DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Accuracy and reproducibility of 3D digital tooth preparations made by gypsum materials of various colors

  • Tan, Fa-Bing (College of Stomatology, Chongqing Medical University) ;
  • Wang, Chao (College of Stomatology, Chongqing Medical University) ;
  • Dai, Hong-Wei (College of Stomatology, Chongqing Medical University) ;
  • Fan, Yu-Bo (Laboratory for Biomechanics and Mechanobiology of Ministry of Education, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University) ;
  • Song, Jin-Lin (College of Stomatology, Chongqing Medical University)
  • 투고 : 2017.03.14
  • 심사 : 2017.08.29
  • 발행 : 2018.02.28

초록

PURPOSE. The study aimed to identify the accuracy and reproducibility of preparations made by gypsum materials of various colors using quantitative and semi-quantitative three-dimensional (3D) approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A titanium maxillary first molar preparation was created as reference dataset (REF). Silicone impressions were duplicated from REF and randomized into 6 groups (n=8). Gypsum preparations were formed and grouped according to the color of gypsum materials, and light-scanned to obtain prepared datasets (PRE). Then, in terms of accuracy, PRE were superimposed on REF using the best-fit-algorithm and PRE underwent intragroup pairwise best-fit alignment for assessing reproducibility. Root mean square deviation (RMSD) and degrees of similarity (DS) were computed and analyzed with SPSS 20.0 statistical software (${\alpha}=.05$). RESULTS. In terms of accuracy, PREs in 3D directions were increased in the 6 color groups (from 19.38 to $20.88{\mu}m$), of which the marginal and internal variations ranged $51.36-58.26{\mu}m$ and $18.33-20.04{\mu}m$, respectively. On the other hand, RMSD value and DS-scores did not show significant differences among groups. Regarding reproducibility, both RMSD and DS-scores showed statistically significant differences among groups, while RMSD values of the 6 color groups were less than $5{\mu}m$, of which blue color group was the smallest ($3.27{\pm}0.24{\mu}m$) and white color group was the largest ($4.24{\pm}0.36{\mu}m$). These results were consistent with the DS data. CONCLUSION. The 3D volume of the PREs was predisposed towards an increase during digitalization, which was unaffected by gypsum color. Furthermore, the reproducibility of digitalizing scanning differed negligibly among different gypsum colors, especially in comparison to clinically observed discrepancies.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kim SY, Lee SH, Cho SK, Jeong CM, Jeon YC, Yun MJ, Huh JB. Comparison of the accuracy of digitally fabricated polyurethane model and conventional gypsum model. J Adv Prosthodont 2014;6:1-7. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.1.1
  2. Keshvad A, Hooshmand T, Asefzadeh F, Khalilinejad F, Alihemmati M, Van Noort R. Marginal gap, internal fit, and fracture load of leucite-reinforced ceramic inlays fabricated by CEREC inLab and hot-pressed techniques. J Prosthodont 2011;20:535-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00745.x
  3. Eisenburger M, Shellis RP, Addy M. Comparative study of wear of enamel induced by alternating and simultaneous combinations of abrasion and erosion in vitro. Caries Res 2003;37:450-5. https://doi.org/10.1159/000073399
  4. Bartlett DW, Blunt L, Smith BG. Measurement of tooth wear in patients with palatal erosion. Br Dent J 1997;182:179-84. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4809338
  5. Azzopardi A, Bartlett DW, Watson TF, Sherriff M. The measurement and prevention of erosion and abrasion. J Dent 2001;29:395-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(01)00031-8
  6. Mehl A, Gloger W, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. A new optical 3-D device for the detection of wear. J Dent Res 1997;76: 1799-807. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345970760111201
  7. Pintado MR, Anderson GC, DeLong R, Douglas WH. Variation in tooth wear in young adults over a two-year period. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:313-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70189-6
  8. Schlueter N, Ganss C, De Sanctis S, Klimek J. Evaluation of a profilometrical method for monitoring erosive tooth wear. Eur J Oral Sci 2005;113:505-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2005.00253.x
  9. McBride J, Christian M. The 3D measurement and analysis of high precision surfaces using con-focal optical methods. IEICE transactions on electronics 2004;87:1261-7.
  10. DeLong R, Pintado MR, Ko CC, Hodges JS, Douglas WH. Factors influencing optical 3D scanning of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials. J Prosthodont 2001;10:78-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2001.00078.x
  11. Heintze SD, Forjanic M, Rousson V. Surface roughness and gloss of dental materials as a function of force and polishing time in vitro. Dent Mater 2006;22:146-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.013
  12. Wieland M, Textor M, Spencer ND, Brunette DM. Wavelength-dependent roughness: a quantitative approach to characterizing the topography of rough titanium surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:163-81.
  13. Rodriguez JM, Curtis RV, Bartlett DW. Surface roughness of impression materials and dental stones scanned by non-contacting laser profilometry. Dent Mater 2009;25:500-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.10.003
  14. Kim JH, Kim KB, Kim WC, Rhee HS, Lee IH, Kim JH. Influence of various gypsum materials on precision of fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated zirconia copings. Dent Mater J 2015; 34:19-24. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2014-141
  15. Schaefer O, Watts DC, Sigusch BW, Kuepper H, Guentsch A. Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate partial crowns in vitro: a three-dimensional analysis of accuracy and reproducibility. Dent Mater 2012;28:320-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.12.008
  16. Schaefer O, Kuepper H, Sigusch BW, Thompson GA, Hefti AF, Guentsch A. Three-dimensional fit of lithium disilicate partial crowns in vitro. J Dent 2013;41:271-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.11.014
  17. Schaefer O, Kuepper H, Thompson GA, Cachovan G, Hefti AF, Guentsch A. Effect of CNC-milling on the marginal and internal fit of dental ceramics: a pilot study. Dent Mater 2013; 29:851-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.04.018
  18. Wadhwani CP, Johnson GH, Lepe X, Raigrodski AJ. Accuracy of newly formulated fast-setting elastomeric impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:530-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.03.007
  19. Millar BJ, Dunne SM, Robinson PB. The effect of a surface wetting agent on void formation in impressions. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:54-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70207-5
  20. Cho SH, Schaefer O, Thompson GA, Guentsch A. Comparison of accuracy and reproducibility of casts made by digital and conventional methods. J Prosthet Dent 2015;113: 310-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.09.027
  21. Guth JF, Keul C, Stimmelmayr M, Beuer F, Edelhoff D. Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:1201-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0795-0
  22. Beuer F, Aggstaller H, Edelhoff D, Gernet W, Sorensen J. Marginal and internal fits of fixed dental prostheses zirconia retainers. Dent Mater 2009;25:94-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.04.018
  23. Abdel-Azim T, Rogers K, Elathamna E, Zandinejad A, Metz M, Morton D. Comparison of the marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM technology by using conventional impressions and two intraoral digital scanners. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:554-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.001
  24. Tsirogiannis P, Reissmann DR, Heydecke G. Evaluation of the marginal fit of single-unit, complete-coverage ceramic restorations fabricated after digital and conventional impressions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:328-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.01.028
  25. Rajan BN, Jayaraman S, Kandhasamy B, Rajakumaran I. Evaluation of marginal fit and internal adaptation of zirconia copings fabricated by two CAD - CAM systems: An in vitro study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2015;15:173-8. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4052.159970
  26. Shembesh M, Ali A, Finkelman M, Weber HP, Zandparsa R. An in vitro comparison of the marginal adaptation accuracy of CAD/CAM restorations using different impression systems. J Prosthodont 2017;26:581-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12446
  27. Yildiz C, Vanlioglu BA, Evren B, Uludamar A, Ozkan YK. Marginal-internal adaptation and fracture resistance of CAD/CAM crown restorations. Dent Mater J 2013;32:42-7. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2012-148
  28. Vanlioglu BA, Evren B, Yildiz C, Uludamar A, Ozkan YK. Internal and marginal adaptation of pressable and computeraided design/computer-assisted manufacture onlay restorations. Int J Prosthodont 2012;25:262-4.
  29. Alghazzawi TF, Liu PR, Essig ME. The effect of different fabrication steps on the marginal adaptation of two types of glass-infiltrated ceramic crown copings fabricated by CAD/CAM technology. J Prosthodont 2012;21:167-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00803.x
  30. Soares CJ, Martins LR, Fonseca RB, Correr-Sobrinho L, Fernandes Neto AJ. Influence of cavity preparation design on fracture resistance of posterior Leucite-reinforced ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:421-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.03.022
  31. Bender IB, Freedland JB. Clinical considerations in the diagnosis and treatment of intra-alveolar root fractures. J Am Dent Assoc 1983;107:595-600. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1983.0297
  32. Schaefer O, Schmidt M, Goebel R, Kuepper H. Qualitative and quantitative three-dimensional accuracy of a single tooth captured by elastomeric impression materials: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2012;108:165-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60141-3
  33. Phillips S. Report of a special test. NIST Test 2010;681/280055-10, October 8, 2010. Available at http://www.geomagic.com/download_file/view/1133/104/, accessed November 11, 2011.
  34. Ender A, Mehl A. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision. J Prosthet Dent 2013;109:121-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60028-1
  35. Ender A, Mehl A. Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions-an in-vitro study. Int J Comput Dent 2011;14:11-21.

피인용 문헌

  1. Comparison of Intaglio Surface Trueness of Interim Dental Crowns Fabricated with SLA 3D Printing, DLP 3D Printing, and Milling Technologies vol.9, pp.8, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9080983