DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Validation of Nafamostat Mesilate as an Anticoagulant in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Large-Animal Experiment

  • Han, Sung Joon (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Chungnam National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Han, Woosik (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Chungnam National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Song, Hee-Jung (Department of Neurology, Chungnam National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Cuk-Seong (Department of Physiology, Chungnam National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Jeong, Seong-Mok (Department of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kang, Min Woong (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Chungnam National University School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2017.08.29
  • Accepted : 2017.10.20
  • Published : 2018.04.05

Abstract

Background: Unfractionated heparin is commonly used for anticoagulation in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Several studies have shown that nafamostat mesilate (NM) has comparable clinical outcomes to unfractionated heparin. This study compared anticoagulation with NM and heparin in a large-animal model. Methods: Beagle dogs (n=8; weight, 6.5-9 kg) were placed on venovenous ECMO. Blood samples were taken every hour and the following parameters were compared: hemoglobin level, activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), thromboelastography (TEG) data, platelet function, and inflammatory cytokine levels. Results: In both groups, the aPTT was longer than the baseline value. Although the aPTT in the NM group was shorter than in the heparin group, the TEG parameters were similar between the 2 groups. Hemoglobin levels decreased in both groups, but the decrease was less with NM than with heparin (p=0.049). Interleukin $(IL)-1{\beta}$ levels significantly decreased in the NM group (p=0.01), but there was no difference in the levels of tumor necrosis factor alpha or IL-10 between the 2 groups. Conclusion: NM showed a similar anticoagulant effect to that of unfractionated heparin, with fewer bleeding complications. NM also had anti-inflammatory properties during ECMO. Based on this preclinical study, NM may be a good alternative candidate for anticoagulation in ECMO.

Keywords

References

  1. Zangrillo A, Landoni G, Biondi-Zoccai G, et al. A metaanalysis of complications and mortality of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Crit Care Resusc 2013;15:172-8.
  2. Tolwani AJ, Wille KM. Anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy. Semin Dial 2009;22:141-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-139X.2008.00545.x
  3. Han SJ, Kim HS, Kim KI, et al. Use of nafamostat mesilate as an anticoagulant during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Korean Med Sci 2011;26:945-50. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2011.26.7.945
  4. Traverso CI, Caprini JA, Arcelus JI. The normal thromboelastogram and its interpretation. Semin Thromb Hemost 1995;21 Suppl 4:7-13.
  5. Marasco SF, Lukas G, McDonald M, McMillan J, Ihle B. Review of ECMO (extra corporeal membrane oxygenation) support in critically ill adult patients. Heart Lung Circ 2008;17 Suppl 4:S41-7.
  6. Sell LL, Cullen ML, Whittlesey GC, et al. Hemorrhagic complications during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: prevention and treatment. J Pediatr Surg 1986;21:1087-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3468(86)90015-1
  7. Hwang SD, Hyun YK, Moon SJ, Lee SC, Yoon SY. Nafamostat mesilate for anticoagulation in continuous renal replacement therapy. Int J Artif Organs 2013;36:208-16. https://doi.org/10.5301/ijao.5000191
  8. Murase M, Usui A, Tomita Y, Maeda M, Koyama T, Abe T. Nafamostat mesilate reduces blood loss during open heart surgery. Circulation 1993;88(5 Pt 2):II432-6.
  9. Gery I, Gershon RK, Waksman BH. Potentiation of the T-lymphocyte response to mitogens: I. the responding cell. J Exp Med 1972;136:128-42.
  10. Gery I, Handschumacher RE. Potentiation of the T lymphocyte response to mitogens: III. properties of the mediator( s) from adherent cells. Cell Immunol 1974;11:162-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8749(74)90016-1
  11. Gery I, Waksman BH. Potentiation of the T-lymphocyte response to mitogens: II. the cellular source of potentiating mediator(s). J Exp Med 1972;136:143-55. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.136.1.143
  12. Bronicki RA, Hall M. Cardiopulmonary bypass-induced inflammatory response: pathophysiology and treatment. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2016;17(8 Suppl 1):S272-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000000759
  13. Muto S, Imai M, Asano Y. Mechanisms of the hyperkalaemia caused by nafamostat mesilate: effects of its two metabolites on $Na^+$ and $K^+$ transport properties in the rabbit cortical collecting duct. Br J Pharmacol 1994;111:173-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.1994.tb14040.x
  14. Muto S, Imai M, Asano Y. Mechanisms of hyperkalemia caused by nafamostat mesilate. Gen Pharmacol 1995;26: 1627-32.

Cited by

  1. Molecular Insights into Human Transmembrane Protease Serine-2 (TMPS2) Inhibitors against SARS-CoV2: Homology Modelling, Molecular Dynamics, and Docking Studies vol.25, pp.21, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25215007
  2. Extracorporeal Life Support in Hemorrhagic Conditions: A Systematic Review vol.67, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1097/mat.0000000000001216
  3. New Trends, Advantages and Disadvantages in Anticoagulation and Coating Methods Used in Extracorporeal Life Support Devices vol.11, pp.8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11080617