Steel and Composite Structures

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Numerical study of the cyclic behavior of steel plate shear wall systems (SPSWs) with differently shaped openings

  • Ali, Mustafa M. (Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM)) ;
  • Osman, S.A. (Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM)) ;
  • Husam, O.A. (Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM)) ;
  • Al-Zand, Ahmed W. (Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM))
  • Received : 2016.01.30
  • Accepted : 2017.12.02
  • Published : 2018.02.10
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper presents the development of finite element (FE) models to simulate the behavior of diagonally stiffened steel plate shear wall systems (SPSWs) with differently shaped openings subjected to a cyclic load. This walling system has the potential to be used for shear elements that resist lateral loads in steel-framed buildings. A number of $\text\tiny{^1/_2}$-scale one-story buildings that were un-stiffened, stiffened and stiffened with opening SPSWs are modeled and simulated using the finite element method based on experimental data from previous research. After validating the finite element (FE) models, the effects of infill plate thickness on the cyclic behavior of steel shear walls are investigated. Furthermore, triple diagonal stiffeners are added to the steel infill plates of the SPSWs, and the effects are studied. Moreover, the effects of a number of differently shaped openings applied to the infill plate are studied. The results indicate that the bearing capacity and shear resistance are affected positively by increasing the infill plate thickness and by adding triple diagonal stiffeners. In addition, the cyclic behavior of SPSWs is improved, even with an opening in the SPSWs.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

References

  1. AISC (2010), Specification for StructuralSteel Buildings; Chicago, IL, USA.
  2. Alavi, E. and Nateghi, F. (2012), "Experimental study of diagonally stiffened steel plate shear walls", J. Struct. Eng., 139(11), 1795-1811.
  3. Alavi, E. and Nateghi, F. (2013), "Experimental study on diagonally stiffened steel plate shear walls with central perforation", J. Constr. Steel Res., 89, 9-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.06.005
  4. Barkhordari, M., Asghar Hosseinzadeh, S. and Seddighim M. (2014), "Behavior of steel plate shear walls with stiffened full-height rectangular openings", Asian J. Civil Eng. (BHRC), 15, 741-759.
  5. Bruneau, M., Uang, C.-M. and Sabelli, S.R. (2011), Ductile Design of Steel Structures, McGraw Hill Professional.
  6. Chatterjee, A.K., Bhowmick, A. and Bagchi, A. (2015), "Development of a simplified equivalent braced frame model for steel plate shear wall systems", Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J., 18(3), 711-737. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2015.18.3.711
  7. Chen, S.-J. and Jhang, C. (2011), "Experimental study of low-yield-point steel plate shear wall under in-plane load", J. Constr. Steel Res., 67(6), 977-985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.01.011
  8. Feizi, M.G., Mojtahedi, A. and Nourani, V. (2015), "Effect of semi-rigid connections in improvement of seismic performance of steel moment-resisting frames", Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J., 19(2), 467-484. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2015.19.2.467
  9. Guo, Y., Zhou, M., Dong, Q. and Wang, X. (2011), "Experimental study on three types of steel plate shear walls under cyclic loading", Jianzhu Jiegou Xuebao (J. Build. Struct.), 32(1), 17-29.
  10. Hibbitt, K. and Sorensen (2002), ABAQUS/CAE User's Manual: Hibbitt, Karlsson & Sorensen, Incorporated.
  11. Hilo, S.J., Badaruzzaman, W.W., Osman, S.A., Al-Zand, A.W., Samir, M. and Hasan, Q.A. (2015), "A state-of-the-art review on double-skinned composite wall systems", Thin-Wall. Struct., 97, 74-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2015.09.007
  12. Hosseinzadeh, S. and Tehranizadeh, M. (2012), "Introduction of stiffened large rectangular openings in steel plate shear walls", J. Constr. Steel Res., 77, 180-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.05.010
  13. Kalali, H., Hajsadeghi, M., Zirakian, T. and Alaee, F.J. (2015), "Hysteretic performance of SPSWs with trapezoidally horizontal corrugated web-plates", Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J., 19(2), 277-292. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2015.19.2.277
  14. Krawinkler, H. (1992), Guidelines for cyclic seismic testing of components of steel structures, Applied Technology Council.
  15. Standard ASTM E8/E8M (2009), Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials; ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA. DOI: 10.1520. E0008-E0008M-09
  16. Vatansever, C. and Yardimci, N. (2011), "Experimental investigation of thin steel plate shear walls with different infill-to-boundary frame connections", Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J., 11(3), 251-271. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2011.11.3.251
  17. Wang, M., Yang, W., Shi, Y. and Xu, J. (2015), "Seismic behaviors of steel plate shear wall structures with construction details and materials", J. Constr. Steel Res., 107, 194-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.01.007
  18. Wong, M.Y., Shanmugam, N.E. and Osman, S.A. (2010), "Free vibration characteristics of horizontally curved composite plate girder bridges", Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J., 10(4), 297-315. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2010.10.4.297

Cited by

  1. Behavior of FRP-reinforced steel plate shear walls with various reinforcement designs vol.33, pp.5, 2019, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2019.33.5.729
  2. Hysteretic characteristics of steel plate shear walls: Effects of openings vol.76, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2020.76.6.687
  3. Investigation of performance of steel plate shear walls with partial plate-column connection (SPSW-PC) vol.39, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2021.39.1.109