DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

과학영재를 위한 연구윤리교육 및 윤리적 연구환경조성의 현황과 이에 대한 영재담당 교사들의 인식 조사

Current Status and Teachers' Perception About Research Ethics Education and Creating Ethical Research Environment for Gifted Students in Science

  • 투고 : 2018.11.20
  • 심사 : 2018.12.11
  • 발행 : 2018.12.31

초록

미래 과학자인 과학영재 학생들이 연구를 설계하고 수행하는 전과정에서 연구윤리를 어떻게 지키며 연구를 수행하여야 하는지에 대한 체계적이고 실질적인 교육이나 연구부정을 막기 위한 시스템적인 노력은 극히 최근에 시작되고 있지만 여전히 부족한 실정이다. 이 연구에서는 과학고와 영재고에 근무 중인 교사 68명을 대상으로 한국의 과학고와 영재고의 연구윤리교육과 윤리적 연구 환경 조성현황을 설문을 통해 알아보았다. 먼저 연구윤리교육현황을 살펴보면, 조사대상의 절반에 해당하는 학교가 연구윤리교육을 교육과정 내에 포함하고 있었다. 또, 반 이상의 교사가 수업 시간에 개인적으로 연구윤리를 가르친다고 응답하였고, 90%에 가까운 교사가 탐구 과정 중에 연구윤리를 가르친다고 응답하였다. 하지만 여전히 교사들은 연구윤리교육이 부족하다고 여기고 있었다. 다음으로, 연구윤리 준수를 위한 환경으로서, 연구윤리 규정과 시스템의 유무, 교사의 역량, 교사가 조성하는 동료검증, 자기검증 가능한 분위기, 연구윤리교육에 대한 관리자의 태도를 조사하였다. 지식과 경험 측면에서 교사는 역량을 갖추고 있었고, 동료, 자기 검증이 가능한 환경을 조성하고 있었다. 하지만 연구윤리규정과 검증 시스템은 학교에 충분히 갖추어져 있지 않다. 하지만 관리자들이 연구윤리교육에 대하여 높은 관심을 가지고 있으므로 충분히 개선될 것으로 보인다. 마지막으로, 교사들은 학생들의 윤리적 연구를 위해, 추가적인 연구윤리교육, 학생들의 태도 변화, 검증 시스템의 구축과 지속적 관리, 윤리적 환경조성, 명확한 지침 제공이 필요하다고 하였다. 이 결과는 각 영재학교에서 연구윤리교육 방향을 설정하는데 도움이 될 뿐 아니라, 영재 담당 교사들에게는 어떤 방식으로 학생들에게 도움을 줄지 계획하는데 도움이 될 것이다. 또한 과학영재 학생들을 둘러싸고 있는 외부적 환경을 학교와 교사가 어떻게 만들어나갈지에 대한 시사점을 얻을 수 있을 것이다.

In this study, we surveyed the 68 teachers from eight science high school and four science academy for the gifted through questionnaires about research ethics education and ethical research environment in Korea. First, we examined the current state of research ethics education. Half of the responding schools included research ethics education in their curriculum. Although only half of the schools have this in their curriculum, more than half of the total number of teachers surveyed personally taught research ethics in class, and almost 90% of the teachers said they taught the research ethics during students' research activity. However, 63.24% of teachers said that research ethics education was not enough still. Second, we investigated the ethical research environment. In terms of knowledge and experience, the teachers were competent, and they were creating an environment that enabled peers and self-verification. However, research ethics, regulations and verification systems are not well equipped in schools. Since the principals are highly interested in research ethics education, there seems to be enough improvement on the ethical research environment. Finally, teachers said that additional research ethics education, change in student attitude, development and continuous maintenance of the verification system, encouragement to develop ethical environment, and clear guidelines were needed for ethical research of students. The result of this research will be able to provide the following. First, it will help set up a direction for research ethics education at every gifted school. Second, it will provide insights on how schools and teachers can create an ethical research environment for the students of science-gifted students.

키워드

GHGOBX_2018_v38n6_853_f0001.png 이미지

Figure 1. Percentage of teachers who perform research ethics education in classes according to their years of teaching experience (Left: years of gifted education experiences, right: total years of education experiences)

GHGOBX_2018_v38n6_853_f0002.png 이미지

Figure 2. Percentage of teachers who perform research ethics education in classes according to their assigned subjects

GHGOBX_2018_v38n6_853_f0003.png 이미지

Figure 3. Percentage of teachers conducting research ethics education in the mentoring process (Left: years of gifted education experiences, right: total years of education experiences)

GHGOBX_2018_v38n6_853_f0004.png 이미지

Figure 4. Percentage of teachers conducting research ethics education in the mentoring process

GHGOBX_2018_v38n6_853_f0005.png 이미지

Figure 5. Teachers’ knowledge about research ethics and level of research experience

GHGOBX_2018_v38n6_853_f0006.png 이미지

Figure 6. Teachers’ Encouraging the development of atmosphere for peer- and self-verification

GHGOBX_2018_v38n6_853_f0007.png 이미지

Figure 7. Teachers’ impression on the principal's perception towards research ethics

Table 1. General characteristics of the teachers of gifted students who responded to the questionnaire

GHGOBX_2018_v38n6_853_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Questionnaire for teachers of gifted students

GHGOBX_2018_v38n6_853_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Current status of research ethics education in class

GHGOBX_2018_v38n6_853_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Current status of research ethics education conducted during mentoring process

GHGOBX_2018_v38n6_853_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5. Current status of having guideline for securing of research ethics

GHGOBX_2018_v38n6_853_t0005.png 이미지

Table 6. Current status of using plagiarism validation system

GHGOBX_2018_v38n6_853_t0006.png 이미지

참고문헌

  1. Anderson, E. E., Solomon, S., Heitman, E., DuBois, J. M., Fisher, C. B., Kost, R. G. & Ross, L. F. (2012). Research Ethics Education for Community-Engaged Research: A Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 7(2), 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2012.7.2.3
  2. Alexander, L. & Richman, K. (2008). Ethical Dilemmas in Evaluations Using Indigenous Research Workers. American Journal of Evaluation, 29(1), 73-85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214007313023
  3. Antes, A., Murphy, S., Waples, E., Mumford, M., Brown, R.,Connelly, S., & Devenport, L. (2009). A Meta-Analysis of Ethics Instruction Effectiveness in the Sciences. Ethics and Behavior, 19(5), 379-402. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508420903035380
  4. Baker, M. (2016). 1,500 Scientists Lift the Lid on Reproducibility. Nature News, 533(7604), 452. https://doi.org/10.1038/533452a
  5. Byeon, J. (2015, 21 Nov). Physicist & Literary Scholar Raised "Plagiarism" Suspicion to 'Gifted' Song Yu-Keun's Paper ['영재' 송유근 논문, 물리학자.문헌학자 "표절" 의혹 제기]. Dongascience, Retrieved from http://dongascience.donga.com/news/view/8769
  6. Chang, D. I. (2016). Causes of Occurrence and Categorization of Research Cheating -For Foundation of Research Ethics Education-. Institute for Humanities, 62, 131-163.
  7. Cho, E. H. (2006). Research Ethics Education in Science: How to get started [과학연구윤리교육: 어떻게 시작해야할까]. Science & Technology Policy, 16(1), 41-50.
  8. Chol, Y-S. (2007). A Study on Need and Direction of Research Ethics Education. The Korean Ethics Education Association, 13, 261-290.
  9. Choi, Y-S. (2013). The Study on the Relationship between Consciousness of Research Ethics of University Students and Moral Judgement. Journal of Ethics, 90, 257-282.
  10. Chol, Y-S. (2014). A Study on the Application and Evaluation of Research Ethics Education of University Students. The Korean Ethics Education Association, 33, 169-210.
  11. Fang, F. C., Steen, R. G., & Casadevall, A. (2012). Misconduct Accounts for the Majority of Retracted Scientific Publications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(42), 17028-17033. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212247109
  12. Flicker, S., Travers, R., Guta, A., McDonald, S., & Meagher, A. (2007). Ethical dilemmas in community-based participatory research: Recommendations for institutional review boards. Journal of Urban Health, 84(4), 478-493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-007-9165-7
  13. Kim, H-I. (2015). Development of Research Education Program. Journal of Ethics, 100, 131-149.
  14. Kim, H-S. (2007). The Structural Causes of Scientific Misconduct. Korean Association Of Science And Technology Studies, 7(2), 1-22.
  15. Kim, T. K.,& Jang, D-I. (2016). An Inquiry into the Research Cheating and Classification of Research Ethics Subject in the Research Rthics Rducation. The Korean Society for Moral & Ethics Education, 53, 1-20.
  16. Korean Ministry of Education (2015). Guideline for the Securing of Research Ethics. Retrieved from http://www.law.go.kr/admRulLsInfoP.do?admRulSeq=2100000031590.
  17. Kwak, J., Yan, J., & Han, I. 92016). A Study on the Effect of Web-based Research Ethics Education. The Journal of Korean association of computer education, 19(1), 1-10.
  18. Lee, I. J. (2015). Understanding Research Ethics and Ethical Practice. Dongmunsa, Seoul.
  19. Lee, J. A., & Yoo, M. H. (2013). Survey of Elementary and Middle School Gifted StudentsPerceptions on Research Ethics. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 23(4), 593-614. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2013.23.4.593
  20. Lee, J., Kim, J. B.,& Isozaki, T. (2017). A Comparative Study on Scientific Misconduct between Korean and Japanese Science Gifted Students. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3519-3538.
  21. Lee, J., Kim, J. B. (2015). The Survey of Gifted Students' Scientific Integrity and Perception of Scientific Misconduct in R&E Program. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education. 25(4), 565-580. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2015.25.4.565
  22. Lee, J. M. & Kim, J. E. (2015). The Framework for Educating Undergraduates on Research Ethics : Based on Kuhlthau's ISP Model. Journal of Women's Studies, 25, 203-219.
  23. Merritt, M., Labrique, A., Katz, J., Rashid, M., West, K., & Pettit, J. (2010). A Field Training Guide for Human Subjects Research Ethics. PLoS Medicine, 7(10), 1-4.
  24. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (2018). High School Education Guidelines [高等 學校學習指導要領]. Retrieved from http://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/ shotou/new-cs/1407074.htm
  25. National Academy of Sciences, N. A. (2009). On Being a Scientist: A Guide to Responsible Conduct in Research. National Academies Press (US).
  26. National Research Foundation. (2012). 2012 Survey and Analysis on Research Ethics Activities of Universities, Academic Societies, and National Research Institutes. Retrieved from http://www.nibp.kr/xe/info4_6/1540
  27. National Research Foundation. (2013). Study on Actual Condition of Ethical Research Activities in Korea (Policy Research-2013-028) [국내 연구윤리활동 실태 조사 연구 (정책연구-2013-028)]. Retrieved from http://www.nibp.kr/xe/info4_6/ 58569
  28. Resnik, D. B. (2005). The Ethics of Science: An Introduction. Routledge.
  29. Yun, E., & Park, Y. (2013). The Survey of Academic Integrity of the Student in Mentorship Program at a Science Gifted Institute Attached to University. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 23(2), 275-287. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2013.23.2.275
  30. Yune, S-J. Choi, Y-S, Choi, B-H & Ryang, S-S. (2011). A Study on The Realities and Alternative Direction of Plagiarism in the Research Ethics Education for University Students. Journal of Ethics Education Studies, 24, 315-335.

피인용 문헌

  1. A missing piece in high school science education: Research ethics in the classroom vol.43, pp.11, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1934602