Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society

The Korean Neurosurgical Society (대한신경외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Additional Surgical Method Aimed to Increase Distractive Force during Occipitocervical Stabilization : Technical Note

  • Antar, Veysel (Department of Neurosurgery, Istanbul Research and Training Hospital) ;
  • Turk, Okan (Department of Neurosurgery, Istanbul Research and Training Hospital)
  • Received : 2017.06.24
  • Accepted : 2017.08.23
  • Published : 2018.03.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective : Craniovertebral junctional anomalies constitute a technical challenge. Surgical opening of atlantoaxial joint region is a complex procedure especially in patients with nuchal deformity like basilar invagination. This region has actually very complicated anatomical and functional characteristics, including multiple joints providing extension, flexion, and wide rotation. In fact, it is also a bottleneck region where bones, neural structures, and blood vessels are located. Stabilization surgery regarding this region should consider the fact that the area exposes excessive and life-long stress due to complex movements and human posture. Therefore, all options should be considered for surgical stabilization, and they could be interchanged during the surgery, if required. Methods : A 53-year-old male patient applied to outpatients' clinic with complaints of head and neck pain persisting for a long time. Physical examination was normal except increased deep tendon reflexes. The patient was on long-term corticosteroid due to an allergic disease. Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography findings indicated basilar invagination and atlantoaxial dislocation.The patient underwent C0-C3-C4 (lateral mass) and additional C0-C2 (translaminar) stabilization surgery. Results : In routine practice, the sites where rods are bound to occipital plates were placed as paramedian. Instead, we inserted lateral mass screw to the sites where occipital screws were inserted on the occipital plate, thereby creating a site where extra rod could be bound.When C2 translaminar screw is inserted, screw caps remain on the median plane, which makes them difficult to bind to contralateral system. These bind directly to occipital plate without any connection from this region to the contralateral system.Advantages of this technique include easy insertion of C2 translaminar screws, presence of increased screw sizes, and exclusion of pullout forces onto the screw from neck movements. Another advantage of the technique is the median placement of the rod; i.e., thick part of the occipital bone is in alignment with axial loading. Conclusion : We believe that this technique, which could be easily performed as adjuvant to classical stabilization surgery with no need for special screw and rod, may improve distraction force in patients with low bone density.

Keywords

References

  1. Brooks AL, Jenkins EB : Atlanto-axial arthrodesis by the wedge compression method. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60 : 279-284, 1978 https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-197860030-00001
  2. Dickman CA, Sonntag VK, Papadopoulos SM, Hadley MN : The interspinous method of posterior atlantoaxial arthrodesis. J Neurosurg 74 : 190-198, 1991 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1991.74.2.0190
  3. Du S, Ni B, Lu X, Xie N, Guo X, Guo Q, et al. : Application of unilateral C2 translaminar screw in the treatment for atlantoaxial iInstability as an alternative or salvage of pedicle screw fixation. World Neurosurg 97 : 86-92, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.09.090
  4. Haher TR, Yeung AW, Caruso SA, Merola AA, Shin T, Zipnick RI, et al. : Occipital screw pullout strength. A biomechanical investigation of occipital morphology. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24 : 5-9, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199901010-00003
  5. Harms J, Melcher RP : Posterior C1-C2 fusion with polyaxial screw and rod fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26 : 2467-2471, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200111150-00014
  6. Gallie WE : Fractures and dislocations of the cervical spine. Am J Surg 46 : 495-499, 1939. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(39)90309-0
  7. Goel A, Laheri V : Plate and screw fixation for atlanto-axial subluxation. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 129 : 47-53, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01400872
  8. Goel A : Is inclusion of the occipital bone necessary/counter-effective for craniovertebral junction stabilization? J Craniovertebr Junction Spine 6 : 102-104, 2015 https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-8237.161588
  9. Goel A, Jankharia B, Shah A, Sathe P : Three-dimensional models: an emerging investigational revolution for craniovertebral junction surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 25 : 740-744, 2016 https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.4.SPINE151268
  10. Gorek J, Acaroglu E, Berven S, Yousef A, Puttlitz CM : Constructs incorporating intralaminar C2 screws provide rigid stability for atlantoaxial fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30 : 1513-1518, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000167827.84020.49
  11. Lee MJ, Cassinelli E, Riew KD : The feasibility of inserting atlas lateral mass screws via the posterior arch. Spine Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31 : 2798- 2801, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000245902.93084.12
  12. Magerl F, Seeman PS : Stable posterior fusion of the atlas and axis by transarticular screw fixation in Kehr P, Weider A (eds) : Cervical Spine I. Vienna : Spinger, 1987, pp322-327
  13. Marcotte P, Dickman CA, Sonntag VK, Karahalios DG, Drabier J : Posterior atlantoaxial facet screw fixation. J Neurosurg 79 : 234-237, 1993 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1993.79.2.0234
  14. Mendelsohn D, Dea N, Lee R, Boyd MC : Bilateral pedicle and crossed translaminar screws in C2. Asian Spine J 9 : 783-788, 2015 https://doi.org/10.4184/asj.2015.9.5.783
  15. Menezes AH : Dorsal occipitocervical fusion: rod and wiring techniques in Kim DM, Vaccaro AR, Fessler RG (eds) : Spinal Instrumentation: Surgical Techniques. New York : Thieme Medical Publishers, 2005, pp14-19
  16. Ransford AO, Crockard HA, Pozo JL, Thomas NP, Nelson IW : Craniocervical instability treated by contoured loop fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 68 : 173-177, 1986
  17. Takayasu M, Aoyama M, Joko M, Takeuchi M : Surgical Intervention for instability of the craniovertebral junction. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 56 : 465-475, 2016 https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.ra.2015-0342
  18. Tan M, Wang H, Wang Y, Zhang G, Yi P, Li Z, et al. : Morphometric evaluation of screw fixation in atlas via posterior arch and lateral mass. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28 : 888-895, 2003
  19. Wright NM : Posterior C2 fixation using bilateral, crossing C2 laminar screws: case series and technical note. J Spinal Disord Tech 17 : 158-162, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1097/00024720-200404000-00014
  20. Yew A, Lu D, Lu DC : CT-based morphometric analysis of C1 laminar dimensions: C1 translaminar screw fixation is a feasible technique for salvage of atlantoaxial fusions. Surg Neurol Int 6(Suppl 4) : S236-S239, 2015 https://doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.156603

Cited by

  1. Determination of Normal Values of the Basal Angle in the Era of Magnetic Resonance Imaging vol.132, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.09.056
  2. Should we recommend occipital plate fixation using bicortical screws or inverted occipital hooks to optimize occipito-cervical junction fusion? A biomechanical study combining an experimental and anal vol.80, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2020.105173