DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Change in the Wetland Vegetation Structure after the Ecological Restoration

생태복원 습지의 조성 후 식생구조 변화

  • Kim, Na-Yeong (Interdisciplinary Program in Landscape Architecture, Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Seoul National University) ;
  • Song, Young-Keun (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Kun-Ho (Chamecology Laboratory)
  • 김나영 (서울대학교 대학원 협동과정 조경학) ;
  • 송영근 (서울대학교 환경대학원 환경조경학과) ;
  • 이근호 (참생태연구소)
  • Received : 2018.11.19
  • Accepted : 2018.12.12
  • Published : 2018.12.31

Abstract

We studied the change of wetland vegetation structure to understand ecological restoration process of wetlands through the field survey of ecological restoration projects in Incheon, Iksan and Busan. We compared the vegetation plan at the time of planted with the results of the vegetation monitoring in 2018, and analyzed the changes in wetland vegetation structure. Based on results, we attempted to understand the restoration process of those wetlands and discuss the management measures for sustainable wetland restoration. As a result, in the Incheon Yeonhee restoration wetland, the number of plant species was increased, from 18 species in 2016 to 29 in 2018. The dominant species, Myriophyllum verticillatum, covered the wetland most and its occupied area was increased. On the other hand, the distribution area of the planted emergent hydrophytes was reduced. The area of open water decreased from 71.7% in 2016 to 48.8% in 2018. In Busan Igidae restoration wetland, the number of plant species was increased, from 6 species in 2014 to 31 in 2018. The dominant species was Myriophyllum verticillatum and its occupied area was increased. The area of floating plant communities that planned has decreased. The open water area decreased from 83.9% in 2014 to 31.8% in 2018. In Iksan Sorasan restoration wetland, the number of plant species was increased, from 13 species in 2016 to 36 in 2018. The dominant species was Phragmites communis Trin. and its occupied area was increased. The other planted species showed a tendency to be decreased by Phragmites communis Trin. and its terrestrialization. The open water area decreased from 86.6% in 2016 to 6.7% in 2018. These results suggest that wetlands should be managed by considering the change of vegetation structure and open water areas based on the following succession process, because it affects the habitat suitability of wetland organisms and biodiversity as well. Thus, the continuous monitoring for the ecological structure of restored wetland is important, and it could be possible step to develop sustainable wetland ecological restoration model.

Keywords

HKBOB5_2018_v21n6_95_f0001.png 이미지

Figure 1. Change in the dominant vegetation cover and open water area from the time of completion to the current state - in the case of Incheon

HKBOB5_2018_v21n6_95_f0002.png 이미지

Figure 2. Change in the vegetation cover from the time of completion to the current state - in the case of Incheon

HKBOB5_2018_v21n6_95_f0003.png 이미지

Figure 3. Change in the dominant vegetation cover and open water area from the time of completion to the current state - in the case of Busan

HKBOB5_2018_v21n6_95_f0004.png 이미지

Figure 4. Change in the vegetation cover from the time of completion to the current state - in the case of Busan

HKBOB5_2018_v21n6_95_f0005.png 이미지

Figure 6. Change in the vegetation cover from the time of completion to the current state - in the case of Iksan

HKBOB5_2018_v21n6_95_f0006.png 이미지

Figure 5. Change in the dominant vegetation cover and open water area from the time of completion to the current state - in the case of Iksan

Table 1. Study sites’ overall condition

HKBOB5_2018_v21n6_95_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Proportion of the area in each cover type to the all wetland area - in the case of Incheon

HKBOB5_2018_v21n6_95_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Proportion of the area in each cover type to the all wetland area - in the case of Busan

HKBOB5_2018_v21n6_95_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Proportion of the area in each cover type to the all wetland area - in the case of Iksan

HKBOB5_2018_v21n6_95_t0004.png 이미지

References

  1. An JH.Lim CH.Nam GB.Jung SH and Lee CS. 2016. Passive restoration under progress in wetland of National Institute of Ecology. Journal of Wetlands Research, 18(4), 465- 473. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.17663/JWR.2016.18.4.465
  2. Bai Jh.Cui, Baoshan.Cao, Huicong.Li, Ainong and Zhang, Baiyu. 2013. Wetland De- gradation and Ecological Restoration. The Scientific World Journal. 2013. 523632. 10.1155/2013/523632.
  3. Bang SW.Park JH and Ahn SY. 2006. Wetland Environment Forum: Policy materials. Korea Environment Institute. (in Korean with English summary)
  4. Brander, L., Florax, M., & Vermaat, R. 2006. The Empirics of Wetland Valuation: A Comprehensive Summary and a Meta-Analysis of the Literature. Environmental and Resource Economics, 33(2), 223-250 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-005-3104-4
  5. Braun-Blanquet, J. 1964. Pflanzensoziologie, Grundzuge der Vegetationskunde. 3rd Edition, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 631
  6. Cha JK.Lee SM.Choi TY.Moon HK.Kang DI.Lee IH.Seo HS and Park EJ. 2017. Diagnostic Assessment of Damaged Ecosystem and Restoration Areas and Practice of Resilience. National Institute of Ecology, Bureau of Ecological Research. (in Korean with English summary)
  7. Chun SH. 2011. Assessment of Degree of Naturalness of Vegetation on the Riverine Wetland. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, 20(1), 1-11. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.14249/EIA.2011.20.1.001
  8. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter V., F.C. Golet, E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Report No. FWS/OBS/-79/31.Washington, D.C.
  9. Declerck S., Vandekerkhove J., Johansson L. 2005. Multi-group biodiversity in shallow lakes along gradients of phosphorus and water plant cover. Ecology, 86, 1905-1915 https://doi.org/10.1890/04-0373
  10. Im RY.Kim JY.Choi JY.Do YO and Joo GJ. 2015. Changes of River Morphology in the Mid-lower Part of Nakdong River Basin after the 4 Large River Project, South Korea. Korean Journal of Ecology and Environment, 48(3), 188-194. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.11614/KSL.2015.48.3.188
  11. Gibbs, J. 2000. Wetland Loss and Biodiversity Conservation. Conservation Biology, 14(1), 314-317 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98608.x
  12. Holl, K.D.Aide, T.M.. 2011. When and where to actively restore ecosystems? Forest Ecology and Management, 261(10), 1558-1563 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.07.004
  13. Hong SJ.Kim JW.Jung JY.Kim DH.Ahn KS.Kim HS and Lee JS. 2015. A Study on the plant monitoring for artificial wetlands in the rivers. Journal of Wetlands Research, 17(1), 91-100. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.17663/JWR.2015.17.1.091
  14. Jill A. Hapner. 2006. Development of Methods to Assess and Monitor Small Wetlands Restored on Private Lands. Final Report to U.S. EPA - Region V Wetland Program Grant # CD96509801-0
  15. Kim BC.Lee GK.Yang HK.Shin JS.Jo DK.Jeon WS.No BH.Lee JH.Park HC.Choi EY.Jang HJ.Lee MJ.Ku YS.Kim MC.Seong HK.Jo BH.Kim SY.Lee JH.Baek SK.Kim JS.Kim SH.Kim SJ.Yoo JJ.Maeng DH.Khodadad Sara.Park SY.Kim HS.Park JW.Han EK.Park JW.Kim DY.Byun HK.Ha D.Park SH.Choi HM.Sim YJ.Lee JH and Lee DJ. 2014. Development of Integrative Observation Model and Application Technology for Wise Use of Wetland Ecosystem. Ministry of Environment, Korea Environment Institute. (in Korean with English summary)
  16. Kim CH.Choi YE.Kim JW.Myong H and Lee SI. 2011. 3-year Change of Vegetation and Life Form at the Man-made Wetland in Sinpyeoncheon City. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology, 2011, Vol.25(1), p.57. (in Korean with English summary)
  17. Kim HG.Jeong YS and Koo BK. 2008. The Discrimination and Vegetation Structure of Several Mountainous Wetlands in Chung-ju and Around Area. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology, 11(2), 55. (in Korean with English summary)
  18. Kim HS.Kim JK.Yoo BK.Kim DK.Gwak JW.Yoon SH.Seo SS.Shin WS.Jang KH.Kim HT.Nam JM.Hong MK.Shin HK.Lee KM.Min SJ and Choi H. 2009. A Study on Development Model and Evaluation Technique of Ecological Wetland in Four major Rivers. Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs. (in Korean with English summary)
  19. Kim MJ, Lim JC, Suh JH, Choi TB, Shin YK, Ahn KH, Cho HS and Lee YK. 2016. Wetland Management Plan on Distributional Characteristics of Vegetation in Hwaeom Wetland. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, 25(3), 190-208. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.14249/eia.2016.25.3.190
  20. Kim TS.Baek CY.Lee JY.Lim JC.Yang BK.Park JY.Lee GK and Lee JH. 2015. Guide for Restoration of Inland Wetlands. National Institute of Environmental Research, National wetlands center. (in Korean)
  21. Koo BH. 2002. A Study on the Classification and Mapping Methods of Wetlands in Korea. Seoul National University, Doctoral dissertation. (in Korean with English summary)
  22. Korean Plant Names Index. 2018.11.1. http://www.nature.go.kr/kpni/SubIndex.do. (in Korean)
  23. Kwon YH and Choi HK. 2009. The Impact of Climate Change on the Ecosystem : The Case of Wetland Plants. Korean Environment Institute. (in Korean with English summary)
  24. Lee CB. 2003. Coloured flora of Korea. Seoul: Hyangmunsa. (in Korean)
  25. Lee GG.Lee JH and Cha JY. 2014. The Management Planning Model for Wetland Conservation Area in South Korea: Focused on Conservation and Management Planning According to Making Mt. Daeam's Yong-neup Opening to the Public. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology, 17(1), 185-201. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2014.17.1.185
  26. Lee HJ.Jeong JW.Park SJ.Shin MH.Yang HS.Lee JH.Lee CS.Kim TS.Lee JY and Kang NK. 2014. Guide book for person in charge of wetland policy. National Institute of Environmental Research. (in Korean)
  27. Lee KK.Seong HC.Tang HK.Lee JH.Kim MS.Jeong HY.Lee KH.Yeon JK.Kim KR.Lee YJ.Lee MJ.Park ES.Hwang SY.Shin YK. 2010. Classification of national wetland by type and grade.Wetland Restoration Manual by Type. Ministry of Environment. (in Korean with English summary)
  28. Lee SM.Myeong HH. 2015. Vegetation and Landscape Analysis and Management Methods of Ip-am Wetland in the Naejang National Park. Korean Journal of Ecology and Environment, 48(1), 26-31. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.11614/KSL.2015.48.1.026
  29. Lee ST. 1997. 韓國植物檢索集/Seoul: Academybooks. (in Korean)
  30. Lewis, Roy. 1990. Wetlands restoration/creation/ enhancement terminology: Suggestions for standardization. Wetland Creation and Restoration: The Status of the Science. 417-422
  31. Li, W., Tan, R., Yang, Y., & Wang, J. 2014. Plant diversity as a good indicator of vegetation stability in a typical plateau wetland. Journal of Mountain Science, 11(2), 464-474 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-013-2864-5
  32. McDonald T, Gann GD, Jonson J, and Dixon KW. 2016. International standards for the practice of ecological restoration - including principles and key concepts. Society for Ecological Restoration, Washington, D.C.
  33. Nam JM.Cho HS and Kim JG. 2015. Effect of Plant Life Cycle on Plant Settlement in Diverse Water Level. Journal of Wetlands Research, 17(1), 19-25. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.17663/JWR.2015.17.1.019
  34. National Environment Information Network System. 2018.11.1. http://www.neins.go.kr/etr/ecology/doc02b.asp. (in Korean)
  35. National Institue of Korean Language. 2018.11.1. https://opendict.korean.go.kr/dictionary/view?sense_no=750958&viewType=confirm(in Korean)
  36. National wetlands center. 2018.11.1. http://www.wetland.go.kr/informa tion/marshyValue.do. (in Korean)
  37. Park HK. 2018. A study on the vegetation change and management method of ecological restoration site. Dankook University, Masters dissertation. (in Korean with English summary)
  38. Raunkiaer, C. 1934. The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography: being the collected papers of C. Raunkiaer. Clarendon press, Oxford, England.
  39. Society for Ecological Restoration Science & Policy Working Group. 2002. The SER Primer on Ecological Restoration.
  40. Son DJ.Lee HHM.Lee EJ.Cho KH and Kwon DM. 2015. Flora and Vegetation Structure in a 15-Year-Old Artificial Wetland. Ecology and Resilient Infrastructure, 2(1), 54-63. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.17820/eri.2015.2.1.054
  41. Song HK.Park GS.Park HR.So SK.Kim HJ and Kim MY. 2006. Vegetation and Soil Properties of a Forest Wetland in Jangdo, Sinan-Gun. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology, 20(4), 407. (in Korean with English summary)
  42. Sung KJ.Yee YM.Chung YH and Park SY. 2010. Development of Phragmites communis Expansion Control Methods at the Wetland Ecological Park. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology, 13(5), 1-11. (in Korean with English summary)
  43. The Ramsar Convention on Wetland. 1971. Final Act of the International Conference on the Conservation of Wetlands and Waterfowl.
  44. The U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2003. ECS 190-15 Wetland Restoration, Enhancement, Management & Monitoring. 425 pp
  45. Weisner, Stefan & Thiere, Geraldine. 2010. Effects of vegetation state on biodiversity and nitrogen retention in created wetlands: A test of the biodiversity-ecosystem functioning hypothesis. Freshwater Biology. 55. 387-396. 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02288.x.
  46. Wetzel, P. R. & van der Valk, A. G. 1996. Vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizae in prairie pothole wetland vegetation in Iowa and North Dakota. Can. J. Bot. 74: 883-890 https://doi.org/10.1139/b96-110
  47. Yi JY.Kim MJ.Yang BG.Kim TK.Choi TY.Park SJ.Kim HG.Oh GJ.Rho BH and Park SB. 2010. Ecosystem Assessment Division, Ecology Research Department National Institute of Environmental Research Korea Environment Institute. Nakdong Estuary Eco Center. (in Korean with English summary)
  48. You JH.Park KH and Lee WS. 2017. Vascular Plants Distributed in Hwapocheon Wetland, Gimhae, Gyeongnam. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology, 20(2), 61-77. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2017.20.2.61