한국압력기기공학회 논문집 (Transactions of the Korean Society of Pressure Vessels and Piping)

한국압력기기공학회 (Korean Society of Pressure Vessels and Piping)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

대형 지진하중에 대한 시편의 변형률기반 손상평가

Strain-based Damage Evaluation of Specimens under Large Seismic Loads

  • 권형도 (한국수력원자력(주) 중앙연구원) ;
  • 허은주 (한국수력원자력(주) 중앙연구원) ;
  • 이종민 (고려대학교 기계공학과) ;
  • 김진원 (조선대학교 원자력공학과)
  • Received : 2018.10.25
  • Accepted : 2018.11.28
  • Published : 2018.12.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

Abstract

In this paper, specimen tests with simulated large seismic conditions have been carried out to investigate damage characteristics such as structural deformation and crack initiation under seismic loading. The mechanical behavior of the specimens is predicted by numerical simulations and the strain-based damage evaluations are performed. Finite element analyses of the specimens under the simulated seismic loading at room and operating temperatures were carried out for low alloy steel and stainless steel materials. Peak strain amplitude, cumulative fatigue damage and cumulative strain limit damage are calculated considering the nature of cyclic loading. In all cases, the allowable damage criteria are exceeded at the time of observing cracks visually in the tests. Therefore, it is confirmed that the material behavior due to the large seismic loads can be predicted by the numerical method and the structural damage of the materials can be evaluated conservatively based on the strain criteria.

Keywords

HGHRB5_2018_v14n2_24_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1 The specimen used in the experiment

HGHRB5_2018_v14n2_24_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2 Sample time history of the input load-line displacement

HGHRB5_2018_v14n2_24_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 3 Sensitivity check for mesh sizes and element types

HGHRB5_2018_v14n2_24_f0004.png 이미지

Fig. 4 Position for damage evaluation at the maximum equivalent plastic strain (PEEQ)

HGHRB5_2018_v14n2_24_f0005.png 이미지

Fig. 5 Cumulative damage of SA508 Gr.3 Cl.1

HGHRB5_2018_v14n2_24_f0006.png 이미지

Fig. 6 Cumulative damage of SA312 TP316

Table 1 Number of cycles at detecting a crack under cyclic loading

HGHRB5_2018_v14n2_24_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2 Comparison of maximum loads between analyses and experiments

HGHRB5_2018_v14n2_24_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3 Results of the strain-based damage evaluation for the SA508 Gr.3 Cl.3

HGHRB5_2018_v14n2_24_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4 Results of the strain-based damage evaluation for the SA312 TP316

HGHRB5_2018_v14n2_24_t0004.png 이미지

References

  1. Saji, G., 2014, "Safety goals for seismic and tsunami risks: Lessons learned from the Fukushima Daiichi disaster," Nucl. Eng. Des., Vol. 280, pp. 449-463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.09.013
  2. DeGrassi, G. and Hofmayer, C., 2005, "Seismic analysis of simplified piping systems for the NUPEC ultimate strength piping test program," U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C., NUREG/CR-6889.
  3. DeGrassi, G. and Hofmayer, C., 2008, "Seismic analysis of large-scale piping systems for the JNES-NUPEC ultimate strength piping test program," U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C., NUREG/CR-6983.
  4. Snow, S. D. and Morton, D. K., 2009, "Strain-based acceptance criteria for energy-limited events," Proc. of ASME 2009 PVP Conference, Prague, Czech Republic, July 26-30, PVP2009-77122.
  5. Gupta, S. K., Goyal, S., Bhasin, V., Vaze, K. K., Ghosh, A. K. and Kushwaha, H. S., 2009, "Ratcheting-fatigue failure of pressurized elbows made of carbon steel," 20th Int. Conf. on Struct. Mech. in React. Tech. (SMiRT 20), Espoo, Finland, August 9-14, pp. 1-10.
  6. Nakamura, I. and Kasahara, N., 2015, "Excitation tests on elbow pipe specimens to investigate failure behavior under excessive seismic loads," Proc. of ASME 2015 PVP Conference, Boston, MA, July 19-23, PVP2015-45711.
  7. Watakabe, T., Nakamura, I., Otani, A., Morishita, M., Shibutani, T. and Shiratori, M., 2017, "Seismic qualification of piping systems by detailed inelastic response analysis: Part 4 - Second round benchmark analyses with stainless steel piping component test," Proc. of ASME 2017 PVP Conference, Waikoloa, HW, July 16-20, PVP2017-65324.
  8. Sollogoub, P., 2017, "The OECD-NEA programme on metallic component margins under high seismic loads (MECOS): Towards new criteria," Proc. of ASME 2017 PVP Conference, Waikoloa, HW, July 16-20, PVP2017-63119.
  9. Kweon, H. D., Heo, E. J., Kim, J. S., Lee, J. M., Nam, H. S., Kim, Y. J. and Kim, J. W., 2017, "Structural evaluation method for protection against failures of safety class 1 components under large seismic load," Trans. of the KNS Spring Meeting, Jeju, Korea, May 18-19, pp. 1-3.
  10. Kim, J. W., Song, I. H., Kweon, H. D. and Kim, J. S., 2017, "Evaluation of deformation and fracture behaviors of nuclear components using a simulated specimen under excessive seismic loads," Proc. of ASME 2018 PVP Conference, Prague, July 15-20, PVP2018-84576.
  11. ASME BPVC Sec. II Part D, 2010, "Properties Materials," American Society of Mechanical Engineers, NY.
  12. ASTM E1820-15, 2015, "Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fracture Toughness," ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
  13. Chaboche, J. L., 1986, "Time-independent constitutive theories for cyclic plasticity," Int. J. Plasticity, Vol. 2, pp. 149-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-6419(86)90010-0
  14. Dassault Systems, 2016, ABAQUS Analysis User's Guide, France.
  15. Ammerman, D. J. and Bjorkman, G. S., 2008, "Strain-based acceptance criteria for inelastic analysis," Proc. of ASME 2008 PVP Conference, Chicago, IL, July 27-31, PVP2008-61728.
  16. ASME BPVC Sec. III Div.1 Sub. NB, 2001, "Rules for Construction of Nuclear Facility Components," America Society of Mechanical Engineers, NY.
  17. Adams, T. M., 2015, "Basis of the upcoming changes to piping seismic design rules in the ASME BPVC Section III, Division 1, Article NB-3200," Proc. of ASME 2015 PVP Conference, Boston, MA, July 19-23, PVP2015-45697.
  18. Morishita, M., Otani, A., Watakabe, T., Nakamura I., Shibutani, T. and Shiratori, M., 2017, "Seismic qualification of piping systems by detailed inelastic response analysis: Part 1 - A code case for piping seismic evaluation based on detailed inelastic response analysis," Proc. of ASME 2017 PVP Conference, Waikoloa, HW, July 16-20, PVP2017-65166.
  19. ASME BPVC Sec. III Sub. HB, 2017, "Class A metallic pressure boundary components," American Society for Mechanical Engineers, NY.
  20. ASME BPVC Sec. VIII Div. 2 Part 5, 2015, "Design by analysis requirements," American Society for Mechanical Engineers, NY.