DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Outcomes of Pulmonary Resection and Mediastinal Node Dissection by Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy for Stage IIIA N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

  • Jeon, Yeong Jeong (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Yong Soo (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Kyung Jong (Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Se Hoon (Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Pyo, Hongryull (Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Joon Young (Department of Nuclear Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2017.05.04
  • Accepted : 2017.10.31
  • Published : 2018.02.05

Abstract

Background: We evaluated the feasibility and outcomes of pulmonary resection and mediastinal node dissection (MND) by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) following neoadjuvant therapy for stage IIIA N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: From November 2009 to December 2013, a total of 35 consecutive patients with pathologically or radiologically confirmed stage IIIA N2 lung cancer underwent pulmonary resection and MND, performed by a single surgeon, following neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Preoperative patient characteristics, surgical outcomes, postoperative drainage, postoperative complications, and mortality were retrospectively analyzed. Results: VATS was completed in 17 patients. Thoracotomy was performed in 18 patients, with 13 planned thoracotomies and 5 conversions from the VATS approach. The median age was $62.7{\pm}7.9years$ in the VATS group and $60{\pm}8.7years$ in the thoracotomy group. The patients in the VATS group tended to have a lower diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (p=0.077). There were no differences between the 2 groups in the method of diagnosing the N stage, tumor response and size after induction, tumor location, or histologic type. Complete resection was achieved in all patients. More total and mediastinal nodes were dissected in the VATS group than in the thoracotomy group (p<0.05). The median chest tube duration was 5.3 days (range, 1 to 33 days) for the VATS group and 7.2 days (range, 2 to 28 days) for the thoracotomy group. The median follow-up duration was 36.3 months. The 5-year survival rates were 76% in the VATS group and 57.8% in the thoracotomy group (p=0.39). The 5-year disease-free survival rates were 40.3% and 38.9% in the VATS and thoracotomy groups, respectively (p=0.8). Conclusion: The VATS approach following neoadjuvant treatment was safe and feasible in selected patients for the treatment of stage IIIA N2 NSCLC, with no compromise of oncologic efficacy.

Keywords

References

  1. Roviaro G, Rebuffat C, Varoli F, Vergani C, Mariani C, Maciocco M. Videoendoscopic pulmonary lobectomy for cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1992;2:244-7.
  2. Whitson BA, Andrade RS, Boettcher A, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is more favorable than thoracotomy for resection of clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83:1965-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.01.049
  3. Villamizar NR, Darrabie MD, Burfeind WR, et al. Thoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with lower morbidity compared with thoracotomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;138:419-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.04.026
  4. Marty-Ane CH, Canaud L, Solovei L, Alric P, Berthet JP. Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: an unavoidable trend?: a retrospective single-institution series of 410 cases. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2013;17:36-43. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivt146
  5. McKenna RJ Jr, Houck WV. New approaches to the minimally invasive treatment of lung cancer. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2005;11:282-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mcp.0000166589.08880.44
  6. Shaw JP, Dembitzer FR, Wisnivesky JP, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: state of the art and future directions. Ann Thorac Surg 2008;85:S705-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.11.048
  7. Huang J, Xu X, Chen H, et al. Feasibility of complete video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery following neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Dis 2013;5 Suppl 3:S267-73.
  8. Park JS, Kim K, Choi MS, Chang SW, Han WS. Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy for pathologic stage I non-small cell lung cancer: a comparative study with thoracotomy lobectomy. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011;44:32-8. https://doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2011.44.1.32
  9. Boffa DJ, Kosinski AS, Paul S, Mitchell JD, Onaitis M. Lymph node evaluation by open or video-assisted approaches in 11,500 anatomic lung cancer resections. Ann Thorac Surg 2012;94:347-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.04.059
  10. Denlinger CE, Fernandez F, Meyers BF, et al. Lymph node evaluation in video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy versus lobectomy by thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2010;89: 1730-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.02.094
  11. Watanabe A, Koyanagi T, Ohsawa H, et al. Systematic node dissection by VATS is not inferior to that through an open thoracotomy: a comparative clinicopathologic retrospective study. Surgery 2005;138:510-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2005.04.005
  12. D'Amico TA, Niland J, Mamet R, Zornosa C, Dexter EU, Onaitis MW. Efficacy of mediastinal lymph node dissection during lobectomy for lung cancer by thoracoscopy and thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2011;92:226-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.03.134

Cited by

  1. Clinical Outcomes And Cost-Effectiveness Of Different Staplers For Lung Lobectomy With Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery vol.11, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.2147/cmar.s230926
  2. Factors Influencing Complications after Therapeutic Lung Resection in Lung Cancer Patients vol.27, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.7739/jkafn.2020.27.2.106
  3. 폐절제술을 받은 폐암환자의 영양섭취 상태와 수술 후 폐합병증 vol.23, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.7586/jkbns.2021.23.1.11
  4. Minimally invasive lung resection after induction therapy: Is there evidence? vol.8, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjon.2021.07.038