction properties are linearly correlated with the topographic features of the floor surfaces or what scales of surface roughness are required to effectively control the slipperiness of floors. Objective: This study expands on earlier findings on the effects of floor surface finishes against slip resistance performance and determines the operative ranges of floor surface roughness for optimal slip resistance controls under different risk levels of walking environments. Methods: Dynamic friction tests were conducted among three shoes and nine floor specimens under wet and oily environments and compared with a soapy environment. Results: The test results showed the significant effects of floor surface roughness on slip resistance performance against all the lubricated environments. Compared with the floor-type effect, the shoe-type effect on slip resistance performance was insignificant against the highly polluted environments. The study outcomes also indicated that the oily environment required rougher surface finishes than the wet and soapy ones in their lower boundary ranges of floor surface roughness. Conclusion: The results of this study with previous findings confirm that floor surface finishes require different levels of surface coarseness for different types of environmental conditions to effectively manage slippery walking environments. Collected data on operative ranges of floor surface roughness seem to be a valuable tool to develop practical design information and standards for floor surface finishes to efficiently prevent pedestrian fall incidents.

Keywords

References

  1. Leclercq S, Saulnier H. Floor slip resistance changes in food sector workshops: prevailing role played by fouling. Saf Sci 2002;40:659-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(01)00065-0
  2. Kim IJ, Smith R. Observation of the floor surface topography changes in pedestrian slip resistance measurements. Int J Ind Ergon 2000;6:581-601.
  3. Kim IJ, Smith R, Nagata H. Microscopic observations of the progressive wear on the shoe surfaces that affect the slip resistance characteristics. Int J Ind Ergon 2001;28:17-29.
  4. Kim IJ, Smith R. In: Marpet M, Sapienza M, editors. Metrology of pedestrian locomotion and slip resistance. USA: ASTM International; 2003. p. 33-48. ASTM STP 1424.
  5. Kim IJ. Development of a new analyzing model for quantifying pedestrian slip resistance characteristics: Part I - Basic concepts and theories. Int J Ind Ergon 2004a;33:395-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2003.10.010
  6. Kim IJ. Development of a new analyzing model for quantifying pedestrian slip resistance characteristics: Part II - Experiments and validations. Int J Ind Ergon 2004b;33:403-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2003.10.011
  7. Kim IJ. International encyclopedia of ergonomics and human factors-2005. 2nd ed. Florida (USA): Taylor & Francis Group; 2006a. p. 2563-7.
  8. Kim IJ. International encyclopedia of ergonomics and human factors-2005. 2nd ed. Florida (USA): Taylor & Francis Group; 2006b. p. 2727-32.
  9. Kim IJ, Nagata H. In: Bust PD, editor. Contemporary ergonomics 2008: proceedings of the international conference on contemporary ergonomics (CE2008). CRC Press: Taylor & Francis; 2008. p. 728-34.
  10. Kim IJ, Nagata H. Research on slip resistance measurements - a new challenge. Ind Health 2008;46:66-76. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.46.66
  11. Nanda U, Malone EB, Joseph A. Achieving EBD goals through flooring selection & design. The Center for Health Design and Tandus Flooring. The Center for Health Design (CHD). Published by The Center for Health Design. 2012. Available from: https://www.healthdesign.org/sites/default/files/chd_achieving_ebd_goals_through_flooring_design_final.pdf.
  12. Health and Safety Executive. Assessing the slip resistance of flooring: a technical information sheet; 2012. Available from: http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/geis2.pdf.
  13. Kim IJ, Hsiao H, Simeonov P. Functional levels of floor surface roughness for the prevention of slips and falls: clean-and-dry and soapsuds-covered wet surfaces. Appl Ergon 2013;44:58-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2012.04.010
  14. Yu R, Li KW. Perceived floor slipperiness and floor roughness in a gait experiment. Work 2015;50:649-57.
  15. Kim IJ. Wear observation of shoe surfaces: application for slip and fall safety assessments. Tribol Trans 2015;58:407-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402004.2014.980593
  16. Kim IJ. Investigation and interpretation of flooring wear developments for pedestrian fall safety assessments. Tribol Trans 2017:1-10.
  17. Kim IJ. Identifying shoe wear mechanisms and associated tribological characteristics: the importance for slip resistance evaluation.Wear 2016;360-1:77-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2016.04.020
  18. Chaffin DB, Woldstad JC, Trujillo A. Floor/shoe slip resistance measurement. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1992;53:283-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298669291359672
  19. Kim IJ. In: Evans B, editor. Accidental falls: risk factors, prevention strategies and long-term outcomes. Hauppauge, NY 11788, USA: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.; 2015. p. 80-103.
  20. Redfern MS, Bidanda B. Slip resistance of the shoe-floor interface under biomechanically relevant conditions. Ergon 1994;37:511-24.
  21. Jones C, Manning DP, Bruce M. Detecting and eliminating slippery footwear. Ergon 1995;38:242-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139508925101
  22. Chang WR, Kim IJ, Manning DP, Bunterngchit Y. The role of surface roughness in the measurement of slipperiness. Ergon 2001;44:1200-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130110085565
  23. AS/NZS 4663. Slip resistance measurements of existing pedestrian surfaces. Australian Standards AS/NZS 4663; 2004.
  24. Manning DP, Jones C. The effect of roughness, floor polish, water, oil and ice on underfoot friction: current safety footwear solings are less slip resistant than microcellular polyurethane. Appl Ergon 2001;32:185-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(00)00055-7
  25. Chang WR. The effects of surface roughness and contaminant on the dynamic friction of porcelain tile. Appl Ergon 2001;32:173-84.
  26. Chang WR. The effects of surface roughness and contaminants on the dynamic friction between porcelain tile and vulcanized rubber. Saf Sci 2002;40:577-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(01)00060-1
  27. Kim IJ. Pedestrian fall safety assessments: improved understanding on slip resistance measurements and investigations. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG; 2017. p. 199-224.

Cited by

  1. Understanding Friction and Wear Behaviours of Smooth Resilient Surfaces: Application for Pedestrian Fall Safety Improvements vol.2018, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3280279
  2. Occupational and health safety on cruise ships: dimensions of injuries among crew members vol.11, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2018.1554765
  3. Assessing the Safety Risks of Civil Engineering Laboratories Based on Lab Criticity Index: A Case Study in Jiangsu Province vol.17, pp.17, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176244
  4. An Assessment of the Thermal Behavior of Envelope Surface Coatings with Different Colors vol.13, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13010082
  5. Comparative Analysis of Slip Resistance Test Methods for Granite Floors vol.14, pp.5, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14051108
  6. Tribological approach for the safety assessment of flooring/walkway surfaces: Application for the prevention of pedestrian fall incidence vol.235, pp.10, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/1350650121991420
  7. Hospital flooring safety and health: knowledge gaps and suggestions vol.27, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2019.1688473