The Korean Journal of Emergency Medical Services (한국응급구조학회지)

The Korea Society of Emergency Medical Services (한국응급구조학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of chest compression and ventilation volume using LUCAS and manual in virtual reality-based ambulance simulation -A manikin study-

가상실현 기반 구급차에서 루카스와 수기에 의한 가슴압박과 인공호흡 비교 -마네킨 연구-

  • Lee, Jae-Gook (Department of Emergency Medical Services, Sunmoon University) ;
  • Kim, Jin-Su (National 119 Rescue Headquarters) ;
  • Roh, Sang-Gyun (Department of Emergency Medical Services, Sunmoon University)
  • 이재국 (선문대학교 응급구조학과) ;
  • 김진수 (중앙 119 구조본부 교육훈련과) ;
  • 노상균 (선문대학교 응급구조학과)
  • Received : 2018.11.22
  • Accepted : 2018.12.16
  • Published : 2018.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quality of chest compressions and ventilation when using an mechanical device(LUCAS) and 2-men manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation(CPR) performed on a minikin, as well as to propose a more effective CPR method during transit. Methods: Data were collected by LUCAS and manual virtual reality based ambulance simulation. Analysis was performed using SPSS software 12.0. The average and standard deviation of chest compression depth and ventilation were analyzed using descriptive statistics and t-test. Results: In the virtual reality based LUCAS and manual CPR results, LUCAS showed better chest compression and lower incomplete chest release than manual CPR. During CPR with a chest compression-ventilation ratio of 30:2 in virtual reality ventilation with bag-valve mask was able to deliver an adequate volume of breathing. Conclusion: It is suggested that rescuers on ambulance may consider using LUCAS as an alternative to high-quality chest compression during transit.

Keywords

References

  1. Stiell IG, Brown SP, Nichol G, Cheskes S, Vaillancourt C, Callaway CW et al. What is the optimal chest compression depth during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation of adult patients?. Circulation 2014;130:1962-70. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.008671
  2. Christenson JD, Andrusiek S, Everson-Stewart P, Kudenchuk D, Hostler J, Powell J et al. Chest compression fraction determines survival in patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation. Circulation 2009;120(13):1241-7. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.852202
  3. Thomas SH, Stone CK, Bryan-Berge D. The ability to perform closed chest compressions in helicopters. Am J Emerg Med 1994;12(3):296-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-6757(94)90142-2
  4. Kramer-Johansen J, Myklebust H, Wik L, Fellows B, Svensson L, SoreboH et al. Quality of out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with real time automated feedback: a prospective interventional study. Resuscitation 2006;71(3):283-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.05.011
  5. www.nfa.go.kr/nfa
  6. Shin SY, Kim JH, Kim GY, Kang SW, Bang SH, Yun JG et al. A study on the cardiopulmonary resuscitation method in ambulance. Korean Institute of Fire Sci Eng 2014;28(4):104-11. https://doi.org/10.7731/KIFSE.2014.28.4.104
  7. Jang MS, Tak YJ. The variation of elapsed time on fatigue and quality of single rescuer cardiopulmonary resuscitation. J Emerg Med Ser 2013;17(1):9-19.
  8. Wik L, Olsen JA, Persse D, Sterz F, Lozano M, Brouwer MA et al. Manual vs. integrated automatic load-distributing band CPR with equal survival after out of hospital cardiac arrest. The randomized CIRC trial. Resuscitation 2014;85(6):741-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation. 2014.03.005
  9. Rubertsson S, Lindgren E, Smekal D, Ostlund O, Silfverstolpe J, Lichtveld RA et al. Mechanical chest compressions and simultaneous defibrillation vs conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the LINC randomized trial. JAMA 2014;311(1):53-61. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.282538
  10. Perkins GD, Lall R, Quinn T, Deakin CD, Cooke MW, Horton J et al. PARAMEDIC trial collaborators. Mechanical versus manual chest compression for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC): a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2015;385(9972):947-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61886-9
  11. Mitten MJ, Zipes DP, Maron BJ, Bryant WJ. Eligibility and disqualification recommendations for competitive athletes with cardiovascular abnormalities: task force 15: legal aspects of medical eligibility and disqualification recommendations: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology. Circulation 2015;132(22):e346-9. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000251
  12. Chi AR, Cho YS, Lee HJ, Lee JH, Cho GC, Kim WY et al. The influence of vertical location of cardiac arrest and application of mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation device on out of hospital cardiac arrest in a community: a retrospective observational study. J Korean Soc Emerg Med 2016;27(6):530-9.
  13. 2015 AHA Guidelines for CPR and ECC. AHA. 2015.
  14. Kim GY. The effect of EMT belt on chest compressions in moving ambulance. Unpublished master's thesis, Kangwon National University 2014, Samcheok, Korea.
  15. Hong SG. Son IA. A study on the factors influencing the accuracy of chest compression during cardiopulmonary resuscitation trying in a moving ambulance. J Korean Soc Emerg Med 2009;20(4):343-54.
  16. Braunfels S, Meinhard K, Zieher B, Koetter KP, Malech WH, Petroianu GA. A randomized, controlled trial of the efficacy of closed chest compressions in ambulances. Prehospital Emergency Care 1997;1(3):128-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/10903129708958804
  17. Ochoa FJ, Ramalle-Gomara E, Lisa V, Saralequi I. The effect of rescuer fatigue on the quality of chest compressions. Resuscitation 1998;37(3):149-52. PMID:9715774 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9572(98)00057-4
  18. Shin SY, Roh SG. Comparison of ventilatory volume and airway pressures using oxylator EM-100. Fire Sci Eng 2015;29(5):104-9. https://doi.org/10.7731/KIFSE.2015.29.5.104
  19. Jo SM, Jung HK, Differentiation of tidal volume & mean airway pressure with different bag-valve-mask compression depth and compression rate. Korean J Emerg Med Ser 2012;16(2):67-74. https://doi.org/10.14408/KJEMS.2012.16.2.067
  20. Cho YC, Cho SW, Chung SP, Yu K, Kwon OY, Kim SW. How can a single rescuer adequately deliver tidal volume with a manual resuscitator? An improved device for device for delivering regular tidal volume. J Korean Soc Emerg Med 2011;28(1):40-3.
  21. Aufderheide TP, Sigurdsson G, Pirrallo RG, Yannopoulos D, McKnite S, von Briesen C et al. Hyperventilation induced hypotension during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Circulation 2004;109(16):1960-5. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000126594.79136.61
  22. Han GK, Ryu SY, Kim HJ, Lee SL, Cho SJ, Oh SC. Comparison of CPR outcomes between AutopulseTM and manual compression in adult out of hospital cardiac arrest. J Korean Soc Emerg Med 2009;28(6):256-63.
  23. Cho YS, Choi SC, Lee CA, Jung YS, Kim GW. Comparison of manual versus mechanical chest compression during simulation out of hospital cardiac arrest. J Korean Soc Emerg Med 2009;23(4):486-92.
  24. Kim TH, Hong KJ, Shin SD, Kim CH, Song SW, Song KJ et al. Quality between mechanical compression on reducible stretcher versus manual compression on standard stretcher in small elevator. Am J Emerg Med 2016;34(8):1604-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2016.05.072