대한감각통합치료학회지 (The Journal of Korean Academy of Sensory Integration)

  • 제16권3호
  • /
  • Pages.11-21
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1738-0405(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-115X(eISSN)
대한감각통합치료학회 (Korean Academy of Sensory Integration)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

대학생의 감각처리 유형과 학습유형, 학습전략의 상관관계

The Correlation of Sensory Processing Type, Learning Styles and Learning Strategies for University Students

  • 홍소영 (고신대학교 작업치료학과)
  • Hong, Soyoung (Department of Occupational Therapy, Kosin University)
  • 투고 : 2018.10.31
  • 심사 : 2018.12.19
  • 발행 : 2018.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

목적 : 본 연구는 대학생의 감각처리 유형과 학습유형, 학습전략 간에 상관관계를 조사하고자 실시되었다. 연구방법 : 부산소재 K대학교의 학생 115명을 대상으로 실시하였다. 측정도구는 청소년/성인 감각프로파일(Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile; AASP)과 학습과정 설문지(Study Process Questionnaire; SPQ)와 학습동기전략 설문지(Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnarie; MSLQ)를 사용하여 감각처리 유형, 학습유형, 학습전략에 대한 설문을 실시하였다. 수집된 자료는 SPSS/WIN 20.0을 이용하여 카이 제곱 검정(chi square test), 피어슨 상관계수(Pearson correlation coefficient)로 분석하였다. 결과 : 감각처리 유형과 학습유형의 상관관계에서 감각등록저하 유형은 표층형 학습유형(p=0.03), 감각추구 유형은 심층형 학습유형(p=0.02)과 상관관계가 있었다. 감각처리 유형과 학습전략의 상관관계에서 감각추구 유형은 조직화 학습전략(p=0.00), 감각민감 유형은 조직화 학습전략(p=0.03)및 초인지 학습전략(p=0.00)과 상관관계가 있었다. 감각추구 성향의 차이에 따라 group A와 B로 나누었을 때 학습유형(p=0.00) 및 학습전략(p=0.03)에서 유의한 차이가 나타났다. 결론 : 감각처리 유형과 학습유형, 학습전략 간에 상관관계가 나타났으며 감각처리 유형에 따라 학습유형, 학습전략이 달라짐으로 개인에게 맞는 학습 유형과 학습전략을 선택함에 있어 기초자료로써 활용되어지는데 의의가 있다.

Objective : The purpose of this study is to investigate correlation of sensory processing patterns, learning styles and learning strategies for university students. Methods : Participants of this study are 115 students from K university in Busan, South Korea. Measurements are Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile (AASP) for sensory processing patterns, the Study Process Questionnaire (SPQ) for learning styles, and the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) for learning strategies. The data collected was analyzed by SPSS/WIN 20.0 for chisuare test and Pearson corelation coefficient. Results : For sensory processing patterns and learning styles, there were correlation between low registration type and surface type of learning (p=0.03), and between sensory seeking type and deep type of learning (p=0.02). For sensory processing patterns and learning strategies, sensory seeking type was correlated with organized learning strategy (p=0.00), and sensory sensitivity type was correlated with organizational learning strategy (p=0.03) and meta-cognitive learning strategy (p=0.00). Conclusion : This study found that there is correlation between sensory processing patterns, learning styles and learning strategies with implying learning styles and learning strategies can be different depends on sensory procession pattern. The results of this study can be used as a basic data to select learning type and learning strategy appropriate for an individual based on his or her sensory processing patterns.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Alexander, P. A. (1998). The nature of disciplinary and domain learning: The knowledge, interest, and strategic dimensions of learning from subject-matter text. Learning from Text Across Conceptual Domains, 263-287.
  2. Ayres, A. J., & Robbins. J. (1979). Sensory integration and the child. Los Angeles, California: Western Psychological Services.
  3. Baranek, G. T., & Foster, L. G., & Berkson, G. (1997). Sensory defensiveness in persons with developmental disabilities. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 17(3), 173-185. https://doi.org/10.1177/153944929701700302
  4. Biggs, J. (1979). Individual differences in study processes and the quality of learning outcomes. Higher Education, 8(4), 381-394. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01680526
  5. Brown, C. E., & Dunn, W. (2002). Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile: user's manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
  6. Case-Smith, J., & Bryan, T. (1999). The effects of occupational therapy with sensory integration emphasis on preschool-age children with autism. American Journal Occupation Therapy, 53, 489-497. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.53.5.489
  7. Choi, H. S., & Jeon, J. S. (2011). A study on the effect of learning motivation and strategy on the students' learning satisfaction - focusing on the university students and the credit bank students. Business Education Study, 26(5), 27-50.
  8. Chung, Y. S., Kim, H. Y., & Kang, S. W. (2010). An exploratory study on the correlations of learning strategies, motivation, and academic achievement in adult learners. Journal of Educational Research, 8(2), 23-41.
  9. Dunn, W. (1997). The impact of sensory processing abilities on the daily lives of young children and their families: A conceptual model. Infants and Young Children, 9(4), 23-35. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001163-199704000-00005
  10. Entwistle, N., & Waterston, S., (1988). Approaches to studying and levels of processing in university students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58(3), 258-265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1988.tb00901.x
  11. Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity, Youth and crisis. New York, NY: Norton.
  12. Geiser, W. F., Dunn, R., Deckinger, E. L., Denig, S., Sklar, R. I., Beasley, M., et al. (2000). Effects of learning-style awareness and responsive study strategies on achievement, incidence of study, and attitudes of suburban eighth-grade students. National Forum of Special Education Journal, 9, 38-47.
  13. Hwang, J. H. (2007). The Relationship between university students' achievement goal orientations, learning strategies, and academic achievement, master's thesis, Yonsei university, Seoul.
  14. Jang, H. J., & Kim, M. A. (2014). Temperament by MBTI personality types, learning styles and learning strategies in nursing students. Journal of Contents, 14(9), 400-410.
  15. Jang, Y. S., Kim, H. D., Jeong, G. U., & Baek, J. Y. (2017). A lifecaretatinment based approach to investigating correlation between learning satisfaction and sensory processing in ADHD-prone university students. Journal of the Korea Entertainment Industry Association, 11(8), 297-304.
  16. Jeon, M. A. (2013). A relationship between self-directed learning readiness and learning style of university students majored in science and engineering. Journal of Korean Institute of Industrial Education, 38(2), 240-266.
  17. Jung, S. M., Choi, W. H., Lee, J. Y., Lee, S. A., & Kang, E. Y. (2017). The correlation of sensory processing type, school record and self-esteem in the college students. Journal of the Korea Entertainment Industry Association, 11(6), 247-253. https://doi.org/10.21184/jkeia.2017.08.11.6.247
  18. Kim, D. I., Shin, E. J., & Hwang, A. K. (2002). A meta-analysis of effects of learning strategy. Asian Journal of Education, 3(2), 71-93.
  19. Kim, J. K., Choi, J. D., & Lee, T. Y. (2007). Relationship between sensory processing styles and personality. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 15(3), 117-125.
  20. Kolb, D. A. (1985). Learning Style Inventory. Boston, MA: Hay/McBer.
  21. Lee, K. H., Lew, K. H., & Kim, E. K. (2014). Analysis of university students' learning competencies according to school year and academic discipline. Journal of the Korea Institute of Youth Facility and Environment, 12(3), 27-36.
  22. Park, C. H., Kim, K. H., Back, J. E., Kim, J. Y., O, K. H., Min, Y. J., et al. (2012). The correlation of sensory processing type, self-esteem and academic ability in the college students. Journal of Korean Academy of Sensory Integration, 10(2), 33-39.
  23. Park, H. S. (2000). The effect of study skills training program on study attitudes, achievement motivation and academic achievement of elementary school children, Doctoral dissertation, Busan university, Busan.
  24. Park, J. Y., & Kim, Y. S. (2005). Consumer decision-making styles as a function of individual learning styles of college students. Consumption culture study, 8(1), 247-269.
  25. Park, M. H., & Kim, K. M. (2006). The necessity for adult's sensory processing evaluating tool and the introduction of adolescent/adult sensory profile, Journal of Korean Academy of Sensory Integration, 4(1), 17-28.
  26. Park, M. J., & Choi, I. S. (2012). The effects of study skills training program on self-directed learning strategies of college students, CNU Journal of Educational Studies, 33(2), 1-30.
  27. Richardson, J. T. (1997). Meaning orientation and reproducing orientation: A typology of approaches to studying in higher education?. Educational Psychology, 17(3), 301-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341970170305
  28. Schutz, C. M., Gallagher, M. L., & Tepe, R. E. (2011). Differences in learning and study strategies inventory scores between chiropractic students with lower and higher grade point averages. Journal of Chiropractic Education, 25(1), 5-10. https://doi.org/10.7899/1042-5055-25.1.5
  29. Shin, J. I., Choi, Y. K., Chol, W. H., & Kim, K. M. (2008). The correlation between sensory integration function and scholar achievement in the lower classes children. Journal of Korean Academy of Sensory Integration, 6(1), 1-12.
  30. Shin, J. Y., & Choi, Y. Y. (2018). A validation study of the Korean version of academic work and meaning inventory (K-A-WAMI) for Korean college students. Korean Journal of School Psychology, 15(1), 1-26.
  31. Yang, M. H. (2000). The Study on the development and validation of self-regulated learning model, Doctoral dissertation, Seoul university, Seoul.
  32. Vermunt, J. D. (2005). Relations between student learning patterns and personal and contextual factors and academic performance. Higher Education, 49, 205-234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6664-2
  33. Yoon, H. K. (2012). The relations among the MBTI preferences, study types and learning strategies, Doctoral dissertation, Kookmin university, Seoul.
  34. Zhou, Y., Graham, L., & West, C. (2016). The relationship between study strategies and academic performance. International Journal of Medical Education, 7, 324-332. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.57dc.fe0f