Strategy21

Korea Institute for Maritime Strategy (한국해양전략연구소)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Naval Arms Race in Northeast Asia

동북아 해군력 군비경쟁

  • Received : 2018.04.30
  • Accepted : 2018.05.23
  • Published : 2018.06.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the status of naval arms race in Northeast Asia. To this end, the scope of the research was limited to national security strategies, maritime strategies and naval strengthening of the United States, China, Russia and Japan. The major powers' active maritime strategies and naval arms race give some strategic implications to the Republic of Korea Navy as follows. First, China and Japan, unlike the past, are actively using submarines in offshore waters including the Korean Peninsula. Therefore, the ROK Navy must successfully promote the Jangbogo-III-class submarine, which is currently constructed, and get a nuclear-powered submarine and P-8 MPA capable of long-range and long-time operations to enhance ASW capability. Second, North Korea's current building submarines capable of loading SLBMs and SLBMs are a new threat to the ROK Navy. The current building KAMD, which focuses on terminal phase defense, cannot effectively respond to North Korea's SLBMs and should be converted to a multi-layered defense system including SM-3 at a mid-course phase. Third, as China militarizes the South China Sea, the instability of the South China Sea is growing. Therefore, the ROK Navy should strengthen its maritime cooperation with the regional countries such as Japan and ASEAN navies to protect SLOC. In conclusion, the ROK Navy needs to build a strong naval power to keep in mind that the 21st century naval rivalry in Northeast Asia is accelerating. The navy must do one's best to protect national strategic and vital interests by strengthening cooperation with regional countries. South Korea is also accelerating its defense reforms in accordance with the pattern of future warfare and the ROK Navy do one's best to have a balanced naval capability capable of actively operating in the offshore waters.

Keywords

References

  1. 강건욱. "러시아의 부활과 해군력 증강." KIMS Periscope, 제68호 (2017년 1월 11일).
  2. 고아름. "일본, 사드 대신 값싼 '이지스 어쇼어' 도입 고려." KBS 9시 뉴스, 2017년 4월 29일.
  3. 김덕기. "네 가지 특징을 드러내는 동아시아 해양안보 정세." KIMS Periscope, 제 116호 (2018년 3월 11일).
  4. 김덕기. "트럼프 미 행정부 '최첨단 미사일방어체계 개발' 선언이 주는 함의." KIMS Periscope, 제78호 (2017년 4월 11일).
  5. 김덕기. "중국 북해함대에 이지스 구축함 최초 배치가 주는 전략적 함의." 한국해양안보포럼 E-저널, 2017년 4월.
  6. 김덕기. "미국 해군정보국 보고서를 통해서 본 중국 해군." KIDA 주간국방논단, 제 1590호 (2015년 10월 26일).
  7. 김덕기. "북극해의 전략적 가치와 러시아의 전략적 접근." Strategy 21, Vol. 15, No. 1 (2012년).
  8. 김덕기. 21세기 중국 해군. 서울: 한국해양전략연구소, 2000.
  9. 김수혜. "일, 이번 기회에 IRBM 갖겠나?." 조선일보, 2017년 9월 7일.
  10. 김수혜. "일, 지상공격 가능한 일본판 토마호크 추진, 북 핑계로 재무장 나서." 조선일보, 2017년 11월 21일.
  11. 김주열. "일 '방위계획대강 개정 앞당긴다." 국방일보, 2017년 2월 20일.
  12. 나확진. "美.印.日, '역대 최대' 연합훈련 시작...中 '특정국 겨냥 안 돼'." 연합뉴스, 2017년 7월 10일.
  13. 류재학.배준영. 일본 해상자위대, 과거의 영광 재현을 꿈꾸는가?. 서울: 플래닛미디어, 2016.
  14. 민경원, "후진타오 '해군 전투준비강화'." 중앙일보, 2011년 12월 8일.
  15. 서동주. "2010년 러시아 신 군사독트린의 내용과 시사점." 연구보고서 (서울: 국가안보전략연구소, 2010년 2월 18일).
  16. 성유진. "영에 자극받은 러시아 핵추진 항모건조 나서." 조선일보, 2017년 7월 3일.
  17. 유병은.정재호. "러시아 군사력 건설과 한.러 전략적 협력구축방안 연구." 해양전략, 제151호 (2011년).
  18. 이영선. "핵미사일 탑재 원자력잠수함 러시아, 경제난에도 증강 작업." 국방일보, 2017년 3월 21일.
  19. 이치동.이영재. "미태평양 함대사령관, Zumwalt함 한국 배치전환에 '모든 게 가능'." 연합뉴스, 2017년 4월 4일.
  20. 임경환 등 공저. 21세기 동북아 해양전략. 서울: 21세기북스, 2015.
  21. 정호섭. "우려되는 아.태지역 해양안보 정세." KIMS Periscope, 제120호(2018년 04월 21일).
  22. 진송민. "日 방위성, 北 미사일 발사에 '육상형 이지스' 최대한 빨리 도입." SBS 뉴스, 2017년 8월 27일.
  23. 한국전략문제연구소. 동북아 전략균형 2012. 서울: 한국전략문제연구소, 2013.
  24. "일 해상자위대, 두 번째 Izumo급 헬기항모 취역." 국방과학기술정보, 제64호 (2017년 5-6월).
  25. "중국, 두 번째 항공모함 진수 예정." 국방과학기술정보, 제64호 (2017년 5-6월).
  26. 吉富望, 김기호 역, "일 해자대 대 중국 해군, 남사제도 도서 쟁탈전." 世界の艦船, 2017年 3月.
  27. 山 崎. 김기호 역. "가까운 장래 중국 항모기동부대에의 대응, 해자대의 전략.전술 고찰 (공세적 방어전술 확립)." 世界の艦船, 2017年 3月.
  28. 香田洋二. 김기호 역. "일본과 중국의 해군전력." 世界の艦船, 2017年 3月.
  29. 劉華淸. 劉華淸回顧錄. 北京: 解放軍出版社, 2004.
  30. 中國國防部. 中国的军事战略. 2015年 5月.
  31. 平山茂敏. 安全保障から見た北極海航路. 東京: 海上自衛隊幹部学校, 2011年 12月15일.
  32. Armstrong, B. J. "The Shadow of Air-Sea Battle and the Sinking of A2AD." War on the Rocks (October 5, 2016).
  33. Efimov, Nikolai. The Politico-Military Aspects of National Security of Russia (Komkniga, Moskva, 2006). 정재호.김영욱 공역. 러시아 국가안보. 서울: 한국해양전략연구소, 2011.
  34. Fisher, Richard D. "China Advances Sea- and Land-Based Nuclear Deterrent Capabilities." Jane's Defense Weekly, December 15, 2015.
  35. Gertz, Bill. "Pentagon Confirms Patrols of Chinese Nuclear Missile Submarines," Washington Times, December 9, 2015.
  36. Gormley, Dennis M.; Erickson, Andrew S.; and Yuan, Jingdong. "A Potent Vector: Assessing Chinese Cruise Missile Developments." Joint Force Quarterly, No. 75 (September 30, 2014).
  37. Heginbotham, Eric et al. The U.S.-China Military Score Card: Forces, Geography, and the Evolving Balance of Power 1996-2017. Santa Monica, Calif.: RAND, 2015.
  38. Huxley, Tim and Schreer,, Benjamin. "Missing Asia Strategy." Survival, Vol. 59, No. 3 (June-July 2017)
  39. Kim, Duk-ki. "Russo-Japanese National Strategies Over the Kuril Islands." Strategy 21, Vol. 1, No. 2 (Winter 1998).
  40. Koda, Yoji. "Japan's Perception and Interests in the South China Sea." Asia Policy, No. 21 (January 2016).
  41. Krepinevich, F. Why AirSea Battle?. Washington, D. C.: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, 2010.
  42. Kristensen, Hans M. "Chinese Nuclear Developments Described (and Omitted) by DoD Report." FAS Security Blog, May 14, 2013.
  43. LaGrone, Sam. "Russia and China to Hold 2015 Naval Exercises in Mediterranean, Pacific." U.S. Naval Institute News, November 20, 2014.
  44. Lin, Jeffrey and Singer, P. W. "China's Largest Surface Warship Takes Shape." Popular Science, October 20, 2016.
  45. Martinage, Robert. Toward a New Offset Strategy. Washington, D. C.: CSBA, 2014.
  46. O'Rourke, Ronald. China Naval Modernization: Implications for U.S. Navy Capabilities-Background and Issues for Congress. Washington, D. C.: Congress Research Service, 2011.
  47. O'Rourke, Ronald. China Navy Modernization: Implications for U.S. Navy Capabilities. Washington, D. C.: US Congressional Research Service, 2017.
  48. O'Rourke, Ronald. Navy Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense(BMD) Program: Background and Issues for Congress. Washington, D. C.: U.S. Congress Research Service, May 12, 2017.
  49. O'Rourke, Ronald. Navy Virginia(SSN-774)-Class Attack Submarine Procurement: Background and Issues for Congress. Washington, D. C.: Congressional Research Service, June 1, 2015.
  50. Panov, Andrey. Russian Sea Power and Strategy. 정재호.유영철 역. 러시아 해양력과 해양전략. 서울: 한국국방연구원, 2016.
  51. Reed, Nicholas J. Air Sea Battle to Joint Concept for Access and Maneuver in the Global Commons. Norfolk, VA: National Defense University, Joint Forces Staff College, December 2015.
  52. Roper, William B. Director, Strategic Capabilities Office. "Strategy and Implementation of the Department of the Department of Defense's Technology Offsets Initiative in Review of the Defense Authorization Request for Fiscal Year 2017." Statement at the U.S. Senate Committee on Armed Services, April 12, 2016.
  53. Rosen, Mark. The U.S.-India Defense Relationship: Putting the Foundational Agreements in Perspective. Washington, D. C.: Center for Naval Analysis, February 2017.
  54. Tol, Jan van, et al. AirSea Battle: A Point-of-Departure Operational Concept. Washington, D. C.: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, 2010.
  55. U.S. Department of Defense(DoD). Annual Report to Congress on Military and Security Developments Involving the People's Republic of China 2016. Washington, D. C.: DoD, 2016.
  56. U.S. Department of Defense(DoD). Annual Report to Congress on Military and Security Developments Involving the People's Republic of China 2017(CMSD 2017). Washington, D. C.: DoD, 2017.
  57. U.S. Department of Defense(DoD). Asia-Pacific Maritime Security Strategy. Washington, D. C.: US DoD, August 2015.
  58. U.S. Department of Defense(DoD). Framework For the U.S.-India Defense Relationship. Washington, D. C.: DoD, June 3, 2015.
  59. U.S. Government Accountability Office(GAO). Defense Acquisitions: Assessing of Selected Weapon System Programs. Washington, D. C.: GAO, May 2017.
  60. U.S. Navy. "Attack Submarines-SSN." Fact Sheet, November 27, 2012.
  61. U.S. Navy. A Cooperative Strategy for 21st Century Seapower. Washington, D. C.: Department of US Navy, March 2015.
  62. U.S. Office of Naval Intelligence(ONI). The PLA Navy: New Capabilities and Missions for the 21st Century. Washington, D. C.: ONI, 2009.
  63. U.S. Office of Naval Intelligence(ONI). The PLA Navy: New Capabilities and Missions for the 21th Century. Washington, D. C.: ONI, April 2015.
  64. U.S. Office of Naval Intelligence(ONI). The PLA Navy: New Capabilities and Missions for the 21th Century. Washington, D. C.: ONI, April 2017.
  65. Xin, Liu and Caiyu, Liu. "China eyes Building more Aircraft Carriers." Global Times, April 20, 2017.