DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Per Capita Consumption Expenditure by Consumption Quintile of Middle and Older Elderly Households

중고령자 가구의 소비분위별 개인단위 소비지출 결정요인

  • Kim, Soon-Mi (Department of Consumer Sciences, Chungnam National University)
  • 김순미 (충남대학교 소비자학과)
  • Received : 2018.10.12
  • Accepted : 2018.11.21
  • Published : 2018.12.30

Abstract

This study analyzed per capita consumption expenditure by the consumption quintile of Middle and Older Elderly Households and the variables that affected it. Sample of 2,983 households was collected from the 6th KLoSA in 2016. First, when comparing the HH's living expenses by the number of family members, two persons to a person ratio, more than six persons to a person ratio were 2.007 and 4.148, respectively. The ratio increased as the number of family member increased; however, the rate of ratio increase decreased. Second, the per capita living expenses for the first and fifth quintile were 5.11 million won and 16.93 million won at the per capita living expenses that applied the OECD's equivalence scale to the HH's living expenses. The per capita living expenses for the fifth quintile was 3.31 times higher than in the first quintile. Third, among the variables influencing per capita living expenses by the consumption quintile, the marital status was the significant for all consumption quintiles; however, HH's income, HH's total asset, HH's financial asset, pension, subjective perception of the economy class, home ownership, residence (metropolitan or small city), education (elementary school), participation groups were significant in some quintiles among all quintiles. Fourth, of the significant variables influencing per capita living expenses, the most influential variables were first quintile followed by second quintile, third quintile, fourth quintile, marital status, HH's income, home ownership, HH's total asset, participation groups, residence (metropolitan), subjective perception of the economy class, in order.

Keywords

References

  1. Auh, H. (2017). Difference analysis on rural and urban household expenditures using Korea welfare panel (Unpublished master's thesis). Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  2. Baek, H. (2010). The consumption structure of Korean elderly households depending on poverty status and family type. Journal of the Korean Gerontological Society, 30 (3), 911-931.
  3. Ban, J. H., & Kim, K. H. (2008). The determinants of consumption characteristics and patterns of working poor households. Korean Social Security Studies, 24 (3), 1-28.
  4. Cha, E. Y. (2012). Consumption economics. Seoul: Orae.
  5. Cho, H. C. (2013). The asymmetric effects of health events on the consumptions of American elderly couples. The Korean Gerontology, 33 (1), 1-19.
  6. Choi, E. Y. (2016). Analysis of correlation between household debt and household consumption. The Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 7 (1), 673-688. http://dx.doi.org/10.22143/HSS21.7.1.34
  7. Choi, E. Y. (2017). A study on household income, labor and consumption of elderly households. Korean Social Security Studies, 33 (1), 117-140.
  8. Choi, O. G. (2011). The categorization of consumption for elderly in Korea: Focused on poverty and receipt of the public assistance. Journal of Welfare for the Aged, 51, 277-296.
  9. Choi, H. C. (2014). A study on the consumption expenditure over the revised life cycle (Unpublished master's thesis). Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  10. Choi, H. C., & Choe, H. C. (2014) A study on the consumption expenditure over the revised life cycle. Financial Planning Review, 7 (3), 93-125.
  11. Han, J. M., & Lee, Y. H. (2013). Analysis of the effect of increase of one person on consumption expenditure. KIET Industrial Economic Review, 177, 22-31.
  12. Hong, J. K., & Son, J. Y. (2016). A study on the consumption factor of middle-and advanced-age households : Focused on property assets and income by age group. Residential Environment, 14 (4), 297-313. https://doi.org/10.22313/reik.2016.14.4.297
  13. Hwang, E. A., & Jung Y. H. (2015). Consumption life indicators in Korea 2015. Seoul : Korean Consumer Agency.
  14. Jeong, W. Y., & Jeong, S. E. (2011). Study on the relations between the economic characteristics and life satisfaction by income levels among single elderly households. Journal of the Korean Gerontological Society, 31 (4), 1119-1134.
  15. Kang, S. H., & Lim, B. I. (2011). The effect of the pension and its type on the consumption behavior of the old-aged households. Journal of Korean National Economy, 29 (1), 87-114.
  16. KB Financial Group Inc. (2017). 2017 Korea single person household report. Seoul: KB Financial Group Inc.
  17. Kim, C. (2017). Characteristics of recent consumption expenditure through disassembly by consumption factor-restoration of average consumption tendency is the core of consumption improvement. Weekly Economic Review, 17 (42), 1-18.
  18. Kim, H. J. (2006). Consumption inequality of the elderly vs. non-elderly households. Korean Social Security Studies, 22(4), 141-161.
  19. Kim, J., & Nam, H. (2013a, June). Analysis of consumption decision factors considering heterogeneity of elderly households : Using quantile regression, Paper presented at 2013 Employment Panel Conference, Seoul, Korea.
  20. Kim, J. H., & Nam, H. J. (2013b, October). Analysis of consumption decision factors considering heterogeneity of elderly households : Using quantile regression. Paper presented at 2013 Conference Proceedings of The Korean Association of Public Finance, Seoul, Korea.
  21. Kim, M. J. (2015). Analysis for the consumption expenditure patterns of babyboomer households according to number of persons. Consumer Policy and Education Review, 11 (4), 205-230. http://dx.doi.org/10.15790/cope.2015.11.4.205
  22. Kim, M. J., & Moon, C. S. (2016). A comparison of consumption expenditure patterns and their determinants of baby boomer households and elderly households. Journal of Consumption Culture, 19 (3), 31-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.17053/jcc.2016.19.3.002
  23. Kim, M J.., & Moon, C. S. (2017). Consumption expenditure patterns of babyboomer households according to income quintile using cluster analysis. Journal of Consumption Culture, 20 (4), 71-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.17053/jcc.2017.20.4.004
  24. Korean Statistical Information Service (2017). 2017 population census. Retrieved November 1, 2017, from http://kosis.kr/eng/
  25. Korean Statistical Information Service (2018). 2018 population in old ages census. Retrieved September 27, 2018, from http://kosis.kr/eng/
  26. Lee, J. (2011). An empirical study of the effect of Korean households' transfer income on consumption expenditure (Unpublished master's thesis). Sejong University, Seoul, Korea.
  27. Lee, Y. B. (2017). Resetting poverty lines according to consumption characteristics of elderly households (Unpublished master's thesis). Korea University, Seoul, Korea.
  28. Lee, Y. J., & Kim, S. M. (2004). The economic status and an analysis of the expenditure of the single elderly household of men and women. Family and Environment Research, 42 (12), 93-106.
  29. Oh, H. I. (2012). A study on the trend of consumption expenditure inequality between elderly and non-elderly households -Using the household income & expenditure survey data from 2003 to 2010 (Unpublished master's thesis). Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  30. Sim, H. J. (2017). A study on changes in consumption expenditures of the retired household (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  31. Sung, Y. A. (2013). Cluster analysis for the consumption expenditure patterns of one-person households of different age groups. Journal of Consumer Studies, 24 (3), 157-181.
  32. Yoo, H. J., Lee A., Song E. R., & Ahn H. R. (2017). Analysis of consumption life characteristics of single-person households using consumption life indicators in Korea. Journal of Consumer Policy Studies, 48 (2), 277-301. http://dx.doi.org/10.15723/jcps.48.2.201708.277
  33. Yuh, Y. K. (2003). Consumption patterns of the elderly couple and elderly single. Journal of Korean Home Management, 21 (5), 1-12.
  34. Yun, J. H., & Kim, H. J. (2011), The relationship between retirement and household consumption. Economic Analysis, 17(1), 1-44.
  35. Wikipedia. (2018). Retrived Spetember 4, 2018, from https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/
  36. Yonhap News TV. (2018). Retrieved October 9, 2018, from http://www.yonhapnewstv.co.kr/MYH20181009005200038/?did=1947m

Cited by

  1. 중고령자 가구의 개인 소비지출 결정에 미치는 소비분위 효과 vol.57, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.6115/fer.2019.010