DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Morphological Characteristics of the Subaxial Cervical Spine between Athetoid Cerebral Palsy and Normal Control

  • Kim, Jun Young (Department of Neurosurgery, Wiltse Memorial Hospital) ;
  • Kwon, Jae Yeol (Department of Neurosurgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Kim, Moon Seok (Department of Neurosurgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Lee, Jeong Jae (Department of Neurosurgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Kim, Il Sup (Department of Neurosurgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Hong, Jae Taek (Department of Neurosurgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea)
  • Received : 2017.03.31
  • Accepted : 2017.08.13
  • Published : 2018.03.01

Abstract

Objective : To compare the morphometry of subaxial cervical spine between cerebral palsy (CP) and normal control. Methods : We retrospectively analyzed 72 patients with CP, as well as 72 patients from normal population. The two groups were matched for age, sex, and body mass index. Pedicle, lateral mass (LM), and vertebral foramen were evaluated using computed tomography (CT) imaging. Pedicle diameter, LM height, thickness, width and vertebral foramen asymmetry (VFA) were measured and compared between the two groups. Cervical dynamic motion, disc and facet joint degeneration were investigated. Additionally, we compared the morphology of LM between convex side and concave side with cervical scoliotic CP patients. Results : LM height was smaller in CP group. LM thickness and width were larger in CP group at mid-cervical level. In 40 CP patients with cervical scoliosis, there were no height and width differences between convex and concave side. Pedicle outer diameter was not statistically different between two groups. Pedicle inner diameter was significantly smaller in CP group. Pedicle sclerosis was more frequent in CP patients. VFA was larger in CP group at C3, C4, and C5. Disc/facet degeneration grade was higher in the CP group. Cervical motion of CP group was smaller than those of the control group. Conclusion : LM morphology of CP patients was different from normal population. Sclerotic pedicles and vertebral foramen asymmetry were more commonly identified in CP patients. CP patients were more likely to demonstrate progressive disc/facet degeneration. This data may provide useful information on cervical posterior instrumentation in CP patients.

Keywords

References

  1. Anderson PA, Henley MB, Grady MS, Montesano PX, Winn HR : Posterior cervical arthrodesis with AO reconstruction plates and bone graft. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 16(3 Suppl) : S72-S79, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199103001-00012
  2. Anderson WW, Wise BL, Itabashi HH, Jones M : Cervical spondylosis in patients with athetosis. Neurology 12 : 410-412, 1962 https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.12.6.410
  3. Ebraheim NA, Hoeflinger MJ, Salpietro B, Chung SY, Jackson WT : Anatomic considerations in posterior plating of the cervical spine. J Orthop Trauma 5 : 196-199, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-199105020-00013
  4. Furuya T, Yamazaki M, Okawa A , Misawa S, Sakuma T, Takahashi H, et al. : Cervical myelopathy in patients with athetoid cerebral palsy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38 : E151-E157, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31827bc7e8
  5. Harada T, Ebara S, Anwar MM, Okawa A, Kajiura I, Hiroshima K, et al. : The cervical spine in athetoid cerebral palsy. A radiological study of 180 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78 : 613-619, 1996
  6. Henry GC : Advances in cerebral palsy. Curr Opin Ortho 13 : 424-431, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1097/00001433-200212000-00007
  7. Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, Jones PK, Bohlman HH : Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81 : 519-528, 1999 https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199904000-00009
  8. Jeanneret B, Magerl F, Ward EH, Ward JC : Posterior stabilization of the cervical spine with hook plates. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 16(3 Suppl) : S56-S63, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199103001-00010
  9. Kato S, Shoda N, Chikuda H, Seichi A, Takeshita K : Morphological characteristics of cervical spine in patients with athetoid cerebral palsy and the accuracy of pedicle screw placement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39 : E508-E513, 2014 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000234
  10. Kidron D, Steiner I, Melamed E : Late-onset progressive radiculomyelopathy in patients with cervical athetoid-dystonic cerebral palsy. Eur Neurol 27 : 164-166, 1987 https://doi.org/10.1159/000116150
  11. Kim SW, Limson MA, Kim SB, Arbatin JJ, Chang KY, Park MS, et al. : Comparison of radiographic changes after ACDF versus Bryan disc arthroplasty in single and bi-level cases. Eur Spine J 18 : 218-231, 2009 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0854-z
  12. Ko HY, Park-Ko I : Spinal cord injury secondary to cervical disc herniation in ambulatory patients with cerebral palsy. Spinal Cord 36 : 288-292, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3100607
  13. Lee YJ, Chung DS, Kim JT, Bong HJ, Han YM, Park YS : Surgical treatments for cervical spondylotic myelopathy associated with athetoid cerebral palsy. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 43 : 294-299, 2008 https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2008.43.6.294
  14. Misawa H , Tanaka M , Nakahara S : Therapeutics and a consideration of failed neck surgery in cervical spondylotic myelopathy complicating athetoid cerebral palsy. Spine Spinal Cord 22 : 745-753, 2009
  15. Nakashima H, Yukawa Y, Imagama S, Kanemura T, Kamiya M, Yanase M, et al. : Complications of cervical pedicle screw fixation for nontraumatic lesions: a multicenter study of 84 patients. J Neurosurg Spine 16 : 238-247, 2012 https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.11.SPINE11102
  16. Nazarian SM, Louis RP : Posterior internal fixation with screw plates in traumatic lesions of the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 16(3 Suppl) : S64-S71, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199103001-00011
  17. Onari K, Kondo S, Mihara H, Iwamura Y : Combined anterior-posterior fusion for cervical spondylotic myelopathy in patients with athetoid cerebral palsy. J Neurosurg 97(1 Suppl) : S13-S19, 2002
  18. Onibokun A, Khoo LT, Bistazzoni S, Chen NF, Sassi M : Anatomical considerations for cervical pedicle screw insertion: the use of multiplanar computerized tomography measurements in 122 consecutive clinical cases. Spine J 9 : 729-734, 2009 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2009.04.021
  19. Park MS, Lee YB, Moon SH, lee HM, Kim TH, Oh JB, et al. : Facet joint degeneration of the cervical spine: a computed tomographic analysis of 320 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39 : E713-E718, 2014 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000326
  20. Phillips FM, Phillips CS, Wetzel FT, Gelinas C : Occipitocervical neutral position. Possible surgical implications. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24 : 775-778, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199904150-00008
  21. Roy-Camille R, Saillant G, Mazel C : Internal fixation of the unstable cervical spine by a posterior osteosynthesis with plates and screws, ed 2. Philadelphia : JB Lippincott, 1989
  22. Wong AS, Massicotte EM, Fehlings MG : Surgical treatment of cervical myeloradiculopathy associated with movement disorders: indications, technique, and clinical outcome. J Spinal Disord Tech 18 : S107-S114, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bsd.0000128693.44276.86

Cited by

  1. What is the best treatment option for cervical spinal cord injury by os odontoideum in a patient with athetoid dystonic cerebral palsy? vol.44, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2019.1706289