KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems (TIIS)

Korean Society for Internet Information (한국인터넷정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Hybrid Software Defined Networking Architecture for Next-Generation IoTs

  • Lee, Ahyoung (Department of Computer Science, University of South Dakota) ;
  • Wang, Xuan (Department of Computer Science, University of South Dakota) ;
  • Nguyen, Hieu (Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Colorado Denver) ;
  • Ra, Ilkyeun (Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Colorado Denver)
  • Received : 2017.10.05
  • Accepted : 2017.12.28
  • Published : 2018.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Everything in the world is becoming connected and interactive due to the Internet. The future of interactive smart environments such as smart cities, smart industries, or smart farms demand high network bandwidth, high network flexibility, and self-organization systems without costly hardware upgrades, and they provide a sustainable, scalable, and replicable smart environment backbone infrastructure. This paper presents a new Hybrid Software-Defined architecture for integrating Internet-of-Things technologies that are essential technologies for smart environments. It combines a software-defined networking infrastructure and a real-time distributed network framework with an advanced optimization to enable self-configuration, self-management, and self-adaption for providing seamless communication and efficiently managing a vast number of smart heterogeneous devices.

Keywords

References

  1. Evans, Dave. "The Internet of Things How the Next Evolution of the Internet is Changing Everything (April 2011)," White Paper by Cisco Internet Business Solutions Group (IBSG), 2012.
  2. Jain, S., Kumar, A., Mandal, S., Ong, J., Poutievski, L., Singh, A., Venkata, S., Wanderer, J., Zhou, J., Zhu, M. and Zolla, J. "B4: Experience with a globally-deployed software defined WAN," ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, vol. 43, no. 4, pp.3-14, 2013.
  3. Akyildiz, I.F., Wang, P. and Lin, S.C. "SoftWater: Software-defined networking for next-generation underwater communication systems," Ad Hoc Networks, 46, pp.1-11, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2016.02.016
  4. Hassas Yeganeh, S. and Ganjali, Y. "Kandoo: a framework for efficient and scalable offloading of control applications," in Proc. of Proceedings of the first workshop on Hot topics in software defined networks, pp. 19-24. ACM, August 2012.
  5. Dixit, A., Hao, F., Mukherjee, S., Lakshman, T.V. and Kompella, R.. "Towards an elastic distributed SDN controller," in Proc. of ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, Vol. 43, No. 4, pp. 7-12. ACM, August 2013.
  6. Fu, Y., Bi, J., Chen, Z., Gao, K., Zhang, B., Chen, G. and Wu, J. "A hybrid hierarchical control plane for flow-based large-scale software-defined networks," IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, vol. 12, no. 2, pp.117-131, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSM.2015.2434612
  7. Lu, Hui, Nipun Arora, Hui Zhang, Cristian Lumezanu, Junghwan Rhee, and Guofei Jiang. "Hybnet: Network manager for a hybrid network infrastructure," in Proc. of Proceedings of the Industrial Track of the 13th ACM/IFIP/USENIX International Middleware Conference, p. 6. ACM, 2013.
  8. Stringer, J., Pemberton, D., Fu, Q., Lorier, C., Nelson, R., Bailey, J., Correa, C.N. and Rothenberg, C.E. "Cardigan: Sdn distributed routing fabric going live at an internet exchange," in Proc. of Computers and Communication (ISCC), 2014 IEEE Symposium on (pp. 1-7), June 2014.
  9. Rothenberg, C.E., Nascimento, M.R., Salvador, M.R., Correa, C.N.A., Cunha de Lucena, S. and Raszuk, R. "Revisiting routing control platforms with the eyes and muscles of software-defined networking," in Proc. of Proceedings of the first workshop on Hot topics in software defined networks, pp. 13-18, August 2012.
  10. Salsano, S., Ventre, P.L., Lombardo, F., Siracusano, G., Gerola, M., Salvadori, E., Santuari, M., Campanella, M. and Prete, L. "Hybrid IP/SDN networking: open implementation and experiment management tools," IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, vol. 13, no. 1, pp.138-153, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSM.2015.2507622
  11. Akyildiz, I.F., Lee, A., Wang, P., Luo, M. and Chou, W. "A roadmap for traffic engineering in SDN-OpenFlow networks," Computer Networks, 71, pp.1-30, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2014.06.002
  12. Vissicchio, S., Vanbever, L. and Bonaventure, O. "Opportunities and research challenges of hybrid software defined networks," ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, vol. 44, no. 2, pp.70-75, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1145/2602204.2602216
  13. De Oliveira, R.L.S., Shinoda, A.A., Schweitzer, C.M. and Prete, L.R. "Using mininet for emulation and prototyping software-defined networks," in Proc. of Communications and Computing (COLCOM), 2014 IEEE Colombian Conference on, pp. 1-6, June 2014.
  14. Floodlight, P. "Project floodlight open source software for building software defined networks," 2012.
  15. Orlowski, S., Wessaly, R., Pioro, M. and Tomaszewski, A. "SNDlib 1.0-Survivable network design library," Networks, vol. 55, no. 3, pp.276-286, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1002/net.20371
  16. Zhang, J., Xi, K., Luo, M. and Chao, H.J. "Load balancing for multiple traffic matrices using SDN hybrid routing," in Proc. of High Performance Switching and Routing (HPSR), 2014 IEEE 15th International Conference on, pp. 44-49, July 2014.
  17. De Maesschalck, S., Colle, D., Lievens, I., Pickavet, M., Demeester, P., Mauz, C., Jaeger, M., Inkret, R., Mikac, B. and Derkacz, J. "Pan-European optical transport networks: an availability-based comparison," Photonic Network Communications, vol. 5, no. 3, pp.203-225, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023088418684