Journal of Ecology and Environment

한국생태학회 (The Ecological Society of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparisons of microhabitat use of Schlegel's Japanese gecko (Gekko japonicus) among three populations and four land cover types

  • Kim, Dae-In (Department of Biology, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Choi, Woo-Jin (Department of Biology, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Park, Il-Kook (Department of Biology, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Kim, Jong-Sun (Division of Science Education, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Kim, Il-Hun (Department of Ecology and Conservation, National Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korea) ;
  • Park, Daesik (Division of Science Education, Kangwon National University)
  • 투고 : 2018.09.05
  • 심사 : 2018.11.01
  • 발행 : 2018.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Background: The effective use of habitats is essential for the successful adaptation of a species to the local environment. Although habitats exhibit a hierarchical structure, including macro-, meso-, and microhabitats, the relationships among habitats of differing hierarchy have not been well studied. In this study, we studied the quantitative measures of microhabitat use of Gekko japonicus from three field populations in Japan: one at Tsushima Island, one at Nishi Park, Fukuoka, and one at Ohori Park, Fukuoka. We investigated whether land cover type, a higher hierarchical habitat component, was associated with quantitative microhabitat use, a lower hierarchical component, in these populations. Results: The substrate temperature where we located geckos (SubT) and the distance from the ground to the gecko (Height) were significantly different among the three populations. In particular, SubT on Tsushima Island was lower than it was in the other two populations. Irradiance at gecko location and Height were significantly different among the land cover types. In particular, Height in evergreen needleleaf forest was significantly lower than that in deciduous broadleaf forest. Furthermore, significant interactions between population and land cover type were observed for the SubT and Height variables. Conclusions: The quantitative measures of microhabitat use of G. japonicus varied with population and land cover type, which exhibited significant interaction effects on microhabitat use variables. These results suggest that higher hierarchical habitat components can affect the quantitative measures of lower hierarchical microhabitat use in nocturnal geckos.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ackley JW, Wu J, Angilletta MJ Jr, Myint SW, Sullivan B. Rich lizards: how affluence and land cover influence the diversity and abundance of desert reptiles persisting in an urban landscape. Biol Conserv. 2015;182:87-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.009
  2. Anderson RA. Food acquisition modes and habitat use in lizards: questions from an integrative prospective. In: Reilly SM, McBrayer LD, Miles DB, editors. Lizard ecology: the evolutionary consequences of foraging mode. London: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
  3. Ballesteros-Barrera C, Martinez-Meyer E, Gadsden H. Effects of land-cover transformation and climate change on the distribution of two microendemic lizards, genus Uma, of northern Mexico. J Herpetol. 2007;41:733-40. https://doi.org/10.1670/06-276.1
  4. Caldwell KR, Hong X, Brinker AM, Yurk DJ. Utilisation of weep holes in retaining walls by the Japanese gecko (Gekko japonicus Dumeril & Bibron, 1836) in Fukuoka, Japan. Herpetology Notes. 2014;7:235-40.
  5. Christian K, Tracy CR, Porter WP. Seasonal shifts in body temperature and use of microhabitats by Galapagos land iguanas (Conolophus pallidus). Ecology. 1983;64:463-8. https://doi.org/10.2307/1939965
  6. Germaine SS, Wakeling BF. Lizard species distributions and habitat occupation along an urban gradient in Tucson, Arizona, USA. Biol Conserv. 2001;97:229-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00115-4
  7. Gomez-Zlatar P, Moulton MP, Franz R. Microhabitat use by introduced Hemidactylus turcicus (Mediterranean geckos) in North Central Florida. Southeastern Naturalist. 2006;5:425-34. https://doi.org/10.1656/1528-7092(2006)5[425:MUBIHT]2.0.CO;2
  8. Hall LS, Krausman PR, Morrison ML. The habitat concept and a plea for standard terminology. Wildl Soc Bull. 1997;25:173-82.
  9. Hu L, Du W. Thermoregulation and thermal dependence of locomotor performance in the gecko Gekko japonicus. Acta Zool Sin. 2007;53(2):227-32. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-5507.2007.02.005
  10. Ji X, Wang PC, Hong WX. The reproductive ecology of the gecko Gekko japonicus. Acta Zool Sin. 1991;37(2):185-92.
  11. Johnston JM. The contribution of microarthropods to aboveground food webs: a review and model of belowground transfer in a coniferous forest. Am Midl Nat. 2000;143:226-38. https://doi.org/10.1674/0003-0031(2000)143[0226:TCOMTA]2.0.CO;2
  12. Kim HT, Bae YH, Kim H, Kim D, Borzee A. Gekko japonicus (Schlegel's Japanese gecko). Herpetol Rev. 2017;48:588.
  13. Kim IH, Park J, Cheon KS, Lee HJ, Kim JK, Park D. Complete mitochondrial genome of Schlegel's Japanese gecko Gekko japonicus (Squamata: Gekkonidae). Mitochondrial DNA Part A. 2016;27:3684-6. https://doi.org/10.3109/19401736.2015.1079855
  14. Lee JN, Kang SG, Lee IS. The study on the Gekko japonicus in Korea. Bull Basic Sci Res Inst Kyeongsung Univ. 2004;16:57-63.
  15. Martin J, Lopez P. Shifts in microhabitat use by the lizard Psammodromus algirus: responses to seasonal changes in vegetation structure. Copeia. 1998;1998: 780-6. https://doi.org/10.2307/1447815
  16. Morris DW. Toward an ecological synthesis: a case for habitat selection. Oecologia. 2003;136:1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-003-1241-4
  17. Morrison ML, Marcot BG, Mannan RW. Wildlife habitat relationships: concepts and applications. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press; 1992.
  18. Ota H, Tanaka S. Gekkonidae and Eublepharidae. In: Sengoku S, Hikida T, Matsui M, Nakaya K, editors. The encyclopedia of animals in Japan 5, amphibians, reptiles, chondrichthyes. Tokyo: Heibonsha Ltd., Publishers; 1996. p. 65-71.
  19. Park IK, Kim DI, Jang SY, Kim DY, Choi WJ, Kim JS, Koo KS, Park D. Preference and competition for shelters at day and night between adult and juvenile Schlegel's Japanese gecko (Gekko japonicus) in an indoor vivarium. Korean J Environ Ecol. 2018;32:373-80. https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2018.32.4.373
  20. Preacher, K. J. (2001). Calculation for the chi-square test: an interactive calculation tool for chi-square tests of goodness of fit and independence (computer software). Available from: http://www.quantpsy.org/chisq/chisq.htm.
  21. Saenz D. Dietary overview of Hemidactylus turcicus with possible implications of food partitioning. J Herpetol. 1996;30(4):461-6. https://doi.org/10.2307/1565688
  22. Shitara H. An analysis of the distribution of the nocturnal air temperature in a coastal area. Geogr Rev Jpn. 1955;28:609-20. https://doi.org/10.4157/grj.28.609
  23. Stabler LB, Johnson WL, Locey KJ, Stone PA. A comparison of mediterrranean gecko (Hemidactylus turcicus) populations in two temperate zone urban habitats. Urban Ecosystems. 2012;15:653-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-011-0216-1
  24. Stejneger L. Herpetology of Japan and adjacent territory (no. 58). Washington: Government Print Office; 1907.
  25. Tawa Y, Jono T, Numata H. Circadian and temperature control of activity in Schlegel's Japanese gecko, Gekko japonicus (Reptilia: Squamata: Gekkonidae). Curr Herpetol. 2014;33(2):121-8. https://doi.org/10.5358/hsj.33.121
  26. Toda M, Hikida T, Okada S, Ota H. Contrasting patterns of genetic variation in the two sympatric geckos Gekko tawaensis and G. japonicus (Reptilia: Squamata) from western Japan, as revealed by allozyme analyses. Heredity. 2003;90:90-7. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6800183
  27. Tokunaga S. Morphological variation and sexual dimorphis in Gekko japonicus from Fukuoka, northern Kyushu, Japan. Japanese J Herpetol. 1984;10:80-8. https://doi.org/10.5358/hsj1972.10.3_80
  28. Wada T. Distribution of house-dwelling geckos in Japan, based on a research using questionnaire. Shizenshi-Kenkyu. 2003;3(2):2-19.
  29. Werner YL, Okada S, Ota H, Perry G, Tokunaga S. Varied and fluctuating foraging modes in nocturnal lizards of the family Gekkonidae. Asiatic Herpetol Res. 1997;7:153-65.
  30. Williams SC, McBrayer LD. Selection of microhabitat by the introduced Mediterranean gecko, Hemidactylus turcicus: influence of ambient light and distance to refuge. Southwest Nat. 2007;52:578-85. https://doi.org/10.1894/0038-4909(2007)52[578:SOMBTI]2.0.CO;2
  31. Zhang, Y. P., Du, W. G., & Zhu, L. J. (2009). Differences in body size and female reproductive traits between two sympatric geckos, Gekko japonicus and Gekko hokouensis Folia Zoologicas 58(1), 113-122.
  32. Zhao EM, Adler K. Herpetology of China. Oxford: Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles; 1993.

피인용 문헌

  1. Genetic diversity and inferred dispersal history of the Schlegel’s Japanese Gecko (Gekko japonicus) in Northeast Asia based on population genetic analyses and paleo-species distribution modellin vol.31, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1080/24701394.2020.1742332
  2. Site Fidelity of Gekko japonicus to Artificially Lit Environments vol.39, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5358/hsj.39.184