DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Monetary Policy Rule under Inflation Targeting in Mongolia

  • Received : 2018.04.12
  • Accepted : 2018.11.16
  • Published : 2018.12.30

Abstract

This article aims to review the monetary policy rule under inflation targeting framework focusing on Mongolia. The empirical analysis estimates the policy reaction function to see if the inflation targeting has been linked with a monetary policy rule emphasizing on inflation stabilization since its adoption in 2007. The study contributes to the literature by examining the linkage between Mongolian monetary policy rule and inflation targeting directly and thoroughly for the first time and also by taking into account a recent progress in the inflation targeting framework toward forward-looking mode. The main findings were: the Mongolian current monetary policy rule under inflation targeting is characterized as inflation-responsive rule with forward-looking manner (one quarter ahead); the inflation responsiveness is, however, weak enough to be pro-cyclical to inflation pressure; and the rule is also responsive to exchange rate due to the "fear of floating", which weakens the policy reaction to inflation and output gap.

Keywords

References

  1. Aizenman, J., Chinn, M. D. and H. Ito. 2010. "The Emerging Global Financial Architecture: Tracing and Evaluating New Patterns of the Trilemma Configuration," Journal of International Money and Finance, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 615-641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2010.01.005
  2. Bayardavaa, B., Undral, B. and C. Altan-ulzii. 2015. Monetary Policy Transmission in Mongolia. Bank of Mongolia Research Book, vol. 10, pp. 92-133. (accessed January 21, 2018)
  3. Bernanke, B. S. and F. S. Mishkin. 1997. "Inflation Targeting: A New Framework for Monetary Policy?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 97-116. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.11.2.97
  4. Bernanke, B. S., Laubach, T., Mishkin, F. S. and A. S. Posen. 1999. Inflation Targeting: Lessons from the International Experience. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  5. Bhargava, A. 1986. "On the Theory of Testing for Unit Roots in Observed Time Series," Review of Economic Studies, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 369-384. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297634
  6. Buyandelger, O. E. 2015. "Exchange Rate Pass-through Effect and Monetary Policy in Mongolia: Small Open Economy DSGE Model," Procedia Economics and Finance, vol. 26, pp. 1185-1192. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00950-8
  7. Cai, Y. and H. Taguchi. 2015. "Monetary Policy Rule under Financial Deregulation in China," Economics Bulletin, vol. 35, no.1, pp. 122-132.
  8. Calvo, G. and C. Reinhart. 2002. "Fear of Floating," Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 379-408.
  9. Clarida, R. and M. Gertler. 1997. How the Bundesbank Conducts Monetary Policy. In Romer, C. and D. Romer. (eds.) Reducing Inflation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 363-412.
  10. Clarida, R., Gali, J. and M. Gertler. 1998a. Monetary Policy Rules and Macroeconomic Stability: Theory and Some Evidence. NBER Working Paper, no. 6442.
  11. Clarida, R., Gali, J. and M. Gertler. 1998b. "Monetary Policy Rules in Practice: Some International Evidence," European Economic Review, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1033-1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00016-6
  12. Eichengreen, B. 2002. Can Emerging Markets Float? Should They Inflation Target?. Working Paper, no. 36. Banco Central do Brazil.
  13. Gagnon, J. E. and J. Ihrig. 2004. "Monetary Policy and Exchange Rate Pass-through," International Journal of Finance and Economics, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 315-338. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.253
  14. Ito, T. and T. Hayashi. 2004. Inflation targeting in Asia. Occasional Paper, no. 1. Hong Kong Institute for Monetary Research.
  15. Khishigjargal, E. 2018. "Monetary Policy Transmission under Inflation Targeting in Mongolia," Research in Applied Economics, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1-17.
  16. Kim, S. and Y. C. Park. 2006. Inflation Targeting in Korea: A Model of Success?. Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Papers, no. 31.
  17. Lin, S. and H. Ye. 2009. "Does Inflation Targeting Make a Difference in Developing Countries?," Journal of Development Economics, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 118-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2008.04.006
  18. Lueangwilai, K. 2012. "Monetary Policy Rules and Exchange Rate Uncertainty: A Structural Investigation in Thailand," Procedia Economics and Finance, vol. 2, pp. 325-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(12)00094-9
  19. Mishkin, F. S. 2000. "Inflation Targeting in Emerging Market Countries," American Economic Review, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 105-109. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.2.105
  20. Mishkin, F. S. 2004. Can Inflation Targeting Work in Emerging Market Countries?. NBER Working Paper, no. 10646.
  21. Mishkin, F. S. and A. S. Posen. 1998. Inflation Targeting: Lessons from Four Countries. NBER Working Paper, no. 6126.
  22. Mishkin, F. S. and K. Schmidt-Hebbel. 2007. Does Inflation Targeting Make a Difference?. NBER Working Paper, no. 12876.
  23. Ng, S. and P. Perron. 2001. "Lag Length Selection and the Construction of Unit Root Tests with Good Size and Power," Econometrica, vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 1519-1554. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00256
  24. Phillips, P. and P. Perron. 1988. "Testing for Unit Root in Time Series Regression," Biometrika, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 335-346.
  25. Taguchi, H. 2011. "Monetary Autonomy in Emerging Market Economies: The Role of Foreign Reserves," Emerging Markets Review, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 371-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2011.06.002
  26. Taguchi, H. and C. Kato. 2011. "Assessing the Performance of Inflation Targeting in East Asian Economies," Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 93-102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8411.2011.01277.x
  27. Taguchi, H. and M. Wanasilp. 2018. "Monetary Policy Rule and its Performance under Inflation Targeting in Thailand," Asian Journal of Economics and Empirical Research, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 19-28. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.501.2018.51.19.28
  28. Taylor, J. B. 1993. "Discretion versus Policy Rules in Practice," Carnegie-Rochester Conference on Public Policy, vol. 39, pp. 195-214.