DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

영상정보에 의한 모돈의 분만징후 행동특성 분류

Classification of behavior at the signs of parturition of sows by image information analysis

  • 양가영 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 전중환 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 권경석 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 최희철 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 하재정 (경상북도 축산기술연구소) ;
  • 김종복 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 이준엽 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원)
  • Yang, Ka-Young (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Jeon, Jung-Hwan (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kwon, Kyeong-Seok (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Choi, Hee-Chul (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Ha, Jae-Jung (Gyeongsangbuk-Do Livestock Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, Jong-Bok (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Lee, Jun-Yeob (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration)
  • 투고 : 2018.09.13
  • 심사 : 2018.12.07
  • 발행 : 2018.12.31

초록

본 연구는 모돈의 분만징후에 따른 예비행동특성 분석 및 분류를 통하여 정확한 분만시점을 예측하고자 본 실험을 진행하였다. 모돈 12마리(평균 3.5 산차)에서 분만전 징후의 행동특성으로 측정된 행동은 지속시간에 따라 분석된 기본행동(섭식, 서기, 눕기, 앉기)과 빈도로 분석된 특이행동(탐색, 저작, 긁기, 스톨물기)으로 나뉜다. 분만 24시간 전부터 첫 태아가 나오는 시점까지 시간대별 2분 간격으로 영상정보를 녹화 및 수집하여 분석하였다. 그 결과 모돈의 기본행동 중 서기시간(22.6%; 24H, 24.9%; 12H)과 횡와시간(55.9% ;24H, 66.3% ;12H)은 분만 24시간 전의 빈도가 유의적으로 낮게 나타났다(p<0.01). 섭식시간(13.42% 24H, 4.38% 12H)과 앉기시간(8.2% 24H, 4.5% 12H)은 분만 12시간 전부터 감소하는 경향을 보였다(p>0.05). 모돈의 특이행동 중 탐색행동($11.44{\pm}1.80$ 24H, $55.97{\pm}6.13$ 12H), 바닥을 긁는 행동 ($3.75{\pm}1.92$ 24H, $20.99{\pm}5.8$ 12H) 및 스톨물기 행동($0.69{\pm}0.15$ 24H, $3.71{\pm}1.53$ 12H)은 분만 24시간 전 보다, 분만시간이 점점 다가오는 12시간 전부터 점진적으로 빈도가 증가하였다 (p<0.01). 반면 저작행동 ($2.20{\pm}1.67$ 24H, $0.07{\pm}0.01$ 12H)은 분만 12시간 전부터 감소하는 경향을 보였다(p>0.05). 결과적으로 분만시점이 다가갈수록 서기 탐색 긁기 스톨물기 행동이 높게 발현되는 것으로 나타났다.

The aim of this study is to predict the exact time of parturition from analysis and classification of preliminary behavior based on parturition signals in sows. This study was conducted with 12 crossbred sows (with an average of 3.5 parities). Behavioral characteristics were analyzed for duration and the frequency of different behaviors on a checklist, which includes the duration of the basic behaviors (feeding, standing, lying down, and sitting). The frequency of specific behaviors (investigatory behavior, shame-chewing, scratching, and bar-biting) was also recorded. Image information was collected every two minutes for 24 hours before the first piglets were born. As a result, the basic behavior of a sows' standing time (22.6% of the time after 24 h, 24.9% after 12 h) and time lying down (55.9% after 24 h, 66.3% after 12 h) increased over the 12 h period before parturition, compared with the 24 h period before parturition (p<0.01). Feeding (13.42% after 24 h, 4.38% after 12 h) and sitting (8.2% after 24 h, 4.5% after 12 h) tended to decrease during the 12 h before parturition (p>0.05). The sows' investigatory behavior ($11.44{\pm}1.80$ after 24 h, $55.97{\pm}6.13$ after 12 h), scratching ($3.75{\pm}1.92$ after 24 h, $20.99{\pm}5.81$ after 12 h), and bar-biting ($0.69{\pm}0.15$ after 24 h, $3.71{\pm}1.53$ after 12 h) increased in the 12-hour period before parturition, compared with the 24-hour period before parturition (p<0.01). On the other hand, shame-chewing ($2.20{\pm}1.67$ after 24 h, $0.07{\pm}0.01$ after 12 h) decreased compared to the 12-hour period before parturition (p>0.05). Thus, standing, investigatory behavior, scratching, and bar-biting could be used as behaviors indicative of parturition in sows.

키워드

SHGSCZ_2018_v19n12_607_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Basic behavioral characteristic of sows captured by CCTV camera (Measure of time budget, min./h)

SHGSCZ_2018_v19n12_607_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. Specific behavioral characteristic of sows captured by CCTV camera (Measure of frequence (no./h.)

SHGSCZ_2018_v19n12_607_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 3. Association between time and measure of time budget to basic behavior.

SHGSCZ_2018_v19n12_607_f0004.png 이미지

Fig. 4. Frequency of behavioral change (n=12 sows, ** from paired-sample Wilcoxon signed-rank test). ns, not significant.

Table 1. The percentage of time spent in basic behavior for different 12h vs. 24h

SHGSCZ_2018_v19n12_607_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. The count of frequency in specific behavior for different 12h vs. 24h

SHGSCZ_2018_v19n12_607_t0002.png 이미지

참고문헌

  1. Z. Lou, J. F. Hurnik, "Peripartum sows in three farrowing crates: posture patterns and behavioural activities", Applied Animal Behaviour Science, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 77-86, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(96)01144-6
  2. G. Illmann, H. Chaloupkova, K. Neuhauserova, "Effect of pre-and post-partum sow activity on maternal behaviour and piglet weight gain 24 h after birth", Applied Animal Behaviour Science, vol. 163, no. 1, pp. 80-88. 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2014.11.011
  3. A. V. Viscardi, M. Hunniford, P. Lawlis, M. Leach, P. V. Turner, "Development of a piglet grimace scale to evaluate piglet pain using facial expressions following castration and tail docking: a pilot study", Frontiers in veterinary science, vol. 4, no. 51, pp. 1-9, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2017.00051
  4. E. M. Rosvold, R. C. Newberry, T. Framstad, I. L. Andersen, "Nest-building behaviour and activity budgets of sows provided with different materials", Applied Animal Behaviour Science, vol. 200, no. 1, pp.36-44, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2017.12.003
  5. G. Hoffmann, A. Benke, M. Schmidt, C. Ammon, C. Manteuffel, P. C. Schon, "Postpartum changes in the lying behavior of sows in farrowing crates", Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 43-48, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2016.12.013
  6. J Turner, "The welfare of Europe's sows in close confinement stalls", Compassion in World Farming Trust, pp. 28, 2000.
  7. Y. Koretsu, S. Tani, R. Lida, "Factors for improving reproductive performance of sows and gerd productivity in commercial breeding herds", Porcine health management, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1-10, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-016-0049-7
  8. M. A. Kashiha, C. Bahr, S. Ott, C. P. Moons, T. A. Niewold, F. Tuyttens, D. Berckmans, "Automatic monitoring of pig locomotion using image analysis", Livestock Science, col. 159, no. 1, pp. 141-148, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2013.11.007
  9. F. Lao, T. M. Brown-Brandl, G. Teng, K. Liu, H. Xin, "Sow lying behaviors before, during and after farrowing. In: 2016 ASABE Annual International Meeting", American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, pp. 1, 2016.
  10. E. Leslie, M. H. Jover, R. Newman, R. Holyoake, "Assessment of acute pain experienced by piglets from ear tagging, ear notching and intraperitoneal injectable transponders", Applied Animal Behaviour Science, vol. 127, no. 4, pp. 86-95, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2010.09.006
  11. Ymaging, www.ymaging.com/projects-2/pigwei, eu, accessed 20/06/2018.
  12. Fancome for ward thinking, www.fancome.com/en/pigs, eu, accessed 03/06/ 2018.
  13. A. D. Montis, A. Pinna, M. Barra, E. Vranken, "Analysis of poultry eating and drinking behavior by software eYeNamic", Journal of Agricultural Engineering, vol. 44. no. 2s, pp. 166-172, 2013.
  14. P. Martin, P Bateson, "Measuring behavior: An introductory guide", Cambridge University published, pp.48-61, 2007.
  15. R. C. Weng, S. A. Edwards, L. C. Hsia, "Effect of individual, group of ESF housing in pregnancy and individual of group housing in lactation on sow behavior", Asian-Austrian Journal of Animal Science, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1574-1580, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2009.80254
  16. R. L. King, E. M. Baxter, S. M. Matheson, S. A. Edwards, "Sow free farrowing behaviour: experiential, seasonal and individual variation", Applied Animal Behaviour Science, vol. 208, no. 1, pp. 14-21, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2018.08.006
  17. S. Jarvis, B. J. Vegt, A. B. Lawrence, K A. McLean, L. A. Deans, J. Chirnside, S. K. Calveert, "The effect of parity and environmental restriction on behavioural and physiological responses of pre-parturient pigs", Applied Animal Behaviour Science, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 203-216, 2001. DOI: http://hdl.handle.net/11262/9887 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00183-0
  18. R. Grees, "On farm Monitoring of pig welfare", Wagenigen Acadamic published, pp. 19-23, 2007.
  19. P. Jensen, "Maternal behaviour and mother-young interactions during lactation in free-ranging domestic pig", Applied Animal Behaviour Science, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 297-308, 1988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(88)90054-8
  20. F. Christian, M. Pernille, A. Sandra, A. Vivi, "Confinement of sows 24hours before expected farrowing affects the performance of nest building behaviours but not progress of parturition", Applied Animal Behaviour Science, vol. 188, no. 1, pp. 1-8, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2017.01.003
  21. G. M. Cronin, J. A. Smith, "Effects of accommodation type and straw bedding around parturition and during lactation on the behaviour of primiparous sows and survival and growth of piglets to weaning", Applied Animal Behaviour Science, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 191-208, 1992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(05)80007-3