Journal of Korea Society of Digital Industry and Information Management (디지털산업정보학회논문지)

Korea Society of Digital Industry and Information Management (디지털산업정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Organization Performance Reinforcement by a Utilization Level of the Smart Work

스마트워크 활용 수준에 따른 조직성과 강화에 관한 연구

  • 정병호 (경남대학교 글로벌프로젝트매니지먼트)
  • Received : 2018.10.30
  • Accepted : 2018.11.16
  • Published : 2018.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine an organizational performance difference by individual utilization level of the smart work. The Smart work help minimizing business process and improving organization productivity based on information technology. This new technology provides a flexible way of the task through smart-work center, videoconferencing, telecommuting, mobile(remote control) and business-only messenger. This investment changes organizational culture, institutions and behavior by new technology applying. The organization system change due to smart work has trouble between alteration preferences and existing maintains a group. In response, the organization should make investment justification of smart work for institutional and culture stabilized by a new system in organization. I set up the analytical process of four stages for empirical research. It will analyze an operation difference of the smart work between pre and post investment in the first-step analysis. The two-step analysis will conduct a text mining analysis of smart work operations. The three-step analysis will identify organization performance differences among individual levels in smart work. The four-step analysis will identify a factor difference in organizational performance by individual utilization level on smart work. According to the study, It has been revealed a difference between the pre and post investment performance on smart work. The text mining analyses many appeared an improvement opinion of organizational culture. Next, there is a difference in organization performance among utilize groups of smart work. Furthermore, the factors of organizational performance among groups appeared differently. The theoretical contribution of this study provided to expand the organizational theory of organization change and resistance. The practical implications provided to require a strong guideline an organizational culture and institution for smart work.

Keywords

References

  1. Laudon, Kenneth C., and Jane P. Laudon. Management information system, Pearson Education India, 2016.
  2. Turban, Efraim, et al. Electronic commerce 2018: a managerial and social networks perspective, Springer, 2017.
  3. 성욱준, "공공 부문 스마트워크 정책 수용 요인에 대한 연구 - 스마트워크센터 사용자 인식조사를 중심으로," 한국정책학회보 제2권, 제1호, 2013, pp. 331-359.
  4. 안경섭, "중앙정부의 스마트워크 적용 가능성에 대한 영향요인 비교 분석: 고용노동부와 국세청 사례의 비교를 중심으로," 정부학연구, 제23권, 제2호, 2017, pp. 169-188.
  5. 정병호.김병초, "중소기업의 IT 투자에 따른 정보품질과 프로세스 개선에 관한 연구," 중소기업연구, 제36권, 제4호, 2014, pp. 47-71.
  6. 정병호.김병초, "IT 프로젝트 모방 투자 유형에 따른 성과 차이 연구," 한국IT서비스학회지, 제11권, 제3호, 2012, pp. 205-225. https://doi.org/10.9716/KITS.2012.11.3.205
  7. 정병호, "스마트워크 투자에 따른 직무 생산성에 관한 연구 : 조직 변화저항과 의사소통을 중심으로," 경영과 정보연구, 제37권, 제3호, 2018, pp. 83-113.
  8. 한국정보화진흥원, 일하는 방식의 대혁명적 변화 스마트워크, 2010.
  9. Galbraith, Jay R. Organization design, Addison Wesley Publishing Company, 1977.
  10. Slocum, John W. and Don Hellriegel, Principles of organizational behavior, South-Western Cengage Learning, 2009.
  11. Robbins, S. P. and Judge, T., Essentials of organizational behavior, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2012.
  12. Robbins, S. P., Coulter, M., and De Cenzo, D., Fundamentals of Management: Global Edition, Pearson Education Limited, 2014.
  13. 신철우.박하진.장수덕.최병우, 조직 행동론, 서울:문영사, 2009.
  14. Lewin Kurt, Field theory in social science, 1951.
  15. Lawrence Paul R., How to deal with resistance to change, Harvard Business Review, 1969.
  16. Jones, G. R., George, J. M. and Langton., Essentials of contemporary anagement, McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2013.
  17. Bharadwaj Anandhi S., "A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: an empirical investigation," MIS quarterly, Vol.24, No.1, 2000, pp. 169-196. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250983
  18. 최재영, "IT 투자 정당화 요인에 관한 연구," 디지털정보산업학회지, 제11권, 제4호, 2015, pp. 177-187.
  19. Hoque, F., Sambamurthy, V., Zmud, R., Trainer, T. and Wilson, C. Winning the 3-legged race: When business and technology run together, Prentice-Hall Inc., 2005.
  20. De Dreu, Carsten KW, Bernard A. Nijstad, and Daan van Knippenberg. "Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making," Personality and social psychology review, Vol.12, No.1, 2008, pp. 22-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868307304092
  21. 정병호, "기밀정보 유출 경험을 가진 기업들의 정보사고 대응역량 강화에 관한 연구," 디지털정보산업학회지, 제12권, 제2호, 2016, pp. 73-86.
  22. 이정환.정병호.김병초, "기업 보안 유형에 따른 보안사고 대응역량: 사회기술시스템 이론 관점에서," 한국IT서비스학회지, 제12권, 제1호, 2013, pp. 289-208. https://doi.org/10.9716/KITS.2013.12.1.289
  23. O'Reilly III, C. A., Chatman, J. and Caldwell, D. F., "People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person organization fit," Academy of management journal, Vol.34, No.3, 1991, pp. 487-516. https://doi.org/10.2307/256404
  24. Dewett, T. and Jones, G. R., "The role of information technology in the organization: a review, model, and assessment," Journal of management, Vol.27, No.3, 2001, pp. 313-346. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630102700306
  25. Hair, Joseph F., Multivariate data analysis, 2010.

Cited by

  1. 조직 내 4차 산업혁명의 기술 적용에 관한 연구 vol.16, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.17662/ksdim.2020.16.4.095