DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Self-congruity and Functional Congruity of Luxury Fashion Brands on Purchase Intentions: Focusing on Self-construal Moderation

럭셔리 패션 브랜드의 자아 일치성 및 기능 일치성이 구매의도에 미치는 영향: 자기해석 조절 효과를 중심으로

  • Seo, Jiin (Graduate School of Design, Kookmin University) ;
  • Lee, Eun-Jung (Dept. Fashion Design, Kookmin University)
  • 서지인 (국민대학교 디자인대학원) ;
  • 이은정 (국민대학교 의상디자인학과)
  • Received : 2018.01.05
  • Accepted : 2018.02.27
  • Published : 2018.02.28

Abstract

The global volume of luxury fashion industries has continuously grown with the influx of young consumers in 20s and 30s, yet little research explores luxury consumption patterns of the young consumers. Given the crucial importance of socio-psychological shopping values in luxury, the current study explores the effects of self-congruity and functional congruity on purchase intentions of luxury fashion brands, and the moderation of self-construal in the mechanisms. An online study was conducted through Google Forms with a total of 227 Korean respondents of actual luxury consumption experiences. The data was analyzed using SPSS 18.0 program. The results of the study reveal the following: (i) Among the three factors of self-congruity, ideal and social self-congruity factors have significant positive effects on purchase intentions; (ii) actual self-congruity has no statistical effect on purchase intnetions of luxury fashion brands; (iii) functional congruity has a significant positive effect on purchase intentions of luxury fashion brands; (iv) no moderation effect of self-construal was found in the relationships between the three factors of self-congruity and purchase intentions; (v) the moderation effect of independent self-construal is significant but negative in the relationship between functional congruity and purchase intentions; (vi) the effect of intdependent self-construal is not found to be significant in the relationship between functional congruity and purchase intentions. Managerial and theoretical implications are discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, K. H., & Lee, J. W. (2017). The influence of star brand image-consumer self congruence and star attributes on love for star brand and consumer happiness-Based on sports star brand. Advertisement Studies, 28(1), 151-175. doi:10.14377/KJA.2017.1.15.7
  2. Berger, J., & Ward, M. (2010). Subtle signals of inconspicuous consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(4), 555-569. doi:10.1086/655445
  3. Choi, J. A., Kim, J. J., & Hwang, J. H. (2015). The effect of social distance, self-construal, and need for uniqueness on Mimickee's emotional responses and repurchase intention. Korean Strategic Marketing Association, 23(2), 135-159.
  4. Choi, M. Y. (2011). The effect of new luxury fashion brand's product benefit on brand loyalty and brand commitment - Focus on dual path model by brand attitude and brand attachment. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing Industry, 13(5), 717-727. doi:10.5805/KSCI.2011.13.5.717
  5. Cross, S. E., Hardin, E. E., & Swing, B. G. (2011). The what, how, why, and where of self-construal. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(2), 142-179. doi:10.1177/1088868310373752
  6. Dubois, B., & Duquesne, P. (1993). The market for luxury goods: Income versus culture. European Journal of Marketing, 27(1), 35-44. doi:10.1108/03090569310024530
  7. Hahn, J. S. (2011). The effect of relevance between corporation and cause-related activity in cause-related ads on attitude. Unpublished master's thesis, Kwangwoon Univeristy, Seoul.
  8. Jang, J. S., Lee, J. H., & Ahn, K. H. (2011). The effect of the congruence between brand personality and self-image on purchase intention: The moderating role of self-monitoring and product type. The Korean Journal of Advertising, 22(5), 7-23.
  9. Jang, Y. J., & Moon, B. Y. (2015). The effect of outdoor fashion brand's perceived value on attitude, self-congruity, and repeat purchase intention. Sightseeing and Leisure Research, 27(10), 133-149.
  10. Johar, J. S., & Sirgy, M. S. (1991). Value-expressive utilitarian advertising appeals: When and why to use which appeal. Journal of Advertising, 20(3), 23-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1991.10673345
  11. Kang, J. Y., & Nam, G. Y. (2013). Effects of self-congruity and functional congruity on brand attitude and behavioral intention in using coffee shops. Korean Journal of Hotel Administration, 22(6), 237-283.
  12. Kim, H., & Kim, J. (2016). Influence of self-construal and self-monitoring on brand product preference: Focusing on the moderating effect of brand visibility. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 40(3), 539-553. doi:10.5850/JKSCT.2016.40.3.539
  13. Kim, S. J., & Wee, E. H. (2016). The effect of consumer's brand identification about luxury fashion brand on brand attachment: The moderating effect of self-monitoring and social self-esteem. Family and Environmental Research, 54(1), 97-106. doi:10.6115/fer.2016.008
  14. Kim, N. R. (2011). A study of effects of brand personality and self-congruity on brand attitude. Unpublished master's thesis, Hongik University, Seoul.
  15. Kim, S. H. (2014). Self-brand image congruity and functional congruity impacting brand love, brand attitude, and consumer reactions. Unpublished master's thesis, Kyungbook National University, Daegu.
  16. Kim, S. H., Lee, S. H., & Lim, T. S. (2014). The effect of self-brand image congruity and functional congruity on brand love, brand attitude and consumers' responses. Journal of Marketing Studies, 22(4), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2014.891872
  17. Kim, S. M., & Lee, B. K. (2015). A study on the effects of self-construal on preference for product assortment and variety seeking behavior. Korean Journal of Consumer and Advertising Psychology, 16(3), 499-518. https://doi.org/10.21074/kjlcap.2015.16.3.499
  18. Kim, Y. J., Song, S. Y., & Jang, J. H. (2007). The effect self-construal on product attitudes. Korea Marketing Review, 22(4), 157-173.
  19. Kim, T. H., Cho, E. Y., Lim, S. H., & Nam, J. S. (2013). A study on the influence of self-image and functional conformity on the satisfaction and reliability of customers. Journal of Hotel & Resort, 14(1), 19-40.
  20. Kotler, P. L., & Wingard, D. L. (1989). The effect of occupational, marital and parental roles on mortality: The alameda county study. American Journal of Public Health, 79(5), 607-612. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.79.5.607
  21. Kressmann, F., Sirgy, M. J., Herrmann, A., Huber, F., & Lee, D. J. (2006). Direct and indirect effects of congruence on brand loyalty. Journal of Business Research, 59(9), 955-964. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.06.001
  22. Kwon, M. T., & Choi, N. H. (2009). Effect of determinant factors of brand-self-congruity on brand loyalty: Focusing on the role of self-motivation. Journal of Consumer Studies, 20(2), 221-254.
  23. Lee, C. W. (2014). Relationships amng luxury brand's consumption value, brand-self-congruity, brand attachment, consumer happiness: Focusing on moderation of self-construal. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kyungbook National Univeristy, Daegu.
  24. Lee, D. W. (2009). A study on the influence of advertising awareness among consumers' personality traits on buying intention. Korean Association of Business Education, 54(1), 1-18.
  25. Lee, J. H. (2017). The structural relationship between brand consistency and intention to purchase luxury fashion products: With a focus on the mediating effect of self-construal. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, 18(7), 249-256. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2017.18.7.249
  26. Lee, Y. J., & Ra, S. A. (2002). Brand personality - brand identification - brand equity model: An exploratory study on the difference between users vs. non - users. Korea Marketing Review, 17(3), 1-32.
  27. Malar, L., Kromer, H., Hoyer, W. D., & Nyffenegger, B. (2011). Emotional brand attachment and brand personality: The relative importance of the actual and the ideal self. Journal of Marketing, 75(2), 35-52. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.75.4.35
  28. Markus, K., & Shinobu, K. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224-253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
  29. O'cass, A., & Forst, E. (2002). Status brands examining the effects of non-product-related brand associations on status and conspicuous consumption. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 11(2), 67-88. doi:10.1108/10610420210423455
  30. Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decision. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460-469. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150499
  31. Park, S. E. (2012). Effect of brand personality-self image consistency on brand loyalty: Focusing on modertions of product attitude and self monitorning. Unpublished master's thesis, Seongkyunkwan University, Seoul.
  32. Rhee, E. Y., & Chung, I. H. (2010). Research methodology of apparel studies. Seoul: Kyomoonsa.
  33. Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. New York: Basic Books.
  34. Shah, D. (2000). A new definition of luxury. Textile View, 52(1), 6-7.
  35. Shin, M. C. (2007). Basics of social science research methods. Seoul: Changminsa.
  36. Sirgy, M., Johar, J. S., Samli, A. C., & Claiborne, C. B. (1991). Self-congruity versus functional congruity: Predictors of consumer behavior. Journal of the Academy of Markerting Science, 19(4), 363-375. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02726512
  37. Sirgy, M. J. (1982). Self-concept in consumer behavior: A critical review. Journal of Consumer Reserch, 9(2), 287-300. https://doi.org/10.1086/208924
  38. Song, I. U. (2013). A study of effect of self-congruity of sportswear mother brand on attitude and purchase intention of extended brand. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kyunghee Univeristy, Seoul.
  39. Suh, M. J. (2012). Difference in brand fondness based on logo identity of fashion luxury: Focusing on moderations of self-construal and implicity theory. Unpublished master's thesis, Seungkyunkwan University, Seoul.
  40. Sung, Y. J., Choi, S. M., & Tinkham, S. F. (2012). Brand-situation congruity: The roles of self-construal and brand commitment. Psychology and Marketing, 29(12), 941-955. doi:10.1002/mar.20576
  41. Verhallen, T. M. M., & Robben, H. S. J. (1994). Scarcity and preference: An experiment on unavailability and product evaluation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 15(2), 315-331. doi:10.1016/0167-4870(94)90007-8
  42. Voyer, B. G., & Franks, B. (2014). Toward a better understanding of self-construal theory: An agency view of the processes of self-construal. Review of General Psychology, 18(2), 101-114. doi:10.1037/gpr0000003
  43. 'Young consumers rush in the department stores' luxury collections and high-end living shops'. (February 3, 2018). Herald Economy. Retrieved from http://heraldk.com/2018/02/03/%ED%86%B5%EC%BB%A4%EC%A7%84-2030-%E2%91%A1-%EB%B0%B1%ED%99%94%EC%A0%90-%EB%AA%85%ED%92%88%EB%8C%80%EC%A0%84%E3%86%8D%EA%B3%A0%EA%B8%89-%EB%A6%AC%EB%B9%99%EC%83%B5%EB%8F%84-%EC%A0%8A%EC%9D%80/
  44. Yu, S. K., & Kim, K. B. (2012). The effects of actual and ideal selfcongruence on brand loyalty: The mediating role of brand attitude and emotional brand attachment. Business Management Studies, 19(4), 283-303.
  45. Zhang, Y., & Gelb, B. (1996). Matching advertising appeals to culture: The influence of products' use conditions. Journal of Advertising, 25, 29-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1996.10673505