Journal of Science Education (과학교육연구지)

Science Education Research Institute Kyungpook National University (경북대학교 과학교육연구소)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Differences in Science Achievement on the Concept of Photosynthesis According to Listening Styles and Learning Strategies

청취유형과 학습전략에 따른 광합성 개념의 과학성취도 차이 분석

  • Received : 2018.10.22
  • Accepted : 2018.11.18
  • Published : 2018.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The lecture is the main method of teaching, and the most common activity of students is 'listening.' Therefore, efficient and positive changes are expected if the researcher analyzes and uses students' listening styles to educate them. In addition, as the learner-centered education is emphasized, the learner's characteristics are becoming more important, and this flow increases the value of the listening styles of the student and that of the learning strategy, which is the student's self-directed learning. Therefore, this study examined whether there are differences in science achievement according to the listening styles and learning strategies by statistical analysis of the data obtained by conducting surveys for students in 5th, 7th, and 10th grades. The results of this study are as follows: First, students' listening styles and learning strategies show significant differences between men and women. Second, students' listening styles and learning strategies show significant differences between grade levels. Third, the level of task-oriented and critical listening types among listening styles produce meaningful differences in science achievement. Fourth, listening style, learning strategy, and science achievement have a significant correlation with each other. Finally, in terms of learning strategy-science achievement, it was shown that basic and complex cognitive strategy had a positive correlation with science achievement.

강의는 주된 수업 형태이며, 학생들의 가장 일반적인 활동은 청취이다. 따라서 학생들을 교육하기 위하여 청취유형을 분석한다면 효율적이고 긍정적인 변화가 기대된다. 뿐만 아니라 학습자 중심의 교육이 강조됨에 따라 학습자의 특성이 중요해지고, 자기 주도적 학습을 위해 학생들의 학습전략의 가치는 높아진다. 따라서 이 연구에서는 5, 7, 10학년 학생들을 대상으로 설문 조사를 통해 얻은 데이터를 통계 분석하여 청취유형과 학습전략에 따라 과학 성취도에 차이가 있는지를 조사하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 학생들의 청취유형과 학습전략이 성별 간에 큰 차이를 보인다. 둘째, 학생들의 청취유형과 학습전략은 학년별로 큰 차이를 보인다. 셋째, 청취유형 중 과제 중심 및 비판적 유형의 수준은 과학 성취도에 의미있는 영향을 미친다. 넷째, 청취유형, 학습전략 및 과학 성취도는 서로 유의미한 상관관계를 지닌다. 마지막으로 학습전략과 과학 성취의 측면에서 볼 때 기본적이고 복합인지 전략이 과학 성취와 양의 상관관계를 가진다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bae, M. (2007). An item development of the photosynthesis conception's questionnaires by using item response theory (Master's thesis). Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.
  2. Bodie, G. D., Worthington, D. L., & Gearhart, C. C. (2013). The listening styles profile-revised (LSP-R): A scale revision and evidence for validity. Communication quarterly, 61(1), 72-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2012.720343
  3. Brownell, J. (2010). The skills of listening-centered communication. In A. D. Wolvin (Ed.), Listening and human communication in the 21st century (pp. 141-157). Oxford, UK: Wiley Blackwell.
  4. Cho, K. (2011). The Effects of Nonverbal Communication of Teachers on Participation in Instruction and Academic Achievement Help. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 17(3), 261-282.
  5. Chung, Y., & Kang, K. (1998). Students' understanding of photosynthesis and an analysis of their misconceptions. Biology Education, 26(1), 1-7.
  6. Dailey, S. L. (2013). Let's take a trip: Exploring the effect of listening styles. Communication Teacher, 28(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2013.839046
  7. Dansereau, D. F. (1985). Learning strategy research. In J. W. Segal, S. F. Chipman, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and Learning Skills: Vol. 1. Relating Instruction to Research (pp. 209-239), Erlbaum, NJ: Hillsdale.
  8. Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. (2006). Self-discipline gives girls the edge: Gender in self-discipline, grades, and achievement test scores. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 198-208. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.198
  9. Han, J., & Hur, K. (2005). The relationships of family communication patterns and offsprings' self-esteem, self-disclosure, locus of control, and communication competence. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, 49(5), 202-227.
  10. Han, S. (2004). The relationships between the academic motivation variables, cognitive strategies and academic achievement. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 18(1), 329-350.
  11. Heo, H. (2011). An structural equation model analysis on secondary school students' achievement goal orientation, metacognition learning strategies and school achievement (Master's thesis). Ehwa Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
  12. Huh, K. (2010). Classification of lecturing behaviors for understanding. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 27(4), 97-120.
  13. Jang, H. (2013). The effects of self-disclosure and empathy on stress perception and stress coping strategy of university students. Korean Journal of Communication Studies, 21(3), 5-28.
  14. Jang, H., & Kang, T. (2005). The effects of speech education on the communication competence and apprehension. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, 49(1), 164-191.
  15. Jeon, S., & Park, J. (2014). Analysis of relationships of scientific communication skills, science process skills, logical thinking skills, and academic achievement level of elementary school students. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(7), 647-655. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.7.0647
  16. Jeong, H., & Han, Y. (2006). Effects of metacognitive learning strategy on elementary school students' conception acquisition of seasonal change and self-efficacy. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 25(1), 39-50.
  17. Johnston, M. K., Weaver, J. B., Watson K. W., & Barker, L. B. (2000). Listening styles: Biological or psychological differences? International Journal of Listening, 14(1), 32-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2000.10499034
  18. Kim, B., Kim, Y., Chung, W., & Lee, K. (2001). The relationship among academic volitional strategy learning strategy, and achievement in science classroom. Biology Education, 29(4), 300-308.
  19. Kim, H., & Cho, H. (2011). The educational productivity of level-based moving classes on improving the academic achievement of the middle school students. Productivity review, 25(2), 209-236. https://doi.org/10.15843/kpapr.25.2.201106.209
  20. Lim, H., & Hwang, M. (2012). An exploration of types of academic motivation, self-control, and the use of learning strategy among elementary school students: Using a latent class analysis. The Journal of Elementary Education, 25(3), 27-54.
  21. McKeachie, W. J. (1988). The need for study strategy training. In C. E. Weinstein, E. T. Goetz, & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Educational psychology. Learning and study strategies: Issues in assessment, instruction, and evaluation (pp. 3-9). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  22. Moon, K., & Kim, Y. (2008). Secondary school students' understanding and performance of experiments on photosynthesis and respiration. Biology Education, 36(4), 537-554. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2008.36.4.537
  23. O'Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  24. Park, S. (2016). A study on students' instructional preferences between problem-based learning and teacher-centered learning. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 16(9), 495-515.
  25. Pintrich, P. R., & Garcia, T. (1991). Student goal orientation and self-regulation in the college classroom. In M. L. Maehr, & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in Motivation and Achievement (pp. 371-402). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  26. Sperling, R. A., Howard, B. C., Miller, L. A., & Murphy, C. (2002). Measures of children's knowledge and regulation of cognition. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(1), 51-79. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2001.1091
  27. Vann, R., & Abraham, R. (1990). Strategies of unsuccessful learners'. TESOL Quarterly, 24, 177-198. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586898
  28. Watson, K. W., Barker, L. L., & Weaver III, J. B. (1995). The listening styles profile (LSP-16): Development and validation of an instrument to assess four listening styles. International Journal of Listening, 9(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.1995.10499138
  29. Weaver, J. B., Watson, K. W., & Barker, L. L. (1996). Individual differences in listening styles: Do you hear what I hear. Personality and Individual Differences, 20(3), 381-387. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(95)00194-8
  30. Yum, S., & Park, C. (2011). Mediating effect of learning strategy in the relation of mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics achievement: Latent growth model analyses. The Mathematics Education, 50(1), 103-118. https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2011.50.1.103
  31. Zimmerman, B., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 614-628. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312023004614